Compare performance (150 HP vs 272 HP), boot space and price (50,500 £ vs 42,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Bus or smart #3?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
smart #3 is clearly cheaper – starting at 42,000 £ , while the Ford Transit Bus costs 50,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,509 £.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the smart #3 offers substantially more power – delivering 272 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 122 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Transit Bus delivers barely more torque with 390 Nm compared to 384 Nm. That’s about 6 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Ford Transit Bus offers more seats – 9 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, smart #3 is visibly lighter – 1,810 kg compared to 2,338 kg. The difference is around 528 kg.
Looking at boot space, the smart #3 offers clearly more boot space – 370 L compared to 0 L. That’s a difference of about 370 L.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Transit Bus carries clearly more – 1,162 kg compared to 450 kg. That’s a difference of about 712 kg.
The smart #3 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Transit is the reliable people-mover operators turn to when they need space, stamina and sensible running costs without fuss. It doesn't try to be glamorous, but its practical interior, flexible layouts and honest character make it a smart, stress-free choice for shuttle services and group transport.
detailsThe Smart #3 turns the brand's cheeky city-car attitude into a grown-up compact SUV, pairing sleek styling with a surprisingly roomy, well-made interior. It's a brilliant pick for buyers who want electric ease without dullness — practical enough for daily life, but still lively enough to make parking and grocery runs feel a little fun.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
50,500 - 52,900 £
|
Price
42,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
9.4 - 9.5 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.3 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
455 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
245 - 248 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
70 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Bus
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
9
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
4
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,338 - 2,385 kg
|
Curb weight
1,810 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
0 L
|
Trunk capacity
370 L
|
|
Length
5,531 - 5,981 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
2,059 mm
|
Width
1,844 mm
|
|
Height
2,530 - 2,533 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
1,115 - 1,162 kg
|
Payload
450 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
130 - 150 HP
|
Power HP
272 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
360 - 390 Nm
|
Torque
384 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
96 - 110 kW
|
Power kW
200 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,996 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
smart
|