VS

Audi Q7 vs Skoda Kodiaq comparison

Compare performance (507 HP vs 265 HP), boot space and price (70,600 £ vs 37,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q7 or Skoda Kodiaq?

Audi Q7 vs Skoda Kodiaq: Key differences

Audi Q7

4 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Skoda Kodiaq

5 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • substantially more efficient
  • visibly more electric range
  • clearly lighter
  • very slightly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Q7

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Skoda Kodiaq is considerably cheaper – starting at 37,900 £ , while the Audi Q7 costs 70,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 32,751 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Kodiaq uses 1.5 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Audi Q7 with 3.8 L/100km. The difference is about 2.3 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Skoda Kodiaq offers visibly more range – reaching up to 122 km, about 40 km more than the Audi Q7.

Kodiaq

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q7 offers considerably more power – delivering 507 HP compared to 265 HP. That’s roughly 242 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q7 is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 4.1 s, while the Skoda Kodiaq takes 6.3 s. That’s about 2.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q7 delivers significantly more torque with 770 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 370 Nm more.

Q7

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Audi Q7 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Kodiaq is clearly lighter – 1,684 kg compared to 2,055 kg. The difference is around 371 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers very slightly more boot space – 910 L compared to 887 L. That’s a difference of about 23 L.

When it comes to payload, the Audi Q7 carries markedly more – 885 kg compared to 563 kg. That’s a difference of about 322 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Kodiaq is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £37,900
Kodiaq

Skoda Kodiaq

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 150 - 265 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 119 - 122 km
Audi Q7
Skoda Kodiaq

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Audi Q7

The Audi Q7 cuts an imposing figure on the road, balancing restrained luxury with a spacious, tech-rich cabin that makes long journeys feel effortless. It rides with confident composure and polished manners, so if you want a premium family SUV that feels grown-up and worth the badge, the Q7 is a persuasive choice — even the in-laws will be impressed.

details

Skoda Kodiaq

The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.

details
Audi Q7
Skoda Kodiaq

Costs and Consumption

Price
70,600 - 100,600 £
Price
37,900 - 50,600 £
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 11.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
81 - 82 km
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
86 - 271 g/km
co2
35 - 186 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
58 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5 - 7
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
2,055 - 2,460 kg
Curb weight
1,684 - 1,970 kg
Trunk capacity
563 - 887 L
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
Length
-
Length
4,758 mm
Width
1,970 mm
Width
1,864 mm
Height
-
Height
1,679 - 1,683 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
2,105 L
Payload
640 - 885 kg
Payload
460 - 563 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
231 - 507 HP
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.1 - 7.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
226 km/h
Torque
500 - 770 Nm
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Number of Cylinders
6 - 8
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
170 - 373 kW
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
Engine capacity
2,967 - 3,996 cm3
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
Brand
Audi
Brand
Skoda
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.