VS

Jaguar F-Pace vs Mazda CX-60 comparison

Compare performance (575 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (56,400 £ vs 43,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Jaguar F-Pace or Mazda CX-60?

Jaguar F-Pace vs Mazda CX-60: Key differences

Jaguar F-Pace

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • substantially more efficient
  • only slightly more electric range
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Mazda CX-60

4.7 (8 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • marginally lighter
  • slightly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

F-Pace

The Stylish Duel: Jaguar F-Pace vs. Mazda CX-60

In the world of luxury SUVs, few can rival the charm and substance provided by the Jaguar F-Pace and the Mazda CX-60. Both vehicles offer a taste of opulence and practicality but with distinctively different philosophies and engineering underpinnings. Let's delve into what makes each unique and how they stand against each other in style, performance, and innovation.

CX-60

Elegance in Design

The design of the Jaguar F-Pace reflects the brand's historic love for luxury and dynamic aesthetics. Measuring approximately 4,747 mm in length and 1,936 mm in width, the F-Pace cuts a striking silhouette. Its bold lines and sophisticated exterior capture the eyes of even the most discerning automotive enthusiasts.

In comparison, the Mazda CX-60 maintains a refined yet bold appearance with its KODO design philosophy. Slightly shorter in length at 4,745 mm, it offers a sophisticated look with purposeful lines that convey motion even when stationary. The 1,890 mm width provides a more compact form factor, ideal for urban settings without compromising interior space.

F-Pace

Power and Performance

The Jaguar F-Pace is available with an array of engines, including diesel and petrol MHEV (Mild Hybrid Electric Vehicle), plugin hybrids, and pure petrol options. It boasts power outputs ranging from 163 HP to a thrilling 575 HP in its top-tier configurations. The impressive 0-100 km/h acceleration time can reach as low as 4 seconds, making it an SUV with sports-car-like performance.

In contrast, the Mazda CX-60 offers a more balanced powertrain selection. With engines that include a plugin hybrid capable of delivering 327 HP, the CX-60 achieves a respectable 0-100 km/h time of 5.8 seconds. The diesel MHEV options provide excellent fuel economy, with an impressive consumption of 5 L/100km combined with an electric range of 64 km in hybrid mode.

CX-60

Interior and Comfort

Both vehicles offer luxury and comfort for up to five passengers. The Jaguar F-Pace's interior is crafted with premium materials reflecting its luxury roots, ensuring a plush ride enhanced by state-of-the-art infotainment systems. Trunk space, however, is a bit limited with a capacity of 470 to 354 liters, depending on the model configuration.

The Mazda CX-60, known for its spaciousness, provides a cavernous trunk capacity of 570 liters. Its interior remains a serene sanctuary, featuring Mazda's human-centric design philosophy, allowing intuitive control and a seamless driving experience. The balance between practicality and luxury is evident in the layout and material selection throughout the cabin.

F-Pace

Technological Innovations

In innovation, Jaguar and Mazda both shine in 2024. The F-Pace, fitted with an advanced automatic transmission and all-wheel-drive system, trustfully manages its abundant power across various terrains. The utilization of both Mild Hybrid and Plugin Hybrid technologies showcases Jaguar's push towards more sustainable driving solutions.

Mazda’s CX-60, however, brings the rear-wheel-drive dynamics to the table, a nuanced touch for driving purists. The Adoption of the i-Active AWD system ensures grip and stability in a variety of conditions, while the plugin hybrid's minimal CO2 emissions (as low as 31 g/km) affirm its eco-friendly credentials.

CX-60

Conclusion

Choosing between the Jaguar F-Pace and the Mazda CX-60 depends on your priorities. If you seek high-performance sports SUV flair with a breadth of engine choices, the Jaguar F-Pace is an enticing option. However, if you prioritize eco-friendliness, interior space, and the craftsmanship of design, the Mazda CX-60 stands out as an excellent candidate.

Ultimately, both vehicles embody technological advancement and luxury, each offering a distinct taste of what modern SUVs can offer in style, performance, and innovation.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

F-Pace

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mazda CX-60 is clearly cheaper – starting at 43,700 £ , while the Jaguar F-Pace costs 56,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 12,729 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Jaguar F-Pace uses 1.8 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Mazda CX-60 with 3.8 L/100km. The difference is about 2 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Jaguar F-Pace offers only slightly more range – reaching up to 64 km, about 1 km more than the Mazda CX-60.

CX-60

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Jaguar F-Pace offers considerably more power – delivering 575 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 248 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Jaguar F-Pace is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 4 s, while the Mazda CX-60 takes 5.8 s. That’s about 1.8 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Jaguar F-Pace delivers noticeably more torque with 700 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 150 Nm more.

F-Pace

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-60 is marginally lighter – 1,890 kg compared to 1,951 kg. The difference is around 61 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-60 offers slightly more boot space – 570 L compared to 470 L. That’s a difference of about 100 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-60 carries marginally more – 612 kg compared to 589 kg. That’s a difference of about 23 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Jaguar F-Pace is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £56,400
F-Pace

Jaguar F-Pace

  • Engine Type : Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Petrol
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 163 - 575 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.8 - 12 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 64 km
Jaguar F-Pace
Mazda CX-60

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Jaguar F-Pace

Jaguar F-Pace blends the prowling presence of a sports car with the practicality of an SUV, looking elegant while rewarding drivers with lively handling. If you crave something that feels special every time you climb in and prefer style and driving flair over blending into the parking lot, the F-Pace is a classy, slightly cheeky alternative to the usual German suspects.

details

Mazda CX-60

The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.

details
Jaguar F-Pace
Mazda CX-60

Costs and Consumption

Price
56,400 - 100,800 £
Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
Consumption L/100km
1.8 - 12 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
64 km
Electric Range
63 km
Battery Capacity
15.4 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
41 - 274 g/km
co2
85 - 137 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
62 - 83 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,951 - 2,230 kg
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
Trunk capacity
354 - 470 L
Trunk capacity
570 L
Length
4,747 - 4,762 mm
Length
-
Width
1,936 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Height
1,664 - 1,670 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,299 - 1,428 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
457 - 589 kg
Payload
581 - 612 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Petrol
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
163 - 575 HP
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4 - 10.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
195 - 286 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
380 - 700 Nm
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 8
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
120 - 423 kW
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
Engine capacity
1,997 - 5,000 cm3
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3

General

Model Year
2024
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
Brand
Jaguar
Brand
Mazda
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.