Ferrari SF90 Roadster vs Alpine A110 comparison

Q: How powerful is the Ferrari SF90 Roadster's engine?

Up to 1,000 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

Q: What are the consumption figures for the Ferrari SF90 Roadster in liters per 100 km?

On average, the Ferrari SF90 Roadster consumes 6.5 L/100km.

Q: What is the electric driving range of the Ferrari SF90 Roadster?

Depending on equipment, the WLTP range reaches up to 25 km.

Q: What maximum speed does the Ferrari SF90 Roadster reach?

Depending on the model, top speed is 340 km/h.

Q: What are the Ferrari SF90 Roadster’s length, width and height?

The Ferrari SF90 Roadster measures 4,704 mm long, 1,973 mm wide and 1,186 mm high.

Q: What drive types are available for the Alpine A110?

The Alpine A110 is available as Rear-Wheel Drive.

Q: What is the maximum horsepower of the Alpine A110?

Up to 345 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

Q: What is the fuel consumption of the Alpine A110 according to the manufacturer?

On average, the Alpine A110 consumes 6.7 L/100km.

SF90 Roadster

Alpine A110 VS Ferrari SF90 Roadster — crisp editorial comparison

Alpine A110 VS Ferrari SF90 Roadster sets up a clash of philosophies: a light, analogue mid‑engine coupé against an open, hyper‑hybrid Ferrari that stages its drama in megawatts and software. The Alpine A110 pitches a low‑mass, driver‑centred experience that feels intimate and forgiving on real roads, while the Ferrari SF90 Roadster insists on spectacular, all‑wheel shove and a technical feel that dominates the show. Those searching this page want to know which character suits daily life, not just who is faster on paper. Read on for how each car treats comfort, practicality, cabin feel and the real trade‑offs you’ll encounter in ownership. This preview frames the practical contrasts before the detailed technical comparison that follows.

A110

Driving character: nimble flow versus hyper‑charged thrust

The Alpine A110 is all about low mass and steering precision — it changes direction with a lightness that encourages cornering at realistic speeds without drama, so country roads feel like the car’s natural habitat. The Ferrari SF90 Roadster delivers an entirely different sensation: instant, overpowering acceleration and all‑wheel traction that make it feel like a controlled missile rather than a nimble plaything. In everyday driving the A110’s feedback and predictability make it easier to extract enjoyment without needing extreme speed, whereas the SF90’s hybrid systems and torque vectoring create a more technological, sometimes weighty connection to the tarmac. If you prize delicacy and a playful chassis, the Alpine will reward you; if you want unapologetic, electrified thrust and stability at any speed, the Ferrari is the spectacle. Both are thrilling, but they thrill for different reasons and demand different driving styles.

Comfort and long‑distance behavior: surprising strengths, different compromises

On long trips the Alpine A110 surprises by being softer and less tiring than its sporty stance suggests: its suspension soaks bumps in a way that keeps driver fatigue down and maintains composure on imperfect surfaces. The Ferrari SF90 Roadster, despite extreme performance, can be an effective long‑distance GT when spec’d with comfort options and with the roof closed — its hybridization also allows short silent electric stretches in town. Open‑top running in the SF90 however requires the right conditions and speeds to avoid intrusive wind or drivetrain noise; the Alpine’s fixed roof keeps a steadier acoustic environment. Both cars have trade‑offs for extended travel: Alpine trades raw speed for calmness and ease, while the SF90 trades predictability for high‑speed serenity that comes at a cost and with occasional compromises when the top is down. Choose based on whether you value cushioned everyday travel or high‑speed, dramatic GT cruising.

Practicality and daily usability: small‑car cleverness versus hypercar limits

Practicality is where the Alpine A110 often feels more sensible: its compact footprint, lower weight and two usable luggage compartments make weekend trips with soft bags realistic and city parking less stressful. The Ferrari SF90 Roadster, for all its capability, exposes the penalties of hybrid hypercar packaging — storage is minimal, the car is wider and trickier in tight urban spaces, and living with it daily often means accepting frequent option upgrades like lift systems. Both are strict two‑seat cars, but the Alpine’s approach is oriented toward modest, real‑world utility while the Ferrari prioritizes performance packaging over cargo convenience. In town, the Alpine’s smaller scale and gentler manners are easier to live with; in contrast, the SF90 requires a different mindset and preparation if you want to avoid daily annoyances. Practical buyers will see the Alpine as the more usable sports car; performance‑first buyers will accept the Ferrari’s compromises for its unique capabilities.

Cabin feel and perceived quality: analogue character versus high‑tech luxury

Step into the Alpine A110 and you feel a driver‑focused, slightly Spartan cabin where tactile controls and a low seating position emphasize engagement rather than luxury pretence. The Ferrari SF90 Roadster’s interior reads as a technological showcase: highly finished materials and a dramatic layout communicate premium craftsmanship, but the HMI is dense and demands adaptation. That creates a clear split — Alpine’s pared‑back ergonomics feel honest and immediately familiar, while Ferrari’s richly appointed cabin feels more aspirational but also busier to use. Both have limited storage and sporty seating, yet they signal different values: Alpine prioritises purity and ergonomics, Ferrari prioritises spectacle and material excellence. Your choice here depends on whether you prefer straightforward, feel‑forward driving or a luxurious, high‑tech cockpit that requires a learning curve.

