Compare performance (421 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (38,800 £ vs 26,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes GLA or VW T-Roc?
When comparing the Mercedes GLA and the VW T-Roc, two robust contenders in the compact SUV segment, potential buyers stand at a crossroads of luxury and practicality. Both models shine bright with distinctive features and technologies that cater to modern drivers' desires. In this article, we will delve into the technical specifications, innovative features, and design details that set these vehicles apart.
The 2024 Mercedes GLA offers an impressive lineup of engine options, including petrol MHEV, diesel, plug-in hybrid, and standard petrol variants. With power outputs ranging from 116 HP to a staggering 421 HP in the high-performance AMG model, the GLA caters to various driving preferences. The efficient consumption rates also appeal to budget-conscious consumers, with figures as low as 1.1 L/100km for the plug-in hybrid model.
On the other hand, the 2024 VW T-Roc provides a selection of petrol and diesel engines, with power outputs from 115 HP to 300 HP. The T-Roc's manual and automatic transmission options, coupled with a particularly sporty variant capable of accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h in just 4.9 seconds, make it an engaging vehicle to drive.
Both SUVs showcase striking designs that reflect their brand identities. The GLA measures 4412 mm in length, 1834 mm in width, and stands 1616 mm tall. Its stylish contours and robust stance give it a premium feel, complemented by a spacious 425 L trunk capacity.
The T-Roc, slightly shorter at 4236 mm and wider at 1819 mm, features a more youthful appearance, emphasizing a sporty compact SUV aesthetic. Its practicality is evident with a trunk capacity of 445 L, making it a versatile option for everyday use.
With a range of drive types, including front-wheel and all-wheel drive, the GLA ensures excellent handling and traction in diverse conditions. The cabin is designed for comfort, providing ample space for five passengers and incorporating plush materials throughout.
The T-Roc, offering similar seating capabilities, stands out with its customizable interior options and tech-savvy features. Drivers can enjoy variable driving assistance technologies and an optional digital cockpit that enhances visibility and situational awareness.
Mercedes-Benz has equipped the GLA with advanced tech features such as the MBUX infotainment system, which includes AI-driven voice control for navigation and media. The hands-free driving capacity, especially in the higher-end models, showcases the brand's commitment to innovation and safety.
On the other hand, the T-Roc boasts an impressive array of technology, including a user-friendly infotainment system and smart driver assistance features. Its optional FIS display can be tailored to suit the driver’s preferences, further enhancing the driving experience.
Choosing between the Mercedes GLA and the VW T-Roc ultimately boils down to personal preference. The GLA leans heavily towards luxury, technological advancement, and sporty performance, making it an ideal choice for those prioritizing a top-tier driving experience. However, the T-Roc shines with practicality, customizable tech features, and a sporty demeanor suitable for everyday adventures.
Both vehicles have distinct advantages and cater to a diverse set of needs. Whether consumers prefer the luxury of the GLA or the versatility of the T-Roc, each SUV has something unique to offer in the competitive landscape of modern automobiles.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
VW T-Roc is considerably cheaper – starting at 26,400 £ , while the Mercedes GLA costs 38,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 12,398 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mercedes GLA uses 2.9 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the VW T-Roc with 5.5 L/100km. The difference is about 2.6 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes GLA offers clearly more power – delivering 421 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 271 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes GLA is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 4.3 s, while the VW T-Roc takes 8.9 s. That’s about 4.6 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes GLA delivers clearly more torque with 500 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 250 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, VW T-Roc is barely lighter – 1,465 kg compared to 1,570 kg. The difference is around 105 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Mercedes GLA offers markedly more boot space – 435 L compared to 284 L. That’s a difference of about 151 L.
When it comes to payload, the VW T-Roc carries barely more – 515 kg compared to 500 kg. That’s a difference of about 15 kg.
The Mercedes GLA stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mercedes GLA blends Mercedes style with compact crossover practicality, looking sharper than its size suggests while still feeling purposeful around town. Inside it serves up premium materials and tech-forward ergonomics, and the composed ride makes it an appealing pick for buyers who want luxury wrapped in a city-friendly package with a wink of adventurous spirit.
details
The VW T-Roc mixes cheeky, coupe-like styling with the everyday sense and space of an SUV, so it looks fun without sacrificing family sense. It’s a likeable all-rounder with tidy road manners and plenty of personality, ideal if you want a car that’s practical enough for chores but entertaining enough to enjoy.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
38,800 - 75,300 £
|
Price
26,400 - 38,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.9 - 9.5 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 6.3 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
74 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
12.9 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
66 - 216 g/km
|
co2
126 - 143 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
35 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
4 - 5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,570 - 1,810 kg
|
Curb weight
1,465 - 1,539 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
385 - 435 L
|
Trunk capacity
284 L
|
|
Length
4,412 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,834 - 1,849 mm
|
Width
1,811 - 1,828 mm
|
|
Height
1,616 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,385 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
480 - 500 kg
|
Payload
368 - 515 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Petrol
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
116 - 421 HP
|
Power HP
115 - 150 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.3 - 11 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
210 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
230 - 500 Nm
|
Torque
200 - 250 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
85 - 310 kW
|
Power kW
85 - 110 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,991 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E, F, G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D
|
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Brand
VW
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España