VS

Citroen Jumper vs Mercedes Vito Transporter comparison

Compare performance (279 HP vs 237 HP), boot space and price (55,100 £ vs 28,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Citroen Jumper or Mercedes Vito Transporter?

Citroen Jumper vs Mercedes Vito Transporter: Key differences

Citroen Jumper

  • a bit more power
details

Mercedes Vito Transporter

  • substantially cheaper
  • clearly more efficient
  • slightly more electric range
  • substantially lighter
details

By Achim Sedelmaier

Jumper

Citroën Jumper vs. Mercedes Vito Transporter: A Comprehensive Comparison

The world of cargo vans has evolved with increasing demands for efficiency, power, and versatility. In this comparative analysis, we dive into the specifics of two leading contenders: the Citroën Jumper and the Mercedes Vito Transporter. These models have each carved their niche in the market, offering distinct features catering to various needs.

Vito Transporter

Engine Options and Performance

The Citroën Jumper embraces both electric and diesel powertrains, offering a range of options from 120 to 270 horsepower. It comes with front-wheel drive and has multiple transmission choices, including reduction, manual, and automatic gearboxes. Notably, the electric variant of the Jumper boasts a strong 97.8 kWh battery with an impressive range of up to 424 km.

On the other hand, the Mercedes Vito Transporter exhibits versatility with its diesel and electric engine options. It ranges from 102 to 237 horsepower and offers rear, front, and all-wheel drive configurations. Its electric models are equipped with a 60 kWh battery, supporting a range of about 310-313 km.

Fuel Efficiency and Consumption

The Citroën Jumper, particularly its diesel versions, presents a consumption range of 7.5 to 9 L/100km, and its electric variant uses approximately 26.2 kWh/100km. This makes it a solid choice for those emphasizing environmental considerations without sacrificing power.

The Mercedes Vito Transporter claims an efficient consumption of 6.8 to 7.9 L/100km for its diesel models, which aligns well with its class. The electric versions of the Vito offer a more frugal consumption than the Jumper, with figures of 20.7 to 21.1 kWh/100km, making it an economical option over long distances.

Design and Dimensions

The Citroën Jumper emphasizes functional design with lengths ranging from 5413 to 6363 mm and a maximum height of around 2779 mm. These dimensions highlight its capacity to carry substantial loads, enhanced by a notably high payload capacity of up to 2020 kg.

In contrast, the Mercedes Vito is somewhat more compact, with lengths varying from 4895 to 5370 mm and a maximum height of 1945 mm. It supports a payload maximum of around 1000 kg, making it ideal for urban environments where maneuverability is crucial.

Interior Comfort and Features

Inside, the Citroën Jumper prioritizes utility, offering 3 seats suitable for a work-friendly environment. The configurable cargo space is a boon for businesses that demand flexible loading solutions.

The Mercedes Vito, offering an option for 2 or 5 seats, provides an edge in versatility and comfort, catering well to diverse needs ranging from logistics to passenger transport, especially with enhanced cabin design and a focus on ride quality.

Environmental Impact

With the increasing importance of CO2 emissions, both the Citroën Jumper and Mercedes Vito provide efficient solutions. The Jumper offers emissions as low as 0 g/km for the electric version, while its diesel counterpart holds varying outputs up to 233 g/km.

Similarly, the Vito boasts a lower emissions range with the electric model hitting 0 g/km, and its diesel engines maintain a range of 178 to 206 g/km, indicating well-balanced environmental considerations.

Conclusion

The choice between the Citroën Jumper and the Mercedes Vito Transporter hinges on specific needs. The Jumper excels with its spacious design and higher payload capacity, ideal for businesses with heavy-duty transporting needs. Conversely, the Vito stands out for its efficiency and maneuverability, making it a fitting choice for urban logistics and versatility.

When selecting between these two, consideration of driving environment, load requirements, and emphasis on either consumption efficiency or payload capability will guide the optimal choice for your needs.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Jumper

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mercedes Vito Transporter is substantially cheaper – starting at 28,800 £ , while the Citroen Jumper costs 55,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 26,298 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Mercedes Vito Transporter is clearly more efficient: consuming 21.2 kWh/100km compared to 26.2 kWh/100km for the Citroen Jumper. That’s a difference of about 5 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Mercedes Vito Transporter offers slightly more range – reaching up to 474 km, about 50 km more than the Citroen Jumper.

Vito Transporter

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Citroen Jumper offers a bit more power – delivering 279 HP compared to 237 HP. That’s roughly 42 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes Vito Transporter delivers a bit more torque with 500 Nm compared to 410 Nm. That’s about 90 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Mercedes Vito Transporter offers more seats – 5 vs 3.

In terms of curb weight, Mercedes Vito Transporter is substantially lighter – 1,916 kg compared to 2,865 kg. The difference is around 949 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Citroen Jumper carries markedly more – 1,385 kg compared to 884 kg. That’s a difference of about 501 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mercedes Vito Transporter stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £28,800
Vito Transporter

Mercedes Vito Transporter

  • Engine Type : Diesel, Electric, Petrol
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 102 - 237 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 6.8 - 9.7 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 21.2 - 26.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 304 - 474 km
Citroen Jumper
Mercedes Vito Transporter

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Citroen Jumper

The Citroen Jumper is a no-nonsense workhorse that swaps flash for sheer practicality, with a spacious load area and composed, user-friendly driving manners that make busy workdays easier. It won’t win any beauty contests, but its sensible packaging, comfortable cab and wallet-friendly running make it a compelling choice for tradespeople and small businesses.

details

Mercedes Vito Transporter

The Mercedes Vito Transporter is a supremely practical workhorse that blends Mercedes refinement with van-like utility, making long days on the road feel surprisingly civilized. With a cleverly thought-out interior and a drive that won’t wear you out, the Vito is the ideal choice for businesses that want capability without sacrificing comfort — and yes, it still looks sharper than most vans at a client meeting.

details
Citroen Jumper
Mercedes Vito Transporter

Costs and Consumption

Price
55,100 - 57,800 £
Price
28,800 - 51,600 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
6.8 - 9.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
26.2 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
21.2 - 26.5 kWh/100km
Electric Range
424 km
Electric Range
304 - 474 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
60 - 90 kWh
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 - 222 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
57 - 70 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Cargo Van
Body Type
Cargo Van
Seats
3
Seats
2 - 5
Doors
-
Doors
4
Curb weight
2,865 - 2,940 kg
Curb weight
1,916 - 2,518 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
4,895 - 5,390 mm
Width
2,050 mm
Width
1,928 mm
Height
-
Height
1,910 - 1,945 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
3,100 - 6,600 L
Payload
560 - 1,385 kg
Payload
547 - 884 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric, Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
279 HP
Power HP
102 - 237 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
120 - 140 km/h
Torque
410 Nm
Torque
270 - 500 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
205 kW
Power kW
75 - 174 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,950 - 1,999 cm3

General

Model Year
2024
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
Brand
Citroen
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.