VS

Jaguar F-Pace vs Mazda CX-5 comparison

Compare performance (575 HP vs 141 HP), boot space and price (56,400 £ vs 30,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Jaguar F-Pace or Mazda CX-5?

Jaguar F-Pace vs Mazda CX-5: Key differences

Jaguar F-Pace

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • substantially more efficient
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • marginally more trunk space
details

Mazda CX-5

4.7 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • a bit lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

F-Pace

Quick take: Jaguar F-Pace and Mazda CX-5 face off

The Jaguar F-Pace and the Mazda CX-5 arrive with very different priorities, so this is less about who is objectively "better" and more about which trade-offs you’re willing to live with. In short, the Jaguar F-Pace VS Mazda CX-5 comparison pits a premium, driver‑focused SUV against a roomier, value‑oriented family car. The F-Pace leans into sharper handling, a quiet highway presence and a noticeably upmarket cabin, while the CX-5 prioritizes space, easy loading and straightforward day‑to‑day usability. Read on to see which character fits your routine: spirited mile‑eating or pragmatic family duty, and why the technical section that follows will matter differently for each buyer.

CX-5

Character and driving feel

The Jaguar F-Pace feels like a European sporting SUV — direct steering, taut body control and a sense that it wants to be driven with purpose. By contrast, the Mazda CX-5 is tuned toward calm, predictable responses: it rewards smooth inputs and punishes aggressive expectations with a softer, less eager powertrain. That difference makes the F-Pace more engaging on country roads and the CX-5 more forgiving in everyday traffic. If you enjoy cornering and a connected steering feel, the Jaguar will satisfy; if you prefer relaxed, confidence‑oriented manners, the Mazda is the sensible choice.

F-Pace

Comfort and long‑distance behavior

On the motorway the Jaguar F-Pace impresses with low cabin noise and supportive seats that make long hours behind the wheel less tiring, though its suspension can feel firmer when fitted with larger wheels. The Mazda CX-5 trades a touch of that refinement for a cushioned ride and a more relaxed posture in the cabin, which many will prefer for family road trips. However, the CX-5’s engine becomes more audible under load, so overtaking and steep climbs draw attention to its limitations. For regular long‑distance commuting pick the F-Pace for serenity and driver comfort; for comfortable family cruising the CX-5 is an easier, less demanding companion.

CX-5

Practicality and family usability

The Mazda CX-5 makes everyday life easier: wider rear doors, more usable rear legroom and a very flat, low‑loading boot that simplifies strollers and luggage. The Jaguar F-Pace isn’t clueless — it has a sensible split rear seat and a usable load area — but certain variants reduce luggage practicality and complicate loading, which a family will notice. The CX-5’s layout and door architecture make child seats and regular cargo routines faster and less fiddly. If your priority is straightforward family logistics and maximum usable space, the Mazda is the pragmatist’s pick; if you value style and a sportier driving package more than absolute cargo convenience, the F-Pace will still serve adequately.

F-Pace

Cabin feel, tech and perceived quality

The F-Pace benefits from a recent interior uplift: richer materials, stronger attention to detail and an ambience that reads more premium the moment you sit down. Mazda’s CX-5 scores with clean, modern interfaces and deep Google integration that brings smart features and over‑the‑air updates, but some touch‑centric controls and harder plastics keep it a step behind in tactile luxury. Jaguar’s infotainment is feature‑rich and polished but can feel more complex, while Mazda’s system is simpler yet sometimes slow and touch‑dependent. If perceived luxury and material quality matter, the Jaguar edges ahead; if intuitive cloud services and software convenience top your list, the Mazda packs the smarter gadget set for daily life.

CX-5

City friendliness, running costs and buyer fit

In town the Mazda CX-5 is easier to live with: lighter steering, better visibility in manoeuvres and a layout that reduces everyday friction — plus a lower entry cost that makes ownership simpler for budget‑minded buyers. The Jaguar F-Pace works in urban settings too, but its firmer setup, wider stance and higher option bills reward drivers who spend serious time on fast roads or who want a premium presence. Running costs and the real benefit of electrified options depend on how you use them; regular charging and longer motorway stints amplify the Jaguar’s strengths, while conservative ownership and family practicality tilt the scales toward the Mazda. Choose the F-Pace if you want a more emotional, refined driving experience; choose the CX-5 if you need space, simplicity and everyday value — and let the technical comparison that follows clarify the mechanics behind those choices.

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-5
Volvo XC40
VS
The Mazda CX-5 and Volvo XC40 are two leading compact SUVs that blend style, comfort and day-to-day practicality for buyers who want a premium feel without stepping up to a large luxury brand. The CX-5 leans toward engaging driving dynamics and an upscale, tactile cabin, while the XC40 prioritizes …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The trusted Mazda CX-5 takes on the new, electrified Mazda CX-6e in a straight-up duel of everyday usability, driving feel and running costs. We drive them back-to-back to see which one gives you the sharper handling, smarter packaging and better value for your money — and which is just prettier on …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

F-Pace

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mazda CX-5 is considerably cheaper – starting at 30,000 £ , while the Jaguar F-Pace costs 56,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 26,409 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Jaguar F-Pace uses 1.8 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Mazda CX-5 with 7 L/100km. The difference is about 5.2 L/100km.

