VS

BMW X2 vs Mazda CX-5 comparison

Compare performance (300 HP vs 141 HP), boot space and price (41200 £ vs 30000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BMW X2 or Mazda CX-5?

BMW X2 vs Mazda CX-5: Key differences

BMW X2

4.6 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • convincingly more power
  • significantly more efficient
  • decisively quicker from 0–100 km/h

Mazda CX-5

4.6 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeable cheaper
  • minimal lighter
  • hardly perceptible more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

X2

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mazda CX-5 has a noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 30000 £ , while the BMW X2 costs 41200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 11237 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: BMW X2 manages with 4.50 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Mazda CX-5 with 7 L. The difference is about 2.50 L per 100 km.

CX-5

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the BMW X2 has a convincingly edge – offering 300 HP compared to 141 HP. That’s roughly 159 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW X2 is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 5.40 s, while the Mazda CX-5 takes 10.50 s. That’s about 5.10 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the BMW X2 performs slight better – reaching 213 km/h, while the Mazda CX-5 tops out at 195 km/h. The difference is around 18 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: BMW X2 pulls significantly stronger with 400 Nm compared to 238 Nm. That’s about 162 Nm difference.

X2

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Mazda CX-5 is minimal lighter – 1629 kg compared to 1645 kg. The difference is around 16 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-5 offers hardly perceptible more room – 583 L compared to 560 L. That’s a difference of about 23 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-5 performs clearly perceptible better – up to 2019 L, which is about 549 L more than the BMW X2.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-5 somewhat takes the win – 601 kg compared to 510 kg. That’s a difference of about 91 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The BMW X2 sits well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Frequently compared as well

Ford Kuga
Mazda CX-5
VS
The Ford Kuga is the sensible all‑rounder — roomy, loaded with hybrid options and family-friendly tech — while the Mazda CX‑5 plays the premium card with richer materials and more engaging steering. Choose the Kuga for practicality and efficiency, the CX‑5 if you want style, refinement and a …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 stand out for their refined designs and driver-focused experiences. While the CX-5 offers a well-rounded blend of comfort and practicality, the CX-60 elevates the driving experience with its more powerful engine options and …
BMW X2
Mazda CX-5

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
from about £41,200
X2

BMW X2

  • Engine Type : Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Petrol
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 150 - 300 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.5 - 7.7 L
details

BMW X2

4.6 (1 Reviews)
rate

The BMW X2 feels like a sporty coupe dressed as an SUV, with sharp styling and a cheeky, youthful attitude that stands out in traffic. Inside it's driver-focused and compact but smartly packaged, perfect for city life and buyers who want BMW flair without the usual SUV bulk.

details
P90450420_highRes_bmw-x2-edition-xdriv
P90450433_highRes_bmw-x2-edition-xdriv
P90450439_highRes_bmw-x2-edition-xdriv
P90450445_highRes_bmw-x2-edition-xdriv
P90450459_highRes_bmw-x2-edition-xdriv

Mazda CX-5

4.6 (7 Reviews)
rate

The Mazda CX-5 blends elegant, athletic styling with a surprisingly engaging driving character, turning routine trips into small, satisfying adventures. Inside it feels thoughtfully built and comfortable, offering sensible practicality and a premium feel that punches above its price.

details
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_21 (1)
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_28
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_int_1

Reviews BMW X2

4.6 (1 Reviews)
rate
Jan
16 Dec 2025, 13:42:31

Excellent, very attractive car. Drives superbly. I previously had the XC40 — that was fine, but the BMW suits me better in pretty much every respect.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Reviews Mazda CX-5

4.6 (7 Reviews)
rate
Bengt
25 Jan 2026, 14:05:09

I've owned several Volvos, but I drive a Mazda now and would never switch back.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
BMW X2
Mazda CX-5

Costs and Consumption
Price
41200 - 59600 £
Price
30000 - 39500 £
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 7.7 L
Consumption L/100km
7 - 7.4 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
118 - 174 g/km
co2
157 - 168 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
45 L
Fuel tank capacity
56 - 58 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1645 - 1780 kg
Curb weight
1629 - 1671 kg
Trunk capacity
515 - 560 L
Trunk capacity
466 - 583 L
Length
4554 mm
Length
4690 mm
Width
1845 mm
Width
1860 mm
Height
1590 mm
Height
1695 mm
Max trunk capacity
1400 - 1470 L
Max trunk capacity
2019 L
Payload
495 - 510 kg
Payload
601 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 300 HP
Power HP
141 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.5 - 10.9 s
Max Speed
207 - 213 km/h
Max Speed
195 km/h
Torque
280 - 400 Nm
Torque
238 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
110 - 221 kW
Power kW
104 kW
Engine capacity
1499 - 1998 cm3
Engine capacity
2488 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, F
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
Brand
BMW
Brand
Mazda

Similar Comparisons

Mazda CX-5
Peugeot 3008
VS
In the competitive crossover segment, the Mazda CX-5 stands out with its sporty performance and premium interior, making it a strong contender against the stylish Peugeot 3008. While the CX-5 offers a dynamic driving experience and impressive handling, the Peugeot 3008 captivates with its sleek …
Mazda CX-5
Skoda Karoq
VS
The Mazda CX-5 courts you with a near-luxury cabin and engaging handling that turns everyday drives into something livelier, while the Skoda Karoq sticks to a sensible script — clever storage, roomy rear seats and sharp value for families. Choose the CX-5 if you want style, poise and a more premium …
Mazda CX-5
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-5 and VW Tayron offer a fascinating comparison in the compact SUV segment, each catering to distinct driver preferences. The CX-5, renowned for its engaging driving dynamics and upscale interior, promises a spirited yet comfortable ride. Meanwhile, the Tayron, with its robust build and …
Mazda CX-5
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive compact SUV market, the Mazda CX-5 stands out with its sleek design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a more spirited experience behind the wheel. Meanwhile, the Volvo XC40 charms with its robust safety features and Scandinavian-inspired interior, prioritizing comfort and …
Lexus NX
Mazda CX-5
VS
The Lexus NX stands out with its luxurious interior and advanced technology features, offering a refined driving experience that appeals to upscale buyers. In contrast, the Mazda CX-5 impresses with its sporty handling and engaging dynamics, making it a favorite among those who prioritize fun …
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer
BMW X2
VS
In the battle of versatility and style, the BMW 2 Series Active Tourer takes on the sporty flair of the BMW X2. While the Active Tourer boasts a spacious interior and practical design ideal for families, the X2 offers an athletic stance and a more dynamic driving experience. Ultimately, your choice …
BMW X2
Mercedes GLA
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the BMW X2 and Mercedes GLA stand out with their stylish designs and engaging performance. While the X2 offers a sportier driving experience with sharp handling and a distinctive coupe-like silhouette, the GLA impresses with its elegant interior and advanced …
Mazda CX-5
Suzuki Vitara
VS
In the dynamic world of compact SUVs, the Mazda CX-5 and Suzuki Vitara offer distinct appeals to different types of drivers. The Mazda CX-5 prides itself on a sophisticated design and a more engaging driving experience, thanks to its refined engine choices and upscale interior materials. Meanwhile, …
What drive types are available for the BMW X2?

The BMW X2 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.