VS

Skoda Kodiaq vs MG MGS9 comparison

Compare performance (265 HP vs 299 HP), boot space and price (37,900 £ vs 38,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Kodiaq or MG MGS9?

Skoda Kodiaq vs MG MGS9: Key differences

Skoda Kodiaq

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • barely cheaper
  • considerably more efficient
  • somewhat more electric range
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • noticeably lighter
  • significantly more trunk space
details

MG MGS9

  • a bit more power
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kodiaq

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Skoda Kodiaq is barely cheaper – starting at 37,900 £ , while the MG MGS9 costs 38,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 685 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Kodiaq uses 1.5 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the MG MGS9 with 2.4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.9 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Skoda Kodiaq offers somewhat more range – reaching up to 122 km, about 22 km more than the MG MGS9.

Kodiaq

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the MG MGS9 offers a bit more power – delivering 299 HP compared to 265 HP. That’s roughly 34 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 6.3 s, while the MG MGS9 takes 9.6 s. That’s about 3.3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Kodiaq delivers marginally more torque with 400 Nm compared to 390 Nm. That’s about 10 Nm more.

Kodiaq

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: MG MGS9 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Kodiaq is noticeably lighter – 1,684 kg compared to 2,160 kg. The difference is around 476 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers significantly more boot space – 910 L compared to 332 L. That’s a difference of about 578 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Kodiaq carries marginally more – 563 kg compared to 557 kg. That’s a difference of about 6 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Kodiaq is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £37,900
Kodiaq

Skoda Kodiaq

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 150 - 265 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 119 - 122 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Kodiaq
VW Tayron
VS
The Skoda Kodiaq is the no-nonsense family hauler: cavernous boot, clever storage, and a sensible price that makes sense when you’ve got kids and a budget. The VW Tayron trades some of that practicality for sharper looks, a firmer ride and smarter tech — pick it if you want a touch more polish and …
Skoda Kodiaq
Toyota RAV4
VS
If you need seven seats, cavernous boot space and a grown-up ride, the Škoda Kodiaq is the sensible family hero that gets the job done without drama; it’s spacious, refined and embarrasses smaller SUVs at the supermarket run. The Toyota RAV4, meanwhile, is the rugged, hybrid-savvy all-rounder — …
Skoda Kodiaq
MG MGS9

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Skoda Kodiaq

The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.

details
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112967
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112975
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112969
KODIAQ_45646
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112984

Reviews Skoda Kodiaq

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate
Geert
5 May 2026, 08:49:23

The Skoda Kodiac looks sleeker and is bigger. The Ford Explorer is a bit smaller and there was such a fuss made about it, but it’s disappointing in looks and even worse on the inside.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
zlatko P.
10 Feb 2026, 10:37:54

more for money, pracical

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

MG MGS9

The MG MGS9 presents itself as a stylish, value-focused flagship SUV with a roomy, well-equipped cabin and contemporary infotainment. It balances a comfortable ride with engaging handling, making it a compelling choice for buyers seeking a feature-rich alternative to established rivals.

details

Reviews MG MGS9

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Skoda Enyaq is the slick, silent EV that turns everyday driving into a techy, whisper-quiet commute, while the Skoda Kodiaq remains the go-anywhere, seven-seat family SUV that swallows luggage and trailers without complaint. Choose the Enyaq for lower running costs, a modern cabin and …
Hyundai Tucson
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Hyundai Tucson and Skoda Kodiaq pit a stylish, tech-packed compact crossover against a larger, family-focused SUV with up to seven seats. I’ll compare space, comfort, driving character and running costs so you can decide which suits your needs.
Opel Grandland
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
Choosing between the Opel Grandland and the Skoda Kodiaq means weighing a stylish, efficient compact crossover against a larger, more practical family SUV. I’ll guide you through how they compare on space, engines, features and running costs so you can pick the one that fits your everyday needs.
Skoda Superb Combi
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Skoda Superb Combi is a roomy, practical estate that focuses on comfort and massive luggage space, while the Skoda Kodiaq is a taller, more versatile SUV that suits families needing optional seven-seat flexibility and a higher driving position. Choosing between them comes down to whether you …
Skoda Kodiaq
Mitsubishi Outlander
VS
The Skoda Kodiaq and the Mitsubishi Outlander both aim at buyers needing a practical, family-friendly SUV, but they take different approaches—Kodiaq prioritizes space and refinement, while Outlander leans on value and versatility. This comparison highlights the strengths and trade-offs so you can …
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC90
VS
If you want pragmatic space and clever value, the Skoda Kodiaq is the family hauler that stretches your budget without feeling cheap; the Volvo XC90, by contrast, pampers with Scandinavian refinement, top-tier safety tech and a calmer motorway demeanour. Choose the Kodiaq for practical boots, …
Mercedes GLB
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Mercedes GLB dresses up compact practicality in a premium suit, with crisp tech and city-friendly manners, while the Skoda Kodiaq goes full-on family hauler, offering cavernous space and sensible value. Choose the GLB for style and badge appeal; pick the Kodiaq if you need seats, luggage and a …
Skoda Kodiaq
VW Touran
VS
If you need room for a football team and their luggage, the Skoda Kodiaq is the grown‑up SUV — cavernous interior, composed long‑distance ride and clever storage touches that make family life embarrassingly easy. The VW Touran, by contrast, is the sharper, more city‑friendly people‑carrier with …
Skoda Kodiaq
MG MGS9

Costs and Consumption
Price
37,900 - 50,600 £
Price
38,600 - 41,800 £
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
2.4 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
Electric Range
100 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
35 - 186 g/km
co2
54 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
7
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,684 - 1,970 kg
Curb weight
2,160 kg
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
Trunk capacity
332 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,864 mm
Width
1,967 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
460 - 563 kg
Payload
557 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
Power HP
299 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Torque
390 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
Power kW
220 kW
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
Engine capacity
1,496 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
Brand
Skoda
Brand
MG
What drivetrain options does the Skoda Kodiaq have?

The Skoda Kodiaq is available as All-Wheel Drive or Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.