VS

Audi Q7 vs Suzuki Swace comparison

Compare performance (507 HP vs 140 HP), boot space and price (70,600 £ vs 31,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q7 or Suzuki Swace?

Audi Q7 vs Suzuki Swace: Key differences

Audi Q7

4.5 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more power
  • slightly more efficient
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
  • noticeably more trunk space
details

Suzuki Swace

4.5 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • clearly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Q7

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Suzuki Swace is substantially cheaper – starting at 31,900 £ , while the Audi Q7 costs 70,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 38,751 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Audi Q7 uses 3.8 L/100km and is slightly more efficient than the Suzuki Swace with 4.5 L/100km. The difference is about 0.7 L/100km.

Swace

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q7 offers significantly more power – delivering 507 HP compared to 140 HP. That’s roughly 367 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q7 is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 4.1 s, while the Suzuki Swace takes 9.4 s. That’s about 5.3 s quicker.

Q7

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Audi Q7 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Suzuki Swace is clearly lighter – 1,475 kg compared to 2,055 kg. The difference is around 580 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Audi Q7 offers noticeably more boot space – 887 L compared to 596 L. That’s a difference of about 291 L.

When it comes to payload, the Audi Q7 carries considerably more – 885 kg compared to 360 kg. That’s a difference of about 525 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi Q7 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £70,600
Q7

Audi Q7

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 231 - 507 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 3.8 - 11.9 L/100km
  • Electric Range 81 - 82 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Suzuki Swace
Toyota Corolla
VS
Think of this as a family-friendly duel: the Suzuki Swace, a sensible, value-focused take on Toyota’s proven hybrid estate, versus the Toyota Corolla, the familiar all-rounder that’s been refining the formula for years. Which one gives you smarter value, a more engaging drive and lower running …
Audi A6 Avant
Audi Q7
VS
Audi A6 Avant and Audi Q7 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Audi A6 Avant or the Audi Q7 …
Audi Q7
Suzuki Swace

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Audi Q7

The Audi Q7 cuts an imposing figure on the road, balancing restrained luxury with a spacious, tech-rich cabin that makes long journeys feel effortless. It rides with confident composure and polished manners, so if you want a premium family SUV that feels grown-up and worth the badge, the Q7 is a persuasive choice — even the in-laws will be impressed.

details
A199690_overfull
A199691_overfull
A199697_overfull
A199699_overfull
A198125_overfull
A199643_overfull

Reviews Audi Q7

4.5 (2 Reviews)
rate
A.B.
24 Mar 2026, 11:45:19

Constant faults with the touch door opening, the trunk, sign-reading and the front obstacle sensors. The service repaired it under warranty five times — they replaced wiring harnesses, a sensor, uploaded software — and then gave up. They told me they don’t know what else to do. That’s the customer care at a German premium brand. A car worth over 400,000 and they tell the customer they don’t know what to do. I paid the final installment and I’m giving the car back to them. I’m taking a Chinese BYD Seal U DM-i plug-in hybrid with better equipment for 165k after a discount from 225k. With that attitude to customers and those high prices, the Germans will have fewer and fewer people interested in their cars — but they’ve only got themselves to blame!!!

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Suzuki Swace

The Suzuki Swace is a pragmatic estate that swaps showy design for roomy practicality and a quiet, comfortable ride that suits everyday family life. It won't thrill the enthusiast, but its sensible charm, dependable build and clever packaging make it a smart pick for buyers who want fuss-free usability rather than headline-grabbing performance.

details
SUZUKI KARTE-1849_sRGB
SUZUKI KARTE-1774_sRGB
SUZUKI KARTE-1627_sRGB
SUZUKI KARTE-2074_sRGB
Suzuki_Swace_2

Reviews Suzuki Swace

4.5 (3 Reviews)
rate
Sjors
16 Apr 2026, 11:06:18

I have the Swace — it drives much more frugally than you state: 1:23. A downside as you get older is that getting in, and especially getting out, becomes harder because of the low seating position. The advantage of the low seat is better fuel economy. 16‑inch wheels are also likely to be more economical than larger ones. Rear legroom is poor. It would be nice if the rear bench were on rails like the Renault Twingo. Shrinking the boot would give more rear legroom. The 2014 Toyota Prius was the last to offer lots of rear legroom — after that it’s been rubbish.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Audi Q7
Land Rover Discovery
VS
Audi Q7 and Land Rover Discovery go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Audi Q7 or the Land …
Suzuki Swace
Toyota Corolla Touring Sports
VS
The Suzuki Swace and the Toyota Corolla Touring Sports are closely related compact estate cars that combine hybrid efficiency with practical, family-friendly space. This comparison focuses on how the Swace and the Corolla Touring Sports differ in styling, equipment, driving feel and running costs …
Ford Focus
Suzuki Swace
VS
In a showdown between the Ford Focus and the Suzuki Swace, the Focus stands out with its dynamic handling and robust engine options that cater to driving enthusiasts seeking a spirited ride. Meanwhile, the Suzuki Swace offers a practical hybrid drivetrain with outstanding fuel efficiency, making it …
Audi A7
Audi Q7
VS
Audi A7 and Audi Q7 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Audi A7 or the Audi Q7 is the …
Audi Q7
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
Audi Q7 and Skoda Kodiaq go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Audi Q7 or the Skoda Kodiaq …
Audi Q7
VW Tayron
VS
In the competitive landscape of luxury SUVs, the Audi Q7 and the VW Tayron present distinct offerings that cater to varying preferences. The Q7 impresses with its opulent interior, advanced technology, and superior performance, making it a top choice for those seeking a premium experience. …
Audi Q7
Hyundai Santa Fe
VS
Audi Q7 and Hyundai Santa Fe go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Audi Q7 or the Hyundai …
Audi Q5
Audi Q7
VS
In the competitive luxury SUV market, the Audi Q5 and Q7 each offer distinct advantages tailored to different lifestyles. The Q5 impresses with its nimble handling and compact design, making it ideal for city driving, while the Q7 shines with its spacious interior and three-row seating, perfect for …
Audi Q7
Suzuki Swace

Costs and Consumption
Price
70,600 - 100,600 £
Price
31,900 £
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 11.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
81 - 82 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
86 - 271 g/km
co2
102 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
43 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Estate
Seats
5 - 7
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
2,055 - 2,460 kg
Curb weight
1,475 kg
Trunk capacity
563 - 887 L
Trunk capacity
596 L
Length
-
Length
4,655 mm
Width
1,970 mm
Width
1,790 mm
Height
-
Height
1,460 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,606 L
Payload
640 - 885 kg
Payload
360 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
CVT
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
231 - 507 HP
Power HP
140 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.1 - 7.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
500 - 770 Nm
Torque
-
Number of Cylinders
6 - 8
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
170 - 373 kW
Power kW
103 kW
Engine capacity
2,967 - 3,996 cm3
Engine capacity
1,798 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
Brand
Audi
Brand
Suzuki
Is the Audi Q7 offered with different drivetrains?

The Audi Q7 is available as All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.