Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Audi Q8 e-tron vs Ford Mustang Mach-E comparison
Compare performance (503 HP vs 487 HP), boot space and price (65,100 £ vs 48,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q8 e-tron or Ford Mustang Mach-E?
Audi Q8 e-tron vs Ford Mustang Mach-E: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Q8 e-tron
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Ford Mustang Mach-E is markedly cheaper – starting at 48,400 £ , while the Audi Q8 e-tron costs 65,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 16,629 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is moderately more efficient: consuming 17.7 kWh/100km compared to 19.7 kWh/100km for the Audi Q8 e-tron. That’s a difference of about 2 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers barely more range – reaching up to 600 km, about 5 km more than the Audi Q8 e-tron.
Mustang Mach-E
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q8 e-tron offers marginally more power – delivering 503 HP compared to 487 HP. That’s roughly 16 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is moderately quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Audi Q8 e-tron takes 4.5 s. That’s about 0.7 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q8 e-tron delivers marginally more torque with 973 Nm compared to 950 Nm. That’s about 23 Nm more.
Q8 e-tron
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Mustang Mach-E is somewhat lighter – 2,161 kg compared to 2,585 kg. The difference is around 424 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Audi Q8 e-tron offers only slightly more boot space – 569 L compared to 519 L. That’s a difference of about 50 L.
When it comes to payload, the Audi Q8 e-tron carries noticeably more – 595 kg compared to 450 kg. That’s a difference of about 145 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E comes out clearly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £48,400
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Audi Q8 e-tron
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Audi Q8 e-tron
The Audi Q8 e-tron wraps Audi’s usual premium polish into a quiet, composed electric SUV that feels refined and surprisingly effortless to drive. With a spacious, tech-forward cabin and understated road presence, it’s a practical yet stylish choice for buyers who want electric motoring without losing the dignity of a proper luxury SUV.
details
Ford Mustang Mach-E
The Mustang Mach-E proves an electric SUV can be both playful and practical, with the Mustang name bringing muscle-car charisma to a family-friendly package. It delivers eager performance, a comfortable cabin, and a slick infotainment setup that keeps daily driving fun — and yes, you’ll still get admiring glances at the lights.
details
Audi Q8 e-tron
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
65,100 - 102,800 £
|
Price
48,400 - 66,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.7 - 26.3 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
456 - 595 km
|
Electric Range
470 - 600 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
89 - 106 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,585 - 2,725 kg
|
Curb weight
2,161 - 2,351 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
528 - 569 L
|
Trunk capacity
519 L
|
|
Length
4,915 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,937 - 1,994 mm
|
Width
1,881 mm
|
|
Height
1,617 - 1,683 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,567 - 1,637 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
515 - 595 kg
|
Payload
368 - 450 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
340 - 503 HP
|
Power HP
268 - 487 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.5 - 6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 6.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
200 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
664 - 973 Nm
|
Torque
525 - 950 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
250 - 370 kW
|
Power kW
197 - 358 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,023 - 2,024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Ford
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.