Compare performance (218 HP vs 194 HP), boot space and price (50,800 £ vs 30,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Custom Bus or Mazda 6 Estate?
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Mazda 6 Estate is clearly cheaper – starting at 30,000 £ , while the Ford Transit Custom Bus costs 50,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 20,796 £.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Transit Custom Bus offers slightly more power – delivering 218 HP compared to 194 HP. That’s roughly 24 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Transit Custom Bus delivers substantially more torque with 630 Nm compared to 258 Nm. That’s about 372 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Ford Transit Custom Bus offers more seats – 9 vs 5.
Looking at boot space, the Mazda 6 Estate offers significantly more boot space – 522 L compared to 0 L. That’s a difference of about 522 L.
The Ford Transit Custom Bus stands out in the key areas in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Transit Custom Bus is a workhorse with a surprisingly comfy streak, offering a roomy, practical cabin that keeps passengers happy on long runs. It steers with more finesse than you’d expect from a people-mover and, whether you’re running a shuttle or converting it for weekend adventures, it’s a dependable, no-nonsense choice that makes life easier for drivers and operators alike.
detailsThe Mazda 6 Estate marries elegant, flowing design with everyday practicality, so you get a grown-up wagon that still looks the part on a weekend escape. It rewards drivers with poised handling and a nicely finished cabin, proving that sensible family cars can be engaging — and a little bit cheeky — too.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
50,800 - 63,000 £
|
Price
30,000 - 43,500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
6.8 - 7.6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
22.3 - 26.4 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
155 - 172 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
62 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Bus
|
Body Type
Estate
|
|
Seats
9
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
-
|
Curb weight
1,475 - 1,598 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
0 L
|
Trunk capacity
522 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,805 mm
|
|
Width
2,032 mm
|
Width
1,840 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,480 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,664 L
|
|
Payload
-
|
Payload
483 - 571 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
136 - 218 HP
|
Power HP
145 - 194 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 10.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
205 - 223 km/h
|
|
Torque
415 - 630 Nm
|
Torque
213 - 258 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
100 - 160 kW
|
Power kW
107 - 143 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,021 - 2,022
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mazda
|