Compare performance (503 HP vs 680 HP), boot space and price (65,100 £ vs 61,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q8 e-tron or Volvo ES90?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Volvo ES90 is only slightly cheaper – starting at 61,700 £ , while the Audi Q8 e-tron costs 65,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,352 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Volvo ES90 is noticeably more efficient: consuming 15.9 kWh/100km compared to 19.7 kWh/100km for the Audi Q8 e-tron. That’s a difference of about 3.8 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Volvo ES90 offers slightly more range – reaching up to 700 km, about 105 km more than the Audi Q8 e-tron.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo ES90 offers visibly more power – delivering 680 HP compared to 503 HP. That’s roughly 177 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo ES90 is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 4 s, while the Audi Q8 e-tron takes 4.5 s. That’s about 0.5 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Audi Q8 e-tron is a bit faster – reaching 210 km/h, while the Volvo ES90 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 30 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q8 e-tron delivers somewhat more torque with 973 Nm compared to 870 Nm. That’s about 103 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Volvo ES90 is only slightly lighter – 2,410 kg compared to 2,585 kg. The difference is around 175 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Audi Q8 e-tron offers noticeably more boot space – 569 L compared to 424 L. That’s a difference of about 145 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Audi Q8 e-tron offers moderately more capacity – up to 1,637 L, about 210 L more than the Volvo ES90.
When it comes to payload, the Audi Q8 e-tron carries moderately more – 595 kg compared to 500 kg. That’s a difference of about 95 kg.
The Volvo ES90 comes out modestly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Audi Q8 e-tron wraps Audi’s usual premium polish into a quiet, composed electric SUV that feels refined and surprisingly effortless to drive. With a spacious, tech-forward cabin and understated road presence, it’s a practical yet stylish choice for buyers who want electric motoring without losing the dignity of a proper luxury SUV.
detailsThe Volvo ES90 stands out as a luxury sedan, embodying Scandinavian elegance combined with innovative technology. Its sleek design is complemented by a plush interior that emphasizes comfort and safety, aligning with Volvo's renowned reputation. With advanced features and a focus on sustainability, the ES90 is a testament to the brand's commitment to responsible luxury.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
65,100 - 102,800 £
|
Price
61,700 - 81,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.7 - 26.3 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.9 - 17.1 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
456 - 595 km
|
Electric Range
651 - 700 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
89 - 106 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
88 - 102 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2,585 - 2,725 kg
|
Curb weight
2,410 - 2,610 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
528 - 569 L
|
Trunk capacity
424 L
|
|
Length
4,915 mm
|
Length
5,000 mm
|
|
Width
1,937 - 1,994 mm
|
Width
1,942 mm
|
|
Height
1,617 - 1,683 mm
|
Height
1,546 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,567 - 1,637 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1,427 L
|
|
Payload
515 - 595 kg
|
Payload
490 - 500 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
340 - 503 HP
|
Power HP
333 - 680 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.5 - 6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4 - 6.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
200 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
664 - 973 Nm
|
Torque
480 - 870 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
250 - 370 kW
|
Power kW
245 - 500 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,023 - 2,024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Volvo
|