VS

BMW 4 Series Coupe vs VW Polo comparison

Compare performance (530 HP vs 207 HP), boot space and price (46,200 £ vs 17,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BMW 4 Series Coupe or VW Polo?

BMW 4 Series Coupe vs VW Polo: Key differences

BMW 4 Series Coupe

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • only slightly more efficient
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
  • markedly more trunk space
details

VW Polo

4.2 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • clearly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

4 Series Coupe

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

VW Polo is significantly cheaper – starting at 17,300 £ , while the BMW 4 Series Coupe costs 46,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 28,942 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the BMW 4 Series Coupe uses 4.8 L/100km and is only slightly more efficient than the VW Polo with 5.1 L/100km. The difference is about 0.3 L/100km.

Polo

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the BMW 4 Series Coupe offers clearly more power – delivering 530 HP compared to 207 HP. That’s roughly 323 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW 4 Series Coupe is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 3.5 s, while the VW Polo takes 6.5 s. That’s about 3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the BMW 4 Series Coupe delivers considerably more torque with 700 Nm compared to 320 Nm. That’s about 380 Nm more.

4 Series Coupe

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: VW Polo offers more seats – 5 vs 4.

In terms of curb weight, VW Polo is clearly lighter – 1,143 kg compared to 1,600 kg. The difference is around 457 kg.

Looking at boot space, the BMW 4 Series Coupe offers markedly more boot space – 440 L compared to 351 L. That’s a difference of about 89 L.

When it comes to payload, the VW Polo carries barely more – 457 kg compared to 415 kg. That’s a difference of about 42 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The BMW 4 Series Coupe holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £46,200
4 Series Coupe

BMW 4 Series Coupe

  • Engine Type Diesel MHEV, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 184 - 530 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.8 - 10 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

VW Polo
VW T-Cross
VS
The VW Polo is a nimble, wallet-friendly hatch that makes city driving and tight parking effortless, while the VW T-Cross trades the Polo’s sprightliness for SUV practicality — higher seating, a roomier boot and a more commanding road presence. Pick the Polo if you want cheap, lively motoring; …
VW Polo
VW Taigo
VS
The VW Polo is the sharp, no-nonsense hatchback that nails everyday practicality — nimble in town, economical to run and pleasantly composed on the motorway. The VW Taigo swaps a bit of luggage room and rear headroom for SUV flair, higher seating and a more eye-catching cabin, so pick the Polo for …
BMW 4 Series Coupe
VW Polo

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

BMW 4 Series Coupe

The BMW 4 Series Coupe blends aggressive styling with a driver-focused cabin, making even the humdrum commute feel like a short track day. It balances sharp handling and grown-up comfort with a dash of theatrical flair, so you get sportscar charisma without the drama of constant sacrifices.

details
P90405276_highRes_bmw-m440i-xdrive-arc
P90405284_highRes_bmw-m440i-xdrive-arc
P90405300_highRes_bmw-m440i-xdrive-arc
P90405345_highRes_bmw-m440i-xdrive-arc
P90405350_highRes_bmw-m440i-xdrive-arc

Reviews BMW 4 Series Coupe

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
Shomguy
20 Jan 2026, 13:24:39

BMW is the best

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Safety

VW Polo

The Polo is a well-built, comfortable hatchback that blends a refined cabin and composed manners into a compact package. It's easy to live with day to day, offering sensible space, tidy controls and reassuring quality that make it a practical choice for city or longer trips.

details
DB2021AU00726_medium
DB2021AU00728_medium
DB2021AU00732_medium
DB2021AU00735_medium
DB2021AU00736_medium
DB2021AU00741_medium

Reviews VW Polo

4.2 (4 Reviews)
rate
Michel
13 Jun 2026, 15:24:46

Nice, spacious car with many options available (panoramic roof and travel assist).

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Toyota Yaris
VW Polo
VS
Choosing between the Toyota Yaris and the VW Polo comes down to whether you prioritise reliability and efficiency or a more refined drive and cabin quality. Both are compact, practical hatchbacks ideal for city life, but the Yaris leans toward excellent fuel economy and low running costs while the …
VW ID.3
VW Polo
VS
Comparing the ID.3 and the Polo pits Volkswagen's all-electric compact against its conventional small hatchback, highlighting a choice between emissions-free efficiency and traditional practicality. The ID.3 emphasizes electric range, advanced tech and a spacious cabin, while the Polo offers lower …
SEAT Arona
VW Polo
VS
SEAT Arona and VW Polo go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the SEAT Arona or the VW Polo is …
Ford Puma
VW Polo
VS
Comparing the Ford Puma and the VW Polo comes down to choosing between a compact crossover that brings extra practicality and a semi-sporty feel (the Puma) and a traditional supermini that prioritizes refinement, build quality and precise handling (the VW Polo). Both are excellent everyday cars — …
VW Polo
VW ID.Polo
VS
VW Polo and VW ID.Polo go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the VW Polo or the VW ID.Polo is …
MINI MINI
VW Polo
VS
MINI MINI and VW Polo go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the MINI MINI or the VW Polo is the …
VW Golf
VW Polo
VS
The Volkswagen Golf and Volkswagen Polo are two of the brand’s best-known hatchbacks, with the Golf leaning toward greater space, refinement and tech while the Polo focuses on affordability, city-friendly size and economy. This comparison will show where the Golf justifies its extra cost and where …
Mercedes A Class
VW Polo
VS
Mercedes A Class and VW Polo go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Mercedes A Class or the …
BMW 4 Series Coupe
VW Polo

Costs and Consumption
Price
46,200 - 93,900 £
Price
17,300 - 30,800 £
Consumption L/100km
4.8 - 10 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 6.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
126 - 226 g/km
co2
116 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Coupe
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
4
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,600 - 1,895 kg
Curb weight
1,143 - 1,378 kg
Trunk capacity
440 L
Trunk capacity
351 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,852 - 1,887 mm
Width
1,751 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
355 - 415 kg
Payload
432 - 457 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
184 - 530 HP
Power HP
80 - 207 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.5 - 7.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.5 - 15.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
300 - 700 Nm
Torque
93 - 320 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
135 - 390 kW
Power kW
59 - 152 kW
Engine capacity
1,995 - 2,998 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1,984 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, F, G
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
BMW
Brand
VW
What drive types are available for the BMW 4 Series Coupe?

Available configurations include Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.