Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Jaguar E-Pace vs Land Rover Range Rover Velar - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (269 HP vs 404 HP), boot space and price (32400 £ vs 61900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Jaguar E-Pace or Land Rover Range Rover Velar?
E-Pace
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Jaguar E-Pace has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 32400 £ , while the Land Rover Range Rover Velar costs 61900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 29485 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Jaguar E-Pace manages with 1.40 L and is therefore decisively more efficient than the Land Rover Range Rover Velar with 4.80 L. The difference is about 3.40 L per 100 km.
As for electric range, the Jaguar E-Pace performs hardly perceptible better – achieving up to 69 km, about 6 km more than the Land Rover Range Rover Velar.
Range Rover Velar
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar has a distinct edge – offering 404 HP compared to 269 HP. That’s roughly 135 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar is evident quicker – completing the sprint in 5.40 s, while the Jaguar E-Pace takes 7.30 s. That’s about 1.90 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar performs somewhat better – reaching 250 km/h, while the Jaguar E-Pace tops out at 211 km/h. The difference is around 39 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Land Rover Range Rover Velar pulls somewhat stronger with 650 Nm compared to 540 Nm. That’s about 110 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
E-Pace
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Jaguar E-Pace is somewhat lighter – 1783 kg compared to 2003 kg. The difference is around 220 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar offers to a small extent more room – 552 L compared to 494 L. That’s a difference of about 58 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar performs somewhat better – up to 1358 L, which is about 188 L more than the Jaguar E-Pace.
When it comes to payload, Land Rover Range Rover Velar slight takes the win – 587 kg compared to 554 kg. That’s a difference of about 33 kg.
Who wins the race?
The Jaguar E-Pace proves to be wins the duel decisively and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Jaguar E-Pace is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £32,400
Jaguar E-Pace
Jaguar E-Pace
Land Rover Range Rover Velar
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Jaguar E-Pace
The Jaguar E-Pace brings compact SUV practicality together with taut, sporty design and unmistakable British charm, helping it stand out in a crowded class. Inside, the cabin feels premium and the driving manners are engaging enough to keep a grin on your face, making it a tempting choice for buyers who want Jaguar style without the bulk.
details
Land Rover Range Rover Velar
The Range Rover Velar marries sleek, pared-back styling with genuine off-road poise, so it looks at home in the city yet won’t flinch at rougher roads. Inside, a luxurious, tech-forward cabin pampers occupants while keeping the driving experience confidently in command — and yes, it somehow makes an SUV feel undeniably chic.
details
Jaguar E-Pace
Land Rover Range Rover Velar
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
32400 - 56100 £
|
Price
61900 - 87400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.4 - 8.2 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.8 - 10.2 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
69 km
|
Electric Range
63 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
11.50 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
15.40 kWh
|
|
co2
33 - 185 g/km
|
co2
110 - 232 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
56 - 67 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
62 - 83 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1783 - 2173 kg
|
Curb weight
2003 - 2280 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
494 L
|
Trunk capacity
503 - 552 L
|
|
Length
4395 mm
|
Length
4797 mm
|
|
Width
1984 mm
|
Width
1933 mm
|
|
Height
1648 mm
|
Height
1657 - 1665 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1170 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1335 - 1358 L
|
|
Payload
497 - 554 kg
|
Payload
460 - 587 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
160 - 269 HP
|
Power HP
204 - 404 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.3 - 10.5 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
190 - 211 km/h
|
Max Speed
209 - 250 km/h
|
|
Torque
260 - 540 Nm
|
Torque
430 - 650 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
|
Power kW
118 - 198 kW
|
Power kW
150 - 297 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1998 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1997 - 2997 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, C
|
|
Brand
Jaguar
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
What drive types are available for the Jaguar E-Pace?
The Jaguar E-Pace is offered with All-Wheel Drive or Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.