Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
BMW XM vs Land Rover Range Rover – Which model is better for everyday use?
Two cars, one duel: BMW XM meets Land Rover Range Rover.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!
XM
@ BMW Group Press
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
BMW XM has a barely noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 114700 £, while the Land Rover Range Rover costs 122700 £. That’s a price difference of around 8057 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: BMW XM manages with 1.40 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Land Rover Range Rover with 2.70 L. The difference is about 1.30 L per 100 km.
As for range, the Land Rover Range Rover performs evident better – achieving up to 117 km, about 32 km more than the BMW XM.
Range Rover
@ Jaguar Land Rover Media
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the BMW XM has a to a small extent edge – offering 748 HP compared to 615 HP. That’s roughly 133 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW XM is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 3.80 s, while the Land Rover Range Rover takes 4.50 s. That’s about 0.70 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Land Rover Range Rover performs barely noticeable better – reaching 261 km/h, while the BMW XM tops out at 250 km/h. The difference is around 11 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: BMW XM pulls to a small extent stronger with 1000 Nm compared to 800 Nm. That’s about 200 Nm difference.
XM
@ BMW Group Press
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 7 people.
In curb weight, Land Rover Range Rover is hardly perceptible lighter – 2504 kg compared to 2695 kg. The difference is around 191 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Land Rover Range Rover offers evident more room – 818 L compared to 527 L. That’s a difference of about 291 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Land Rover Range Rover performs to a small extent better – up to 2176 L, which is about 356 L more than the BMW XM.
When it comes to payload, Land Rover Range Rover noticeable takes the win – 846 kg compared to 525 kg. That’s a difference of about 321 kg.
Who wins the race?
The BMW XM proves to be dominates this comparison and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
BMW XM is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £114,700
@ BMW Group Press
BMW XM
BMW XM
The BMW XM represents a bold foray into the high-performance luxury SUV market with its striking design and powerful hybrid drive. This model melds cutting-edge technology with opulence, offering an unparalleled driving experience. Its interior is meticulously crafted, providing both driver and passengers with supreme comfort and innovative connectivity features.
details
@ BMW Group Press
@ BMW Group Press
@ BMW Group Press
@ BMW Group Press
Land Rover Range Rover
The Land Rover Range Rover epitomises luxury and capability in the realms of off-road vehicles. Its elegant design seamlessly marries sophistication with ruggedness, making it equally suitable for urban environments and challenging terrains. Inside, passengers are treated to a plush interior with premium materials and cutting-edge technology that ensure a comfortable and connected driving experience.
details
@ Jaguar Land Rover Media
@ Jaguar Land Rover Media
@ Jaguar Land Rover Media
@ Jaguar Land Rover Media
BMW XM
Land Rover Range Rover
|
@ BMW Group Press
|
@ Jaguar Land Rover Media
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
114700 - 157200 £
|
Price
122700 - 244700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.4 - 2 L
|
Consumption L/100km
2.7 - 11.7 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
82 - 85 km
|
Electric Range
116 - 117 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
25.70 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
31.80 kWh
|
|
co2
31 - 44 g/km
|
co2
62 - 265 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
69 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
71 - 90 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Off-Roader
|
|
Seats
7
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2695 - 2795 kg
|
Curb weight
2504 - 2810 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
527 L
|
Trunk capacity
212 - 818 L
|
|
Length
5110 mm
|
Length
5052 - 5258 mm
|
|
Width
2005 mm
|
Width
2047 mm
|
|
Height
1755 mm
|
Height
1870 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1820 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1841 - 2176 L
|
|
Payload
505 - 525 kg
|
Payload
589 - 846 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
476 - 748 HP
|
Power HP
300 - 615 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 5.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.5 - 6.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
250 km/h
|
Max Speed
218 - 261 km/h
|
|
Torque
700 - 1000 Nm
|
Torque
650 - 800 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
6 - 8
|
Number of Cylinders
6 - 8
|
|
Power kW
350 - 550 kW
|
Power kW
221 - 452 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2998 - 4395 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2997 - 4395 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, G
|
|
Brand
BMW
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
What drive types are available for the BMW XM?
The BMW XM is available as All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.