VS

Jaguar F-Pace vs Mazda CX-5 – Performance, range & efficiency compared

Two cars, one duel: Jaguar F-Pace meets Mazda CX-5.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

F-Pace @ media.jaguar.com

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mazda CX-5 has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 30000 £, while the Jaguar F-Pace costs 56400 £. That’s a price difference of around 26400 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Jaguar F-Pace manages with 1.80 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Mazda CX-5 with 7 L. The difference is about 5.20 L per 100 km.

CX-5 @ de.mazda-press.com

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Jaguar F-Pace has a clearly edge – offering 575 HP compared to 141 HP. That’s roughly 434 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Jaguar F-Pace is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4 s, while the Mazda CX-5 takes 10.50 s. That’s about 6.50 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Jaguar F-Pace performs distinct better – reaching 286 km/h, while the Mazda CX-5 tops out at 195 km/h. The difference is around 91 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Jaguar F-Pace pulls convincingly stronger with 700 Nm compared to 238 Nm. That’s about 462 Nm difference.

F-Pace @ media.jaguar.com

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Mazda CX-5 is a bit lighter – 1629 kg compared to 1951 kg. The difference is around 322 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-5 offers to a small extent more room – 583 L compared to 470 L. That’s a difference of about 113 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-5 performs evident better – up to 2019 L, which is about 591 L more than the Jaguar F-Pace.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Jaguar F-Pace shows itself to be dominates this comparison and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £56,400
Jag_F-PACE_PHEV_21MY_Portofino_Blue_Portrait_100321_8839

Jaguar F-Pace

  • Engine Type : Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Petrol
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 163 - 575 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.8 - 12 L
  • Electric Range : 64 km
details

Jaguar F-Pace

The Jaguar F-Pace effortlessly combines luxury and performance, offering an exceptional driving experience. Its sleek design is complemented by a refined interior that ensures comfort even on the longest journeys. With advanced technology features, the F-Pace remains at the forefront of innovation, making it a standout choice in the SUV segment.

details
Jag_F-PACE_PHEV_21MY_Portofino_Blue_Portrait_100321_8839 @ media.jaguar.com
Jag_F-PACE_PHEV_21MY_Portofino_Blue_Portrait_100321_8069 @ media.jaguar.com
Jag_F-PACE_PHEV_21MY_Portofino_Blue_Portrait_100321_8105 @ media.jaguar.com
Jag_F-PACE_PHEV_21MY_Portofino_Blue_Interior_100321_9682 @ media.jaguar.com
Jag_F-PACE_PHEV_21MY_Portofino_Blue_Loadspace_100321_5938 @ media.jaguar.com

Mazda CX-5

3 (1)
rate

The Mazda CX-5 exemplifies the perfect blend of style and practicality, offering a sleek design that turns heads while providing ample space for passengers and luggage. Its refined interior boasts high-quality materials and a user-friendly interface, making every journey a comfortable experience. With its engaging driving dynamics, the CX-5 delivers both performance and efficiency, appealing to drivers who crave excitement and reliability.

details
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_21 (1) @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_28 @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_int_1 @ de.mazda-press.com

Similar Comparisons

Mazda CX-5
Skoda Karoq
VS
The Mazda CX-5 courts you with a near-luxury cabin and engaging handling that turns everyday drives into something livelier, while the Skoda Karoq sticks to a sensible script — clever storage, roomy rear seats and sharp value for families. Choose the CX-5 if you want style, poise and a more premium feel; pick the Karoq if practicality, lower running costs and smarter packaging win your heart.
Ford Kuga
Mazda CX-5
VS
In a competitive segment, the Ford Kuga and Mazda CX-5 stand out with distinct personalities, offering drivers a blend of style and functionality. While the Kuga impresses with its spacious interior and advanced tech features, the CX-5 captivates with its dynamic handling and upscale interior quality. Ultimately, choosing between these two compact SUVs comes down to personal preference, as both models deliver a compelling driving experience tailored to diverse lifestyles.
Jaguar F-Pace
Mazda CX-5
F-Pace
CX-5

