VS

Mazda CX-5 vs Nissan Qashqai comparison

Compare performance (141 HP vs 205 HP), boot space and price (30,000 £ vs 29,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-5 or Nissan Qashqai?

Mazda CX-5 vs Nissan Qashqai: Key differences

Mazda CX-5

4.6 (9 Reviews)
rate
details

Nissan Qashqai

4.9 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • only slightly cheaper
  • clearly more power
  • significantly more efficient
  • markedly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • slightly lighter
  • only slightly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

CX-5

Evolving Excellence: Mazda CX-5 versus Nissan Qashqai

As the automotive world continues to innovate and evolve, the compact SUV sector remains incredibly competitive. Two models that stand out in this segment are the Mazda CX-5 and the Nissan Qashqai. Both vehicles offer a blend of style, performance, and versatility, but how do they stack up against each other in terms of technical specifications, innovation, and design? Let's delve into a detailed comparison of these two popular SUVs.

Qashqai

Power and Performance

The Mazda CX-5 offers a choice between petrol MHEV and diesel engines, with power output ranging from 150 to 194 horsepower. Enthusiasts will appreciate its range of acceleration from 9.2 to 11.1 seconds in the 0-100 km/h sprint, with top speeds peaking at 208 km/h. The CX-5 also provides options for both front-wheel and all-wheel drive, ensuring adaptability across different terrains.

On the other hand, the Nissan Qashqai offers petrol MHEV and full hybrid engines with horsepower between 140 and 190. Its acceleration is slightly more responsive, with a 0-100 km/h time spanning from 7.9 to 10.2 seconds, and top speeds maxing out at 206 km/h. Like the CX-5, the Qashqai provides both front-wheel and all-wheel drive options, offering similar versatility.

CX-5

Fuel Efficiency and Environment

Fuel consumption is a critical factor for many drivers. The Mazda CX-5 offers a consumption range of 5.6 to 7.6 L/100km, paired with emissions from 146 to 173 g/km. It holds an E to F CO2 efficiency classification.

Meanwhile, the Nissan Qashqai demonstrates slightly superior fuel efficiency with consumption figures between 5.1 and 6.8 L/100km, and CO2 emissions ranging from 116 to 154 g/km, earning it a D to E class in efficiency.

Qashqai

Dimensions and Practicality

In terms of size, the Mazda CX-5 measures at 4575 mm in length, 1845 mm in width, and 1680 mm in height. Its cargo space ranges up to 522 liters, catering well to families and adventure lovers alike.

The Nissan Qashqai is slightly more compact at 4425 mm in length, 1835 mm in width, and 1625 mm in height. However, it does not compromise too much on space, offering a trunk capacity up to 504 liters.

CX-5

Innovation and Technology

Both vehicles feature advanced technological offerings. The CX-5 is renowned for its luxurious interior and user-friendly infotainment with high-quality finishes that speak to Mazda's philosophy of driver-centric design.

Conversely, the Nissan Qashqai embraces cutting-edge technology with its full hybrid system, providing a smooth driving experience and fuel efficiency. Its interior showcases a modern design, complete with state-of-the-art connectivity options and driver-assist systems.

Qashqai

Conclusion

Deciding between the Mazda CX-5 and the Nissan Qashqai ultimately hinges on the priorities of the individual driver. The CX-5 leans towards those who value traditional luxury and driving performance, while the Qashqai prioritizes modern efficiency and technological innovation. Both vehicles continue to redefine what is possible in the compact SUV segment, offering a comprehensive package for the discerning motorist.

Frequently compared as well

Nissan Qashqai
VW T-Roc
VS
The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, family-friendly compact SUV — roomy, quietly comfortable and packed with practical tech for long motorway miles. The VW T-Roc swaps a little rear-seat space for cheeky styling and sharper handling, so if you want personality and a bit more driver engagement it’s …
Nissan Qashqai
Volvo XC40
VS
The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, hard-working compact SUV that delivers excellent everyday comfort, clever interior space and strong value for money — perfect if you want a reliable family car without the premium price tag. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, is a sharper, more upscale choice with a …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-5

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Nissan Qashqai is only slightly cheaper – starting at 29,600 £ , while the Mazda CX-5 costs 30,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 386 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Nissan Qashqai uses 4.3 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Mazda CX-5 with 7 L/100km. The difference is about 2.7 L/100km.

Qashqai

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Nissan Qashqai offers clearly more power – delivering 205 HP compared to 141 HP. That’s roughly 64 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Nissan Qashqai is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.6 s, while the Mazda CX-5 takes 10.5 s. That’s about 2.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Nissan Qashqai delivers noticeably more torque with 330 Nm compared to 238 Nm. That’s about 92 Nm more.

