Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Mercedes CLA Shooting Brake comparison
Compare performance (487 HP vs 354 HP), boot space and price (48,400 £ vs 40,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Mustang Mach-E or Mercedes CLA Shooting Brake?
Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Mercedes CLA Shooting Brake: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Mustang Mach-E
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Mercedes CLA Shooting Brake is somewhat cheaper – starting at 40,800 £ , while the Ford Mustang Mach-E costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7,618 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Mercedes CLA Shooting Brake is noticeably more efficient: consuming 12.7 kWh/100km compared to 17.7 kWh/100km for the Ford Mustang Mach-E. That’s a difference of about 5 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Mercedes CLA Shooting Brake offers visibly more range – reaching up to 768 km, about 168 km more than the Ford Mustang Mach-E.
CLA Shooting Brake
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers noticeably more power – delivering 487 HP compared to 354 HP. That’s roughly 133 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is noticeably quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Mercedes CLA Shooting Brake takes 5 s. That’s about 1.2 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Mustang Mach-E delivers clearly more torque with 950 Nm compared to 515 Nm. That’s about 435 Nm more.
Mustang Mach-E
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mercedes CLA Shooting Brake is markedly lighter – 1,710 kg compared to 2,161 kg. The difference is around 451 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers a bit more boot space – 519 L compared to 455 L. That’s a difference of about 64 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mercedes CLA Shooting Brake carries barely more – 460 kg compared to 450 kg. That’s a difference of about 10 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E comes out modestly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £48,400
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Mercedes CLA Shooting Brake
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Mustang Mach-E
The Mustang Mach-E proves an electric SUV can be both playful and practical, with the Mustang name bringing muscle-car charisma to a family-friendly package. It delivers eager performance, a comfortable cabin, and a slick infotainment setup that keeps daily driving fun — and yes, you’ll still get admiring glances at the lights.
details
Mercedes CLA Shooting Brake
The Mercedes CLA Shooting Brake turns estate practicality into runway-ready style with a swooping roofline and coupe-like silhouette that makes even mundane errands feel a little more glamorous. Inside it pairs clever packaging with premium flair, so you get useful load space and a grown-up cabin — ideal if you want a car that looks like a showroom trophy but still handles the weekly shop without sulking.
details
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Mercedes CLA Shooting Brake
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
48,400 - 66,900 £
|
Price
40,800 - 60,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
5 - 5.4 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
12.7 - 13.3 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
470 - 600 km
|
Electric Range
525 - 768 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 - 123 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Estate
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,161 - 2,351 kg
|
Curb weight
1,710 - 2,155 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
519 L
|
Trunk capacity
455 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,881 mm
|
Width
1,855 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
368 - 450 kg
|
Payload
430 - 460 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
268 - 487 HP
|
Power HP
156 - 354 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 6.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5 - 8.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
525 - 950 Nm
|
Torque
280 - 515 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
197 - 358 kW
|
Power kW
115 - 260 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1,499 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, C, D
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.