Compare performance (286 HP vs 194 HP), boot space and price (49,700 £ vs 30,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Custom Transporter or Mazda 6 Estate?
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Mazda 6 Estate is substantially cheaper – starting at 30,000 £ , while the Ford Transit Custom Transporter costs 49,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 19,674 £.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Transit Custom Transporter offers noticeably more power – delivering 286 HP compared to 194 HP. That’s roughly 92 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Transit Custom Transporter delivers substantially more torque with 630 Nm compared to 258 Nm. That’s about 372 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Ford Transit Custom Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 5.
The Ford Transit Custom Transporter is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Transit Custom is a clever, no-nonsense workhorse that blends roomy practicality with surprisingly car-like driving manners, so your workday feels less like a chore and more like efficient transport. With a sensible interior, smart storage and tidy handling, it’s the kind of van that makes owners smile while they get on with the job — reliable, unfussy and built to keep moving.
detailsThe Mazda 6 Estate marries elegant, flowing design with everyday practicality, so you get a grown-up wagon that still looks the part on a weekend escape. It rewards drivers with poised handling and a nicely finished cabin, proving that sensible family cars can be engaging — and a little bit cheeky — too.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
49,700 - 77,400 £
|
Price
30,000 - 43,500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
6.8 - 7.6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
155 - 172 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
62 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
Estate
|
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
-
|
Curb weight
1,475 - 1,598 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
522 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,805 mm
|
|
Width
2,032 mm
|
Width
1,840 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,480 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,664 L
|
|
Payload
-
|
Payload
483 - 571 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
136 - 286 HP
|
Power HP
145 - 194 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 10.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
205 - 223 km/h
|
|
Torque
415 - 630 Nm
|
Torque
213 - 258 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
100 - 210 kW
|
Power kW
107 - 143 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,021 - 2,022
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mazda
|