Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Mazda CX-5 vs Nissan Qashqai - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (141 HP vs 205 HP), boot space and price (30000 £ vs 29600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-5 or Nissan Qashqai?
CX-5
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Nissan Qashqai has a minimal advantage in terms of price – it starts at 29600 £ , while the Mazda CX-5 costs 30000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 395 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Nissan Qashqai manages with 4.50 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Mazda CX-5 with 7 L. The difference is about 2.50 L per 100 km.
Qashqai
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Nissan Qashqai has a evident edge – offering 205 HP compared to 141 HP. That’s roughly 64 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Nissan Qashqai is evident quicker – completing the sprint in 7.60 s, while the Mazda CX-5 takes 10.50 s. That’s about 2.90 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Nissan Qashqai performs slight better – reaching 206 km/h, while the Mazda CX-5 tops out at 195 km/h. The difference is around 11 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Nissan Qashqai pulls noticeable stronger with 330 Nm compared to 238 Nm. That’s about 92 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
CX-5
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Nissan Qashqai is slightly lighter – 1420 kg compared to 1629 kg. The difference is around 209 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-5 offers slightly more room – 583 L compared to 504 L. That’s a difference of about 79 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-5 performs distinct better – up to 2019 L, which is about 572 L more than the Nissan Qashqai.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Nissan Qashqai sits well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Mazda CX-5
Nissan Qashqai
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £29,600
Nissan Qashqai
Mazda CX-5
4.5 (4 Reviews)
The Mazda CX-5 blends elegant, athletic styling with a surprisingly engaging driving character, turning routine trips into small, satisfying adventures. Inside it feels thoughtfully built and comfortable, offering sensible practicality and a premium feel that punches above its price.
details
Nissan Qashqai
5 (1 Reviews)
The Nissan Qashqai blends practical, family-friendly packaging with SUV styling that refuses to shout, making it a sensible and dependable choice for everyday life. It’s comfortable to live with, economical on the road, and neatly equipped enough to feel modern without ever feeling precious — perfect if you want crossover versatility without the drama.
details
Mazda CX-5
Nissan Qashqai
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
30000 - 39500 £
|
Price
29600 - 39900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
7 - 7.4 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 6.8 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
157 - 168 g/km
|
co2
102 - 154 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
56 - 58 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1629 - 1671 kg
|
Curb weight
1420 - 1665 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
583 L
|
Trunk capacity
479 - 504 L
|
|
Length
4690 mm
|
Length
4425 mm
|
|
Width
1860 mm
|
Width
1835 mm
|
|
Height
1695 mm
|
Height
1625 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
2019 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1422 - 1447 L
|
|
Payload
-
|
Payload
466 - 520 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
141 HP
|
Power HP
140 - 205 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.5 - 10.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 10.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
195 km/h
|
Max Speed
170 - 206 km/h
|
|
Torque
238 Nm
|
Torque
240 - 330 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
104 kW
|
Power kW
103 - 151 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2488 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1332 - 1498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Nissan
|
What drivetrain options does the Mazda CX-5 have?
The Mazda CX-5 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.