Costs and Consumption
Price
56400 - 100800 £
Price
30000 £
Consumption L/100km
1.8 - 12 L
Consumption L/100km
7 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
64 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
15.40 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
41 - 274 g/km
co2
157 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
62 - 83 L
Fuel tank capacity
56 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1951 - 2230 kg
Curb weight
1629 kg
Trunk capacity
354 - 470 L
Trunk capacity
583 L
Length
4747 - 4762 mm
Length
4690 mm
Width
1936 mm
Width
1860 mm
Height
1664 - 1670 mm
Height
1695 mm
Max trunk capacity
1299 - 1428 L
Max trunk capacity
2019 L
Payload
457 - 589 kg
Payload
-

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
163 - 575 HP
Power HP
141 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4 - 10.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.50 s
Max Speed
195 - 286 km/h
Max Speed
195 km/h
Torque
380 - 700 Nm
Torque
238 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 8
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
120 - 423 kW
Power kW
104 kW
Engine capacity
1997 - 5000 cm3
Engine capacity
2488 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
Brand
Jaguar
Brand
Mazda

Similar Comparisons

Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 stand out for their refined designs and driver-focused experiences. While the CX-5 offers a well-rounded blend of comfort and practicality, the CX-60 elevates the driving experience with its more powerful engine options and advanced technology features. Ultimately, the choice between these two models will depend on whether buyers prioritize the CX-5's versatility or the CX-60's premium enhancements.
Mazda CX-5
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-5 and VW Tayron offer a fascinating comparison in the compact SUV segment, each catering to distinct driver preferences. The CX-5, renowned for its engaging driving dynamics and upscale interior, promises a spirited yet comfortable ride. Meanwhile, the Tayron, with its robust build and high-tech features, provides a pragmatic approach to everyday driving, emphasizing practicality and modernity.
CUPRA Terramar
Mazda CX-5
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the CUPRA Terramar stands out with its bold design and dynamic performance, appealing to driving enthusiasts who crave a sportier feel. On the other hand, the Mazda CX-5 offers a more refined ride with its upscale interior and focus on comfort, making it a great choice for family-oriented buyers. Ultimately, the decision between the two comes down to whether you prioritize spirited handling or a luxurious cabin experience.
Mazda CX-5
Nissan X-Trail
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the Mazda CX-5 and Nissan X-Trail stand out with their unique blend of style and practicality. The CX-5 offers a more upscale interior and a sportier driving experience, appealing to those who prioritize aesthetics and performance. Meanwhile, the X-Trail excels in spaciousness and versatility, making it an ideal choice for families and outdoor enthusiasts alike.
Mazda CX-5
VW T-Roc
VS
In the ever-competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-5 and VW T-Roc stand out with their unique blends of performance and style. The Mazda CX-5 impresses with its refined interior and sporty handling, making it a driver's delight on winding roads. Meanwhile, the VW T-Roc offers a fun and youthful vibe, combining practicality with a touch of flair and advanced tech features that appeal to the modern, urban lifestyle.
Mazda CX-5
Peugeot 3008
VS
In the competitive crossover segment, the Mazda CX-5 stands out with its sporty performance and premium interior, making it a strong contender against the stylish Peugeot 3008. While the CX-5 offers a dynamic driving experience and impressive handling, the Peugeot 3008 captivates with its sleek design and advanced technology features. Ultimately, the choice between these two models hinges on personal preferences for driving dynamics versus modern aesthetics and innovative infotainment.
BMW X3
Jaguar F-Pace
VS
Mazda CX-30
Mazda CX-5
VS
In the battle of compact SUVs, the Mazda CX-30 and Mazda CX-5 both showcase the brand's signature blend of style and performance. While the CX-30 offers a more agile driving experience with its smaller footprint, the CX-5 impresses with its spacious interior and powerful engine options. Ultimately, choosing between them comes down to personal preference for size and intended usage, as both models deliver an engaging ride and a premium feel.
What drive types are available for the Jaguar F-Pace?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.