VS

Jaguar F-Pace vs Mazda CX-5 comparison

Compare performance (575 HP vs 141 HP), boot space and price (56,400 £ vs 30,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Jaguar F-Pace or Mazda CX-5?

Jaguar F-Pace vs Mazda CX-5: Key differences

Jaguar F-Pace

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • substantially more efficient
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • marginally more trunk space
details

Mazda CX-5

4.7 (8 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • a bit lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

F-Pace

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mazda CX-5 is considerably cheaper – starting at 30,000 £ , while the Jaguar F-Pace costs 56,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 26,409 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Jaguar F-Pace uses 1.8 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Mazda CX-5 with 7 L/100km. The difference is about 5.2 L/100km.

CX-5

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Jaguar F-Pace offers clearly more power – delivering 575 HP compared to 141 HP. That’s roughly 434 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Jaguar F-Pace is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4 s, while the Mazda CX-5 takes 10.5 s. That’s about 6.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Jaguar F-Pace delivers significantly more torque with 700 Nm compared to 238 Nm. That’s about 462 Nm more.

F-Pace

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-5 is a bit lighter – 1,629 kg compared to 1,951 kg. The difference is around 322 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Jaguar F-Pace offers marginally more boot space – 470 L compared to 466 L. That’s a difference of about 4 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-5 carries marginally more – 601 kg compared to 589 kg. That’s a difference of about 12 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Jaguar F-Pace is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £56,400
F-Pace

Jaguar F-Pace

  • Engine Type : Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Petrol
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 163 - 575 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.8 - 12 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 64 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 helps you decide between a practical, well-rounded compact SUV and a more spacious, premium model that offers stronger engines and available plug-in hybrid technology. The CX-5 is ideal for buyers prioritizing value, comfort and lower running costs, while …
Mazda CX-5
VW Tayron
VS
Choosing between the Mazda CX-5 and the Volkswagen Tayron means picking either Mazda’s engaging, driver-focused compact SUV or Volkswagen’s more conservative, comfort- and tech-oriented Tayron. Below I’ll compare design, driving feel, interior quality, practicality and features so you can quickly …
Jaguar F-Pace
Mazda CX-5

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Jaguar F-Pace

Jaguar F-Pace blends the prowling presence of a sports car with the practicality of an SUV, looking elegant while rewarding drivers with lively handling. If you crave something that feels special every time you climb in and prefer style and driving flair over blending into the parking lot, the F-Pace is a classy, slightly cheeky alternative to the usual German suspects.

details
Jag_F-PACE_PHEV_21MY_Portofino_Blue_Portrait_100321_8839
Jag_F-PACE_PHEV_21MY_Portofino_Blue_Portrait_100321_8069
Jag_F-PACE_PHEV_21MY_Portofino_Blue_Portrait_100321_8105
Jag_F-PACE_PHEV_21MY_Portofino_Blue_Interior_100321_9682
Jag_F-PACE_PHEV_21MY_Portofino_Blue_Loadspace_100321_5938

Reviews Jaguar F-Pace

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
Frank
23 Dec 2025, 16:34:38

Really nice car with good multimedia features and a solid sound system. Great for long trips — not tiring to drive.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Mazda CX-5

The Mazda CX-5 blends sporty handling with a refined, premium interior, making everyday driving feel engaging and comfortable. It pairs stylish design and thoughtful cabin materials with user-friendly tech to deliver a well-rounded compact SUV that suits drivers who want more driver involvement without sacrificing practicality.

details
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_21 (1)
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_28
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_int_1

Reviews Mazda CX-5

4.7 (8 Reviews)
rate
Bengt
25 Jan 2026, 14:05:09

I've owned several Volvos, but I drive a Mazda now and would never switch back.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The trusted Mazda CX-5 takes on the new, electrified Mazda CX-6e in a straight-up duel of everyday usability, driving feel and running costs. We drive them back-to-back to see which one gives you the sharper handling, smarter packaging and better value for your money — and which is just prettier on …
Mazda CX-5
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
Choosing between the Mazda CX-5 and the Skoda Kodiaq comes down to whether you value driving finesse and cabin refinement or space and practicality. The CX-5 shines with engaging handling and an upscale interior, while the Kodiaq offers more passenger room, flexible seating and strong …
Ford Kuga
Mazda CX-5
VS
The Ford Kuga is the sensible all‑rounder — roomy, loaded with hybrid options and family-friendly tech — while the Mazda CX‑5 plays the premium card with richer materials and more engaging steering. Choose the Kuga for practicality and efficiency, the CX‑5 if you want style, refinement and a …
Lexus NX
Mazda CX-5
VS
The Lexus NX and Mazda CX-5 are two popular compact SUVs — the NX emphasizes luxury and refinement while the CX-5 focuses on sporty handling and strong value. This short comparison cuts through the marketing to show where each model excels in comfort, technology, fuel economy, and driving feel so …
Jaguar F-Pace
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
VS
In the competitive landscape of luxury SUVs, the Jaguar F-Pace and Land Rover Range Rover Evoque stand out with their distinctive blend of style and performance. The F-Pace impresses with its athletic handling and spacious interior, while the Evoque captivates with its rugged charm and advanced …
Mazda 6 Estate
Mazda CX-5
VS
Unsure whether the Mazda 6 Estate or the Mazda CX-5 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Mazda CX-5
Opel Grandland
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-5 stands out with its sleek design and sporty handling, making it a favorite among driving enthusiasts. In contrast, the Opel Grandland offers a more practical approach, with a spacious interior and advanced tech features aimed at family comfort. …
Audi Q5
Mazda CX-5
VS
Unsure whether the Audi Q5 or the Mazda CX-5 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Jaguar F-Pace
Mazda CX-5

Costs and Consumption
Price
56,400 - 100,800 £
Price
30,000 - 39,500 £
Consumption L/100km
1.8 - 12 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
7 - 7.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
64 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
15.4 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
41 - 274 g/km
co2
157 - 169 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
62 - 83 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,951 - 2,230 kg
Curb weight
1,629 - 1,671 kg
Trunk capacity
354 - 470 L
Trunk capacity
466 L
Length
4,747 - 4,762 mm
Length
-
Width
1,936 mm
Width
1,860 mm
Height
1,664 - 1,670 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,299 - 1,428 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
457 - 589 kg
Payload
566 - 601 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
163 - 575 HP
Power HP
141 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4 - 10.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.5 - 10.9 s
Max Speed
195 - 286 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
380 - 700 Nm
Torque
238 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 8
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
120 - 423 kW
Power kW
104 kW
Engine capacity
1,997 - 5,000 cm3
Engine capacity
2,488 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
Brand
Jaguar
Brand
Mazda
What drivetrain options does the Jaguar F-Pace have?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.