Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: BMW X5 or Land Rover Range Rover Velar?
The luxury SUV segment is fiercely competitive, with automakers vying for the perfect blend of performance, comfort, and innovation. Two worthy contenders in this category are the BMW X5 and the Land Rover Range Rover Velar. Let's dive into the technical aspects and innovations that set these vehicles apart from each other.
Under the hood, both the BMW X5 and Range Rover Velar boast a variety of engine types, from diesel MHEV (Mild Hybrid Electric Vehicle) and petrol MHEV options to plugin hybrids. The BMW X5 offers a wide range of power outputs, from 298 HP to a staggering 625 HP. This power translates to impressive acceleration, with the fastest model achieving 0-100 km/h in just 3.9 seconds. The Velar, on the other hand, offers power ranging from 204 HP to 404 HP, reaching 0-100 km/h in a competitive 5.4 seconds.
In terms of fuel efficiency, the BMW X5's plugin hybrid variant offers an exceptional consumption rate of only 0.9 L/100 km and boasts an electric range of 97 km, thanks to its 25.7 kWh battery. In contrast, the Range Rover Velar's plugin hybrid offers fuel consumption of 1.9 L/100 km with an electric range of 61 km, driven by a 15.4 kWh battery. Although both vehicles strive for eco-friendliness, the BMW X5 takes the lead in electric driving range and battery capacity.
When it comes to size, the BMW X5 measures between 4935 mm and 4948 mm in length, with a width of 2004 mm to 2015 mm and a height of 1765 mm to 1762 mm. The Range Rover Velar is slightly more compact, stretching 4797 mm in length, 1933 mm in width, and standing 1657 mm to 1665 mm tall. Both SUVs provide ample space with the X5 offering up to 650 liters of trunk capacity compared to the Velar's 552 liters. This makes the BMW a slightly better option for those prioritizing cargo space.
Both SUVs come equipped with cutting-edge technology designed to enhance driving experience and comfort. BMW's X5 features advanced driver assistance systems, a high-definition display for the infotainment system, and customizable driving modes that adapt to various terrains and preferences. The Range Rover Velar is no slouch in this department, offering a sleek dual-screen setup for infotainment and climate control, Terrain Response 2 technology for off-road adventures, and an array of safety features.
In terms of pricing, both SUVs cater to the premium market, where quality comes at a cost. However, the value is evident in the comprehensive packages they provide, from powerful engines and sustainable options to state-of-the-art technology and luxurious interiors.
The choice between the BMW X5 and the Range Rover Velar largely comes down to personal preferences and priorities. If electric range, power variety, and trunk capacity are decisive factors, the BMW X5 might be the better fit. However, for those who seek a bold design, advanced off-road capabilities, and a technology-laden cabin, the Range Rover Velar stands out. Both represent excellent choices in the premium SUV sector, offering the reliability and luxury that these brands are known for.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has a distinct advantage in terms of price – it starts at 61900 £, while the BMW X5 costs 77100 £. That’s a price difference of around 15172 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: BMW X5 manages with 3 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Land Rover Range Rover Velar with 4.80 L. The difference is about 1.80 L per 100 km.
As for range, the BMW X5 performs evident better – achieving up to 105 km, about 42 km more than the Land Rover Range Rover Velar.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the BMW X5 has a evident edge – offering 625 HP compared to 404 HP. That’s roughly 221 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW X5 is noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 3.90 s, while the Land Rover Range Rover Velar takes 5.40 s. That’s about 1.50 s faster.
There’s no difference in top speed – both reach 250 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: BMW X5 pulls somewhat stronger with 750 Nm compared to 650 Nm. That’s about 100 Nm difference.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Land Rover Range Rover Velar is slightly lighter – 2003 kg compared to 2240 kg. The difference is around 237 kg.
In terms of boot space, the BMW X5 offers to a small extent more room – 650 L compared to 552 L. That’s a difference of about 98 L.
In maximum load capacity, the BMW X5 performs distinct better – up to 1870 L, which is about 512 L more than the Land Rover Range Rover Velar.
When it comes to payload, BMW X5 a bit takes the win – 705 kg compared to 587 kg. That’s a difference of about 118 kg.
The BMW X5 proves to be leaves the rival little chance and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
BMW X5 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
@ BMW Group Press
The BMW X5 blends athletic handling with a roomy, premium interior, feeling equally at home on twisty country roads and the school-run car park. Its executive-lounge cabin and confident road presence make it a tempting choice for buyers who want comfort, capability and just a little bit of bragging rights.
details
@ BMW Group Press
@ BMW Group Press
@ BMW Group Press
@ BMW Group Press
@ BMW Group Press
The Land Rover Range Rover Velar exemplifies a harmonious blend of elegance and capability, capturing the essence of modern luxury SUVs. Its sleek silhouette and refined design details make it stand out on both urban roads and off-road adventures. Inside, the Velar offers an impeccably crafted interior, combining premium materials with cutting-edge technology for a sophisticated driving experience.
details
@ Jaguar Land Rover Media
@ Jaguar Land Rover Media
@ Jaguar Land Rover Media
@ Jaguar Land Rover Media
|
@ BMW Group Press
|
@ Jaguar Land Rover Media
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
77100 - 143500 £
|
Price
61900 - 87400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3 - 12.8 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.8 - 10.2 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
105 km
|
Electric Range
63 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
25.70 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
15.40 kWh
|
|
co2
68 - 289 g/km
|
co2
110 - 232 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
69 - 83 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
62 - 83 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2240 - 2495 kg
|
Curb weight
2003 - 2280 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
500 - 650 L
|
Trunk capacity
503 - 552 L
|
|
Length
4935 - 4948 mm
|
Length
4797 mm
|
|
Width
2004 - 2015 mm
|
Width
1933 mm
|
|
Height
1755 - 1765 mm
|
Height
1657 - 1665 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1720 - 1870 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1335 - 1358 L
|
|
Payload
565 - 705 kg
|
Payload
460 - 587 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
298 - 625 HP
|
Power HP
204 - 404 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 6.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
233 - 250 km/h
|
Max Speed
209 - 250 km/h
|
|
Torque
540 - 750 Nm
|
Torque
430 - 650 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
6 - 8
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
|
Power kW
219 - 460 kW
|
Power kW
150 - 297 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2993 - 4395 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1997 - 2997 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, C
|
|
Brand
BMW
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
The BMW X5 is available as All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España