Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Transit Custom Transporter vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque – Which one offers the better deal?
Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Custom Transporter or Land Rover Range Rover Evoque?
Costs and Efficiency: Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Ford Transit Custom Transporter has a a bit advantage in terms of price – it starts at 36300 £, while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque costs 43300 £. That’s a price difference of around 7024 £.
As for range, the Ford Transit Custom Transporter performs clearly better – achieving up to 327 km, about 267 km more than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.
Engine and Performance: Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Transit Custom Transporter has a slight edge – offering 286 HP compared to 269 HP. That’s roughly 17 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.20 s, while the Ford Transit Custom Transporter takes 13.40 s. That’s about 6.20 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque performs evident better – reaching 213 km/h, while the Ford Transit Custom Transporter tops out at 150 km/h. The difference is around 63 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Land Rover Range Rover Evoque pulls distinct stronger with 540 Nm compared to 415 Nm. That’s about 125 Nm difference.
Space and Everyday Use: Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Ford Transit Custom Transporter offers to a small extent more seating capacity – 6 vs 5.
In curb weight, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is hardly perceptible lighter – 1792 kg compared to 1893 kg. The difference is around 101 kg.
In maximum load capacity, the Ford Transit Custom Transporter performs significantly better – up to 6800 L, which is about 5644 L more than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.
When it comes to payload, Ford Transit Custom Transporter decisively takes the win – 1332 kg compared to 600 kg. That’s a difference of about 732 kg.
Who wins the race?
The Ford Transit Custom Transporter proves to be is largely superior and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Ford Transit Custom Transporter is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £36,300
Ford Transit Custom Transporter
Ford Transit Custom Transporter
The Ford Transit Custom Transporter is a versatile commercial vehicle renowned for its practicality and reliability. It offers a roomy cabin with ample storage options, making it ideal for various professional needs. Its sleek design and efficient performance ensure that it remains a popular choice among businesses and tradespeople alike.
details
@ media.ford.com
@ media.ford.com
@ media.ford.com
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque combines refined luxury with robust off-road capabilities. Its sleek design and high-quality interior materials create an elegant yet comfortable driving experience. Advanced technology features and superior handling make it a versatile choice for both city and countryside adventures.
details
@ media.landrover.com
@ media.landrover.com
@ media.landrover.com
@ media.landrover.com
Ford Transit Custom Transporter
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
36300 - 71100 £
|
Price
43300 - 64800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
3.7 - 7.8 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
22.4 - 24.1 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
315 - 327 km
|
Electric Range
60 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
11.8 - 64 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
11.50 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
85 - 177 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 - 63 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
57 - 67 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
4
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1893 - 2122 kg
|
Curb weight
1792 - 2157 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
472 L
|
|
Length
5050 - 5450 mm
|
Length
4371 mm
|
|
Width
2032 mm
|
Width
1900 mm
|
|
Height
1958 - 1959 mm
|
Height
1649 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
5800 - 6800 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1156 L
|
|
Payload
802 - 1332 kg
|
Payload
503 - 600 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, CVT
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
110 - 286 HP
|
Power HP
160 - 269 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
13.4 - 16.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.2 - 10.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
110 - 150 km/h
|
Max Speed
190 - 213 km/h
|
|
Torque
310 - 415 Nm
|
Torque
260 - 540 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
81 - 210 kW
|
Power kW
118 - 198 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1996 - 2488 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1998 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2023 - 2024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, F, B
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
What drive types are available for the Ford Transit Custom Transporter?
The Ford Transit Custom Transporter is available as Rear-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.