VS

Ford Bronco vs Rolls-Royce Cullinan comparison

Compare performance (335 HP vs 600 HP), boot space and price (58,200 £ vs 275,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Bronco or Rolls-Royce Cullinan?

Ford Bronco vs Rolls-Royce Cullinan: Key differences

Ford Bronco

  • significantly cheaper
  • significantly more efficient
  • a bit lighter
  • marginally more trunk space
details

Rolls-Royce Cullinan

  • significantly more power
  • visibly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Bronco

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Ford Bronco is significantly cheaper – starting at 58,200 £ , while the Rolls-Royce Cullinan costs 275,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 217,158 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Bronco uses 11.3 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Rolls-Royce Cullinan with 16 L/100km. The difference is about 4.7 L/100km.

Cullinan

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan offers significantly more power – delivering 600 HP compared to 335 HP. That’s roughly 265 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Ford Bronco takes 6.7 s. That’s about 1.8 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Rolls-Royce Cullinan delivers clearly more torque with 900 Nm compared to 563 Nm. That’s about 337 Nm more.

Bronco

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Bronco is a bit lighter – 2,289 kg compared to 2,660 kg. The difference is around 371 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Ford Bronco offers marginally more boot space – 562 L compared to 555 L. That’s a difference of about 7 L.

When it comes to payload, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan carries clearly more – 840 kg compared to 411 kg. That’s a difference of about 429 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Bronco holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £58,200
Bronco

Ford Bronco

  • Engine Type Petrol
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 335 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 11.3 - 12.7 L/100km
Ford Bronco
Rolls-Royce Cullinan

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Bronco

The Ford Bronco is a go-anywhere SUV that wraps rugged off-road capability in retro looks and modern tech, promising weekend warriors a grin from first mud splash to last campfire. With removable roofs and doors, a surprisingly polished cabin for everyday life and a wide range of trims, it’s as happy tackling trails as it is turning heads on the school run — adventure with attitude.

details

Rolls-Royce Cullinan

The Cullinan seamlessly combines the hallmark luxury of Rolls-Royce with the rugged versatility of an SUV, making it a true standout in the automotive landscape. Its impeccably crafted interior envelops passengers in a serene atmosphere, complemented by advanced technology and unparalleled comfort. With its commanding presence on the road, the Cullinan redefines what it means to travel in style without compromising on capability.

details
Ford Bronco
Rolls-Royce Cullinan

Costs and Consumption

Price
58,200 - 60,000 £
Price
275,400 - 324,600 £
Consumption L/100km
11.3 - 12.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
16 - 16.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
257 - 288 g/km
co2
363 - 380 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Off-Roader
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,289 - 2,418 kg
Curb weight
2,660 kg
Trunk capacity
504 - 562 L
Trunk capacity
555 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,928 - 1,937 mm
Width
2,000 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
387 - 411 kg
Payload
840 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
335 HP
Power HP
571 - 600 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.7 - 7.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 5.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
563 Nm
Torque
850 - 900 Nm
Number of Cylinders
6
Number of Cylinders
12
Power kW
246 kW
Power kW
420 - 441 kW
Engine capacity
2,694 cm3
Engine capacity
6,749 cm3

General

Model Year
2023
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
Ford
Brand
Rolls-Royce
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.