VS

Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Mercedes GLC EQ comparison

Compare performance (487 HP vs 489 HP), boot space and price (48,400 £ vs 61,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Mustang Mach-E or Mercedes GLC EQ?

Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Mercedes GLC EQ: Key differences

Ford Mustang Mach-E

3.4 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly cheaper
  • moderately quicker 0–100 km/h
  • somewhat lighter
details

Mercedes GLC EQ

4.7 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally more power
  • moderately more efficient
  • somewhat more electric range
  • only slightly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Mustang Mach-E

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Ford Mustang Mach-E is visibly cheaper – starting at 48,400 £ , while the Mercedes GLC EQ costs 61,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 12,670 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Mercedes GLC EQ is moderately more efficient: consuming 14.9 kWh/100km compared to 17.7 kWh/100km for the Ford Mustang Mach-E. That’s a difference of about 2.8 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Mercedes GLC EQ offers somewhat more range – reaching up to 714 km, about 114 km more than the Ford Mustang Mach-E.

GLC EQ

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes GLC EQ offers marginally more power – delivering 489 HP compared to 487 HP. That’s roughly 2 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is moderately quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Mercedes GLC EQ takes 4.3 s. That’s about 0.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Mustang Mach-E delivers a bit more torque with 950 Nm compared to 800 Nm. That’s about 150 Nm more.

Mustang Mach-E

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Mustang Mach-E is somewhat lighter – 2,161 kg compared to 2,535 kg. The difference is around 374 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mercedes GLC EQ offers only slightly more boot space – 570 L compared to 519 L. That’s a difference of about 51 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mercedes GLC EQ carries moderately more – 505 kg compared to 450 kg. That’s a difference of about 55 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Mustang Mach-E holds a slight edge in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £48,400
Mustang Mach-E

Ford Mustang Mach-E

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 268 - 487 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 470 - 600 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Land Rover Range Rover
Mercedes GLC EQ
VS
Comparing the Range Rover with the Mercedes‑GLC (the electrified Mercedes‑EQ version) puts two different luxury philosophies head to head: the Range Rover offers commanding presence, traditional opulence and genuine off‑road ability, while the GLC EQ focuses on compact premium comfort, cutting‑edge …
Ford Capri
Ford Mustang Mach-E
VS
The Ford Capri and the Ford Mustang Mach-E represent two very different takes on driving pleasure—one a classic sporty coupe with nostalgic charm, the other a modern all-electric crossover with high-tech performance. This comparison will help you weigh classic style and driving feel against …
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Mercedes GLC EQ

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Mustang Mach-E

The Mustang Mach-E proves an electric SUV can be both playful and practical, with the Mustang name bringing muscle-car charisma to a family-friendly package. It delivers eager performance, a comfortable cabin, and a slick infotainment setup that keeps daily driving fun — and yes, you’ll still get admiring glances at the lights.

details
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_23-LOW
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_19-LOW
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_24-LOW
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_05-LOW
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_09-LOW

Reviews Ford Mustang Mach-E

3.4 (3 Reviews)
rate
Yvo Trimbos
15 Mar 2026, 19:07:15

Lovely car with sporty handling and fantastic seats.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
M
7 Dec 2025, 19:35:44

Rubbish car.

Features clearly not as polished as other EV SUVs at similar prices (e.g. Volvo EX40 / BYD Sealion 7))

Alarms about driver fatigues every 10 minutes.

Monika
6 Nov 2025, 16:28:23

Well-built car, reasonably priced — unlike the inflated costs of German cars.

Mercedes GLC EQ

The Mercedes GLC EQ brings an electrified touch to Mercedes’ compact luxury SUV line, combining a quiet, refined ride with the comfort and polish you expect from the brand. It’s a smart choice for buyers who want premium materials and everyday practicality while reducing fuel use, though it leans more toward comfort than sporty handling.

details
mercedes-glc-eq-2025
mercedes-glc-eq-2025 (3)
mercedes-glc-eq-2025 (4)
mercedes-glc-eq-2025 (1)
mercedes-glc-eq-2025 (2)
mercedes-glc-eq-2025 (5)
mercedes-glc-eq-2025 (6)
mercedes-glc-eq-2025 (7)
mercedes-glc-eq-2025 (8)

Reviews Mercedes GLC EQ

4.7 (3 Reviews)
rate
Hannu
22 May 2026, 10:40:59

It looks like a Mercedes‑Benz and not a bar of soap. Rear space has improved. Air suspension. Luxurious materials. Great dashboard and display.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
IVAN
13 May 2026, 22:11:19

Aesthetic presence, good electric range and usable cargo hold...

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
IVAN
13 May 2026, 22:02:43

Great range, good looking, and virtually zero maintenance compare to the Range Rover which is the highest mainstream maintenance vehicle presently on the road..

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Mercedes C-Class EQ
Mercedes GLC EQ
VS
Comparing the Mercedes C‑Class EQ and the Mercedes GLC EQ pits a sleek, electrically powered executive saloon against a compact electric SUV — two different takes on premium Mercedes electrification. This brief comparison will focus on their size, practicality, driving feel and tech so you can …
Ford Explorer EV
Ford Mustang Mach-E
VS
The Ford Explorer EV swaps the Mustang Mach‑E’s athletic poise for SUV practicality, three-row space and a taller stance — ideal if you need family duties, towing and sensible range without sacrificing slick tech. But if you crave sharper handling, a sportier silhouette and a more emotional drive, …
CUPRA Tavascan
Ford Mustang Mach-E
VS
The CUPRA Tavascan and the Ford Mustang Mach‑E are two electric SUVs that blend sporty performance with everyday practicality, but they take very different approaches to design, driving feel and technology. This comparison will help you see how the Tavascan’s sharp handling and striking CUPRA …
Audi Q6 e-tron
Mercedes GLC EQ
VS
Unsure whether the Audi Q6 e-tron or the Mercedes GLC EQ is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Jaguar I-Pace
VS
In the electrifying world of electric SUVs, the Ford Mustang Mach-E and Jaguar I-Pace stand out as fierce competitors. The Mustang Mach-E impresses with its sporty handling and spacious interior, offering a versatile solution for those seeking a fusion of performance and practicality. Meanwhile, …
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Volvo EX60
VS
Ford Mustang Mach-E and Volvo EX60 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Ford Mustang Mach-E
VW ID.5
VS
Ford Mustang Mach-E and VW ID.5 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Volvo EX60
Mercedes GLC EQ
VS
Volvo EX60 and Mercedes GLC EQ go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Mercedes GLC EQ

Costs and Consumption
Price
48,400 - 66,900 £
Price
61,100 - 70,600 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 16.6 kWh/100km
Electric Range
470 - 600 km
Electric Range
645 - 714 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,161 - 2,351 kg
Curb weight
2,535 kg
Trunk capacity
519 L
Trunk capacity
570 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,881 mm
Width
1,913 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
368 - 450 kg
Payload
505 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
268 - 487 HP
Power HP
489 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 6.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
525 - 950 Nm
Torque
800 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
197 - 358 kW
Power kW
360 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Ford
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
What drivetrain options does the Ford Mustang Mach-E have?

The Ford Mustang Mach-E is offered with Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.