CX-5

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Nissan Qashqai is slightly lighter – 1,420 kg compared to 1,629 kg. The difference is around 209 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Nissan Qashqai offers only slightly more boot space – 504 L compared to 466 L. That’s a difference of about 38 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-5 carries somewhat more – 601 kg compared to 516 kg. That’s a difference of about 85 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Nissan Qashqai is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £29,600
Qashqai

Nissan Qashqai

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 158 - 205 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.3 - 6.8 L/100km
details
Mazda CX-5
Nissan Qashqai

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-5

The Mazda CX-5 blends sporty handling with a refined, premium interior, making everyday driving feel engaging and comfortable. It pairs stylish design and thoughtful cabin materials with user-friendly tech to deliver a well-rounded compact SUV that suits drivers who want more driver involvement without sacrificing practicality.

details
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_21 (1)
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_28
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_int_1

Reviews Mazda CX-5

4.6 (9 Reviews)
rate
Marc Adriaans
4 Jun 2026, 13:04:31

I've been driving Mazdas for about ten years now without problems and with a lot of enjoyment. The last 3.5 years in a CX‑5. A really nice, smooth car that can tow quite a bit too, although I wouldn't recommend doing that with the FWD because it lacks grip on the front axle — so if you fit a towbar always choose the AWD. The only downside I can think of, after long consideration, is... nothing 🤔

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Bengt
25 Jan 2026, 14:05:09

I've owned several Volvos, but I drive a Mazda now and would never switch back.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Nissan Qashqai

The Nissan Qashqai is a compact crossover that blends everyday practicality with a comfortable, composed driving experience and a smart, well finished interior. It feels sensible and versatile for city life and longer trips, appealing to buyers who want a reliable, low fuss family car.

details
13. New refreshed Qashqai 2024 in fuji sunset color driving on the road in Faro, Portugal
3. New refreshed Qashqai 2024 in fuji sunset color driving on the road in Faro, Portugal
9-High
All-New Nissan Qashqai - Interior 32

Reviews Nissan Qashqai

4.9 (4 Reviews)
rate
karol
3 Jun 2026, 20:17:58

Great car — it has everything you need. Others are still learning, e.g. folding mirrors, a double trunk, and it's well soundproofed.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Nissan Qashqai
Renault Captur
VS
The Nissan Qashqai stays the sensible family favourite — roomier, better built and more composed on the motorway, so it’s the pick if you value comfort and practicality without drama. The Renault Captur, meanwhile, charms with bolder styling, clever packaging and nippier city manners (usually for …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 helps you decide between a practical, well-rounded compact SUV and a more spacious, premium model that offers stronger engines and available plug-in hybrid technology. The CX-5 is ideal for buyers prioritizing value, comfort and lower running costs, while …
Mazda CX-5
VW Tayron
VS
Choosing between the Mazda CX-5 and the Volkswagen Tayron means picking either Mazda’s engaging, driver-focused compact SUV or Volkswagen’s more conservative, comfort- and tech-oriented Tayron. Below I’ll compare design, driving feel, interior quality, practicality and features so you can quickly …
MG ZS
Nissan Qashqai
VS
Cheap and cheerful, the MG ZS punches above its price with a roomy, gadget-heavy cabin and surprisingly sprightly electric options, while the Nissan Qashqai feels more grown-up — quieter, better driven and tougher to fault on long motorway runs. Pick the ZS if you want maximum kit for your money; …
Nissan Qashqai
Opel Grandland
VS
The Nissan Qashqai feels sharper on the road with refined handling and clever packaging, while the Opel Grandland answers with a roomier cabin and bolder looks that’ll please practical families. Pick the Qashqai for polished tech and a composed daily drive, choose the Grandland if you want more …
BYD Seal U
Nissan Qashqai
VS
The BYD Seal U storms in as a slick, electric fastback that outpoints the Qashqai on pace, tech and running costs, while the Nissan Qashqai stays sensible with higher ride height, roomy practicality and a pedigree for reliability. If you crave EV performance and futuristic cabin kit — and can live …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The trusted Mazda CX-5 takes on the new, electrified Mazda CX-6e in a straight-up duel of everyday usability, driving feel and running costs. We drive them back-to-back to see which one gives you the sharper handling, smarter packaging and better value for your money — and which is just prettier on …
Nissan Qashqai
Renault Symbioz
VS
Comparing the Nissan Qashqai with the Renault Symbioz highlights a clash between a proven compact crossover and Renault's forward-looking Symbioz concept that showcases the brand's electric and connected ambitions. This comparison will focus on how they differ in design, practicality and technology …
Mazda CX-5
Nissan Qashqai

Costs and Consumption
Price
30,000 - 39,500 £
Price
29,600 - 39,900 £
Consumption L/100km
7 - 7.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.3 - 6.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
157 - 169 g/km
co2
98 - 152 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,629 - 1,671 kg
Curb weight
1,420 - 1,624 kg
Trunk capacity
466 L
Trunk capacity
479 - 504 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,860 mm
Width
1,835 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
566 - 601 kg
Payload
446 - 516 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
141 HP
Power HP
158 - 205 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.5 - 10.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 9.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
238 Nm
Torque
260 - 330 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
104 kW
Power kW
116 - 151 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,498 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Nissan
Is the Mazda CX-5 offered with different drivetrains?

The Mazda CX-5 is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.