Compare performance (218 HP vs 258 HP), boot space and price (50,800 £ vs 38,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Custom Bus or Mazda 6 Saloon?
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Mazda 6 Saloon is visibly cheaper – starting at 38,500 £ , while the Ford Transit Custom Bus costs 50,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 12,311 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Mazda 6 Saloon is markedly more efficient: consuming 16.5 kWh/100km compared to 22.3 kWh/100km for the Ford Transit Custom Bus. That’s a difference of about 5.8 kWh/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda 6 Saloon offers moderately more power – delivering 258 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 40 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Transit Custom Bus delivers substantially more torque with 630 Nm compared to 320 Nm. That’s about 310 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: Ford Transit Custom Bus offers more seats – 9 vs 5.
The Mazda 6 Saloon is barely ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Transit Custom Bus is a workhorse with a surprisingly comfy streak, offering a roomy, practical cabin that keeps passengers happy on long runs. It steers with more finesse than you’d expect from a people-mover and, whether you’re running a shuttle or converting it for weekend adventures, it’s a dependable, no-nonsense choice that makes life easier for drivers and operators alike.
detailsThe Mazda6 saloon feels like the sensible yet stylish choice for buyers who want a car that drives with poise and looks sharper than its badge suggests. It mixes engaging handling, a refined cabin and everyday practicality without shouting for attention — perfect for those who prefer understated class with a wink.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
50,800 - 63,000 £
|
Price
38,500 - 41,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
22.3 - 26.4 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.5 - 16.6 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
479 - 552 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Bus
|
Body Type
Sedan
|
|
Seats
9
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
-
|
Curb weight
2,027 - 2,028 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
336 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,921 mm
|
|
Width
2,032 mm
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,491 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,074 L
|
|
Payload
-
|
Payload
359 - 360 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
136 - 218 HP
|
Power HP
245 - 258 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 7.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
175 km/h
|
|
Torque
415 - 630 Nm
|
Torque
320 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
100 - 160 kW
|
Power kW
180 - 190 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mazda
|