Compare performance (150 HP vs 122 HP), boot space and price (50,500 £ vs 37,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Bus or Nissan Townstar Compact Van?
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Nissan Townstar Compact Van is visibly cheaper – starting at 37,500 £ , while the Ford Transit Bus costs 50,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 13,036 £.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Transit Bus offers a bit more power – delivering 150 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 28 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Transit Bus delivers clearly more torque with 390 Nm compared to 245 Nm. That’s about 145 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Ford Transit Bus offers more seats – 9 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Nissan Townstar Compact Van is noticeably lighter – 1,908 kg compared to 2,338 kg. The difference is around 430 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Transit Bus carries considerably more – 1,162 kg compared to 642 kg. That’s a difference of about 520 kg.
The Ford Transit Bus sits just ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Transit is the reliable people-mover operators turn to when they need space, stamina and sensible running costs without fuss. It doesn't try to be glamorous, but its practical interior, flexible layouts and honest character make it a smart, stress-free choice for shuttle services and group transport.
detailsThe Nissan Townstar is a smart, no-nonsense compact van that makes city running and tight deliveries feel almost effortless thanks to tidy packaging and clever storage. It keeps things sensible on the wallet and the road, offering a comfortable driving position and useful tech without flashy frills — the kind of workhorse you'll actually enjoy parking at the kerb.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
50,500 - 52,900 £
|
Price
37,500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
9.4 - 9.5 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
20.9 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
263 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
245 - 248 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
70 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Bus
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
9
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
4
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,338 - 2,385 kg
|
Curb weight
1,908 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
0 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
5,531 - 5,981 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
2,059 mm
|
Width
1,860 mm
|
|
Height
2,530 - 2,533 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
1,115 - 1,162 kg
|
Payload
642 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
130 - 150 HP
|
Power HP
122 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
360 - 390 Nm
|
Torque
245 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
96 - 110 kW
|
Power kW
90 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,996 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Nissan
|