Compare performance (269 HP vs 421 HP), boot space and price (67,300 £ vs 38,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Transporter or Mercedes GLA?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Mercedes GLA is clearly cheaper – starting at 38,800 £ , while the Ford Transit Transporter costs 67,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 28,473 £.
As for electric range, the Ford Transit Transporter offers significantly more range – reaching up to 402 km, about 328 km more than the Mercedes GLA.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes GLA offers visibly more power – delivering 421 HP compared to 269 HP. That’s roughly 152 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes GLA delivers a bit more torque with 500 Nm compared to 430 Nm. That’s about 70 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Ford Transit Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 5.
The Ford Transit Transporter shows a few small advantages in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Transit is the no-nonsense workhorse that turns heavy-duty hauling into a surprisingly civilized experience, with a cabin that favors practicality over pretense. It’s the go-to for tradespeople and fleet managers who want reliability, adaptability and low running headaches — not showy gimmicks.
detailsThe Mercedes GLA is a compact luxury crossover that brings Mercedes-Benz's refined design and premium cabin materials into a practical, city-friendly package. It combines comfortable ride quality and intuitive tech with poised handling, making it a confident choice for everyday driving and longer journeys.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
67,300 - 73,000 £
|
Price
38,800 - 75,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
2.9 - 9.5 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
341 - 402 km
|
Electric Range
74 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
66 - 216 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
-
|
Curb weight
1,570 - 1,810 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
385 - 435 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
2,059 mm
|
Width
1,834 - 1,849 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
-
|
Payload
480 - 500 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel, Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
184 - 269 HP
|
Power HP
116 - 421 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.3 - 11 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
430 Nm
|
Torque
230 - 500 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
135 - 198 kW
|
Power kW
85 - 310 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,991 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, B, G
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|