Buyer fit and trade‑offs: who each car really suits before the specs

If you want a sports car that’s easy to live with, delights on twisty B‑roads and keeps running costs and daily friction reasonable, the Alpine A110 is the naturally fitting choice — it rewards drivers who value balance, lightness and everyday usability. The Ferrari SF90 Roadster targets buyers who want open‑top hypercar performance, advanced hybrid technology and the status of cutting‑edge engineering, and who are prepared for much higher purchase and running costs plus packaging compromises. Neither car is family transport; the Alpine bends toward drivers who will use their car as a focused daily and weekend companion, while the SF90 appeals to those who want weekend drama, tech bragging rights and GT stability at high speed. The technical comparison that follows will lay out the specific engineering differences so you can match those real‑world impressions to the numbers behind them.

Frequently compared as well

Alpine A110

Lotus Emira

VS

Alpine A110 and Lotus Emira go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.

Alpine A110

Mazda MX-5 Roadster

VS

Alpine A110 and Mazda MX-5 Roadster go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

SF90 Roadster

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Alpine A110 is significantly cheaper – starting at 55,200 £ , while the Ferrari SF90 Roadster costs 409,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 354,472 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ferrari SF90 Roadster uses 6.5 L/100km and is marginally more efficient than the Alpine A110 with 6.7 L/100km. The difference is about 0.2 L/100km.

A110

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Ferrari SF90 Roadster offers substantially more power – delivering 1,000 HP compared to 345 HP. That’s roughly 655 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ferrari SF90 Roadster is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 2.5 s, while the Alpine A110 takes 3.8 s. That’s about 1.3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ferrari SF90 Roadster delivers clearly more torque with 1,066 Nm compared to 420 Nm. That’s about 646 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 2 people.

In terms of curb weight, Alpine A110 is significantly lighter – 1,150 kg compared to 1,670 kg. The difference is around 520 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Alpine A110 offers markedly more boot space – 96 L compared to 74 L. That’s a difference of about 22 L.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Alpine A110 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Reviews Ferrari SF90 Roadster

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Reviews Alpine A110

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Alpine A110

Renault Captur

VS

Alpine A110 and Renault Captur go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.

Alpine A110

Toyota RAV4

VS

Unsure whether the Alpine A110 or the Toyota RAV4 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.

Alpine A110

BMW 2 Series

VS

Alpine A110 and BMW 2 Series go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.

Alpine A110

BMW 3 Series Saloon

VS

The Alpine A110 and BMW 3 Series Saloon compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.

Alpine A110

Porsche Cayman

VS

Alpine A110 and Porsche Cayman go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.

Alpine A110

Porsche Boxster

VS

Alpine A110 and Porsche Boxster go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.

Alpine A110

BYD Seal

VS

The Alpine A110 and BYD Seal compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.

Fiat Scudo

Ferrari SF90 Roadster

VS

Unsure whether the Fiat Scudo or the Ferrari SF90 Roadster is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.

Costs and Consumption
Price 409,700 £	Price 55,200 - 282,900 £
Consumption L/100km 6.5 L/100km	Consumption L/100km 6.7 - 6.9 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range 25 km	Electric Range -
Battery Capacity -	Battery Capacity -
co2 169 g/km	co2 152 - 157 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 68 L	Fuel tank capacity -

Dimensions and Body
Body Type Roadster	Body Type Coupe
Seats 2	Seats 2
Doors 2	Doors -
Curb weight 1,670 kg	Curb weight 1,150 - 1,194 kg
Trunk capacity 74 L	Trunk capacity 96 L
Length 4,704 mm	Length -
Width 1,973 mm	Width 1,798 mm
Height 1,186 mm	Height -
Max trunk capacity -	Max trunk capacity -
Payload -	Payload 166 - 210 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Plugin Hybrid	Engine Type Petrol
Transmission Automatic	Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Dual-Clutch Automatic	Transmission Detail Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type All-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP 1,000 HP	Power HP 252 - 345 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 2.5 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 3.8 - 4.5 s
Max Speed 340 km/h	Max Speed -
Torque 1,066 Nm	Torque 320 - 420 Nm
Number of Cylinders 8	Number of Cylinders 4
Power kW 735 kW	Power kW 185 - 254 kW
Engine capacity 3,990 cm3	Engine capacity 1,798 cm3

General
Model Year 2021	Model Year 2024
CO2 Efficiency Class F	CO2 Efficiency Class F, E
Brand Ferrari	Brand Alpine

Ferrari SF90 Roadster vs Alpine A110: Key differences