Compare performance (218 HP vs 455 HP), boot space and price (50,800 £ vs 62,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Custom Bus or Volvo V90?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Ford Transit Custom Bus is markedly cheaper – starting at 50,800 £ , while the Volvo V90 costs 62,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 11,509 £.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo V90 offers substantially more power – delivering 455 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 237 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo V90 delivers somewhat more torque with 709 Nm compared to 630 Nm. That’s about 79 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Ford Transit Custom Bus offers more seats – 9 vs 5.
The Ford Transit Custom Bus comes out clearly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Transit Custom Bus is a workhorse with a surprisingly comfy streak, offering a roomy, practical cabin that keeps passengers happy on long runs. It steers with more finesse than you’d expect from a people-mover and, whether you’re running a shuttle or converting it for weekend adventures, it’s a dependable, no-nonsense choice that makes life easier for drivers and operators alike.
detailsThe Volvo V90 blends Scandinavian elegance with estate practicality, delivering a composed ride and an interior that's both luxurious and perfectly sensible. Packed with clever storage and top-flight safety kit, it's the choice for buyers who want to look classy while hauling life's chaos — without making a fuss about it.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
50,800 - 63,000 £
|
Price
62,300 - 71,700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
0.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
22.3 - 26.4 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
88 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
14.7 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
18 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
60 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Bus
|
Body Type
Estate
|
|
Seats
9
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
-
|
Curb weight
2,075 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
488 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,945 mm
|
|
Width
2,032 mm
|
Width
1,879 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,472 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,454 L
|
|
Payload
-
|
Payload
515 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
136 - 218 HP
|
Power HP
398 - 455 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.8 - 5.5 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
415 - 630 Nm
|
Torque
659 - 709 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
100 - 160 kW
|
Power kW
293 - 335 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Volvo
|