Compare performance (218 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (50,800 £ vs 21,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Custom Bus or Skoda Scala?
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Skoda Scala is significantly cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the Ford Transit Custom Bus costs 50,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 29,368 £.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Transit Custom Bus offers visibly more power – delivering 218 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 68 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Transit Custom Bus delivers substantially more torque with 630 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 380 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Ford Transit Custom Bus offers more seats – 9 vs 5.
The Ford Transit Custom Bus is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Transit Custom Bus is a workhorse with a surprisingly comfy streak, offering a roomy, practical cabin that keeps passengers happy on long runs. It steers with more finesse than you’d expect from a people-mover and, whether you’re running a shuttle or converting it for weekend adventures, it’s a dependable, no-nonsense choice that makes life easier for drivers and operators alike.
detailsThe Skoda Scala is a tidy, no-nonsense hatch that wraps clever packaging and composed manners into a compact, grown-up package. It’s the sensible choice for buyers who want everyday practicality with a dash of style and personality—no drama, just reliable charm.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
50,800 - 63,000 £
|
Price
21,400 - 31,500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
5 - 5.6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
22.3 - 26.4 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
114 - 126 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Bus
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
9
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
-
|
Curb weight
1,199 - 1,271 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
467 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
2,032 mm
|
Width
1,793 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
-
|
Payload
403 - 431 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manual, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
136 - 218 HP
|
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.2 - 10.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
415 - 630 Nm
|
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
100 - 160 kW
|
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Skoda
|