Compare performance (218 HP vs 680 HP), boot space and price (50,800 £ vs 72,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Custom Bus or Volvo EX90?
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Ford Transit Custom Bus is substantially cheaper – starting at 50,800 £ , while the Volvo EX90 costs 72,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 21,366 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Volvo EX90 is clearly more efficient: consuming 17.8 kWh/100km compared to 22.3 kWh/100km for the Ford Transit Custom Bus. That’s a difference of about 4.5 kWh/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EX90 offers substantially more power – delivering 680 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 462 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo EX90 delivers markedly more torque with 870 Nm compared to 630 Nm. That’s about 240 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: Ford Transit Custom Bus offers more seats – 9 vs 7.
The Volvo EX90 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Transit Custom Bus is a workhorse with a surprisingly comfy streak, offering a roomy, practical cabin that keeps passengers happy on long runs. It steers with more finesse than you’d expect from a people-mover and, whether you’re running a shuttle or converting it for weekend adventures, it’s a dependable, no-nonsense choice that makes life easier for drivers and operators alike.
detailsThe Volvo EX90 feels like a Scandinavian fortress on wheels, combining serene luxury with smart safety features that make everyday driving remarkably calm and confident. It dresses cutting-edge electric technology in understated elegance, so buyers who want peace of mind without shouting about it will find it hard to resist.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
50,800 - 63,000 £
|
Price
72,200 - 91,700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
22.3 - 26.4 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.8 - 19.3 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
570 - 620 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Bus
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
9
|
Seats
6 - 7
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
-
|
Curb weight
2,555 - 2,765 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
2,032 mm
|
Width
1,964 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
-
|
Payload
545 - 605 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
136 - 218 HP
|
Power HP
333 - 680 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.2 - 6.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
415 - 630 Nm
|
Torque
480 - 870 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
100 - 160 kW
|
Power kW
245 - 500 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Volvo
|