CX-5

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Jaguar F-Pace offers clearly more power – delivering 575 HP compared to 141 HP. That’s roughly 434 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Jaguar F-Pace is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4 s, while the Mazda CX-5 takes 10.5 s. That’s about 6.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Jaguar F-Pace delivers significantly more torque with 700 Nm compared to 238 Nm. That’s about 462 Nm more.

F-Pace

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-5 is a bit lighter – 1,629 kg compared to 1,951 kg. The difference is around 322 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Jaguar F-Pace offers marginally more boot space – 470 L compared to 466 L. That’s a difference of about 4 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-5 carries marginally more – 601 kg compared to 589 kg. That’s a difference of about 12 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Jaguar F-Pace is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £56,400
F-Pace

Jaguar F-Pace

  • Engine Type Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Petrol
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 163 - 575 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 1.8 - 12 L/100km
  • Electric Range 64 km
details
Jaguar F-Pace
Mazda CX-5

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Jaguar F-Pace

Jaguar F-Pace blends the prowling presence of a sports car with the practicality of an SUV, looking elegant while rewarding drivers with lively handling. If you crave something that feels special every time you climb in and prefer style and driving flair over blending into the parking lot, the F-Pace is a classy, slightly cheeky alternative to the usual German suspects.

details
Jag_F-PACE_PHEV_21MY_Portofino_Blue_Portrait_100321_8839
Jag_F-PACE_PHEV_21MY_Portofino_Blue_Portrait_100321_8069
Jag_F-PACE_PHEV_21MY_Portofino_Blue_Portrait_100321_8105
Jag_F-PACE_PHEV_21MY_Portofino_Blue_Interior_100321_9682
Jag_F-PACE_PHEV_21MY_Portofino_Blue_Loadspace_100321_5938

Reviews Jaguar F-Pace

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
Frank
23 Dec 2025, 16:34:38

Really nice car with good multimedia features and a solid sound system. Great for long trips — not tiring to drive.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Mazda CX-5

The Mazda CX-5 blends sporty handling with a refined, premium interior, making everyday driving feel engaging and comfortable. It pairs stylish design and thoughtful cabin materials with user-friendly tech to deliver a well-rounded compact SUV that suits drivers who want more driver involvement without sacrificing practicality.

details
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_21 (1)
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_28
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_int_1

Reviews Mazda CX-5

4.7 (11 Reviews)
rate
Ghighi
26 Jul 2026, 15:53:31

Mazda is much better designed. Audis are pretty ugly overall, especially the "Q" series.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Marc Adriaans
4 Jun 2026, 13:04:31

I've been driving Mazdas for about ten years now without problems and with a lot of enjoyment. The last 3.5 years in a CX‑5. A really nice, smooth car that can tow quite a bit too, although I wouldn't recommend doing that with the FWD because it lacks grip on the front axle — so if you fit a towbar always choose the AWD. The only downside I can think of, after long consideration, is... nothing 🤔

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Bengt
25 Jan 2026, 14:05:09

I've owned several Volvos, but I drive a Mazda now and would never switch back.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 helps you decide between a practical, well-rounded compact SUV and a more spacious, premium model that offers stronger engines and available plug-in hybrid technology. The CX-5 is ideal for buyers prioritizing value, comfort and lower running costs, while …
Mazda CX-5
Nissan Qashqai
VS
In the crowded SUV market, the Mazda CX-5 and Nissan Qashqai vie for attention with their distinct offering to drivers. The Mazda CX-5 stands out with its refined handling and upscale interior, delivering a premium feel that rivals more expensive models. Meanwhile, the Nissan Qashqai impresses with …
Mazda CX-5
Renault Espace
VS
Mazda CX-5 and Renault Espace go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Mazda CX-5 or the …
Mazda 6 Estate
Mazda CX-5
VS
Mazda 6 Estate and Mazda CX-5 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Mazda 6 Estate or the …
Honda ZR-V
Mazda CX-5
VS
Honda ZR-V and Mazda CX-5 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Honda ZR-V or the Mazda CX-5 …
Jaguar F-Pace
Land Rover Range Rover Sport
VS
Jaguar F-Pace and Land Rover Range Rover Sport go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Jaguar …
CUPRA Formentor
Mazda CX-5
VS
CUPRA Formentor and Mazda CX-5 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the CUPRA Formentor or the …
Jaguar F-Pace
Mercedes E-Class
VS
Jaguar F-Pace and Mercedes E-Class go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Jaguar F-Pace or …
Jaguar F-Pace
Mazda CX-5

Costs and Consumption
Price
56,400 - 100,800 £
Price
30,000 - 39,500 £
Consumption L/100km
1.8 - 12 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
7 - 7.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
64 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
15.4 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
41 - 274 g/km
co2
157 - 169 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
62 - 83 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,951 - 2,230 kg
Curb weight
1,629 - 1,671 kg
Trunk capacity
354 - 470 L
Trunk capacity
466 L
Length
4,747 - 4,762 mm
Length
-
Width
1,936 mm
Width
1,860 mm
Height
1,664 - 1,670 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,299 - 1,428 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
457 - 589 kg
Payload
566 - 601 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
163 - 575 HP
Power HP
141 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4 - 10.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.5 - 10.9 s
Max Speed
195 - 286 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
380 - 700 Nm
Torque
238 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 8
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
120 - 423 kW
Power kW
104 kW
Engine capacity
1,997 - 5,000 cm3
Engine capacity
2,488 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
Brand
Jaguar
Brand
Mazda
What drivetrain options does the Jaguar F-Pace have?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.