Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Jaguar F-Pace vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (575 HP vs 269 HP), boot space and price (56400 £ vs 43300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Jaguar F-Pace or Land Rover Range Rover Evoque?
F-Pace
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has a noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 43300 £ , while the Jaguar F-Pace costs 56400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 13115 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Jaguar F-Pace manages with 1.80 L and is therefore decisively more efficient than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque with 3.70 L. The difference is about 1.90 L per 100 km.
As for electric range, the Jaguar F-Pace performs hardly perceptible better – achieving up to 64 km, about 4 km more than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.
Range Rover Evoque
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Jaguar F-Pace has a decisively edge – offering 575 HP compared to 269 HP. That’s roughly 306 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Jaguar F-Pace is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4 s, while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque takes 7.20 s. That’s about 3.20 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Jaguar F-Pace performs evident better – reaching 286 km/h, while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque tops out at 213 km/h. The difference is around 73 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Jaguar F-Pace pulls evident stronger with 700 Nm compared to 540 Nm. That’s about 160 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
F-Pace
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is slight lighter – 1792 kg compared to 1951 kg. The difference is around 159 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque offers hardly perceptible more room – 472 L compared to 470 L. That’s a difference of about 2 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Jaguar F-Pace performs to a small extent better – up to 1428 L, which is about 272 L more than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.
When it comes to payload, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque minimal takes the win – 600 kg compared to 589 kg. That’s a difference of about 11 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Jaguar F-Pace holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Jaguar F-Pace
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £56,400
Jaguar F-Pace
Jaguar F-Pace
5 (1 Reviews)
Jaguar F-Pace blends the prowling presence of a sports car with the practicality of an SUV, looking elegant while rewarding drivers with lively handling. If you crave something that feels special every time you climb in and prefer style and driving flair over blending into the parking lot, the F-Pace is a classy, slightly cheeky alternative to the usual German suspects.
details
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
1 (1 Reviews)
The Range Rover Evoque turns heads with a compact, sculpted silhouette and an interior that feels more boutique hotel than utility vehicle. It delivers composed, playful handling around town while keeping enough ruggedness for weekend escapes — perfect for buyers who want luxury without the ostentation.
details
Jaguar F-Pace
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
56400 - 100800 £
|
Price
43300 - 64800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.8 - 12 L
|
Consumption L/100km
3.7 - 7.8 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
64 km
|
Electric Range
60 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
15.40 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
11.50 kWh
|
|
co2
41 - 274 g/km
|
co2
85 - 177 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
62 - 83 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
57 - 67 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1951 - 2230 kg
|
Curb weight
1792 - 2157 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
354 - 470 L
|
Trunk capacity
472 L
|
|
Length
4747 - 4762 mm
|
Length
4371 mm
|
|
Width
1936 mm
|
Width
1900 mm
|
|
Height
1664 - 1670 mm
|
Height
1649 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1299 - 1428 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1156 L
|
|
Payload
457 - 589 kg
|
Payload
503 - 600 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Petrol
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
163 - 575 HP
|
Power HP
160 - 269 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4 - 10.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.2 - 10.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
195 - 286 km/h
|
Max Speed
190 - 213 km/h
|
|
Torque
380 - 700 Nm
|
Torque
260 - 540 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 8
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
120 - 423 kW
|
Power kW
118 - 198 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1997 - 5000 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1998 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, F, B
|
|
Brand
Jaguar
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
What drive types are available for the Jaguar F-Pace?
Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.