VS

Jeep Compass vs Skoda Superb Combi comparison

Compare performance (225 HP vs 265 HP), boot space and price (34,200 £ vs 36,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Jeep Compass or Skoda Superb Combi?

Jeep Compass vs Skoda Superb Combi: Key differences

Jeep Compass

2.4 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • barely cheaper
  • considerably more electric range
details

Skoda Superb Combi

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • a bit more power
  • significantly more efficient
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
  • only slightly lighter
  • visibly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Compass

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Jeep Compass is barely cheaper – starting at 34,200 £ , while the Skoda Superb Combi costs 36,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,885 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Superb Combi uses 1.2 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Jeep Compass with 3 L/100km. The difference is about 1.8 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Jeep Compass offers considerably more range – reaching up to 500 km, about 363 km more than the Skoda Superb Combi.

Superb Combi

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Superb Combi offers a bit more power – delivering 265 HP compared to 225 HP. That’s roughly 40 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Superb Combi is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 5.7 s, while the Jeep Compass takes 8 s. That’s about 2.3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Superb Combi delivers somewhat more torque with 400 Nm compared to 345 Nm. That’s about 55 Nm more.

Compass

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Superb Combi is only slightly lighter – 1,575 kg compared to 1,667 kg. The difference is around 92 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Superb Combi offers visibly more boot space – 690 L compared to 550 L. That’s a difference of about 140 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Superb Combi carries slightly more – 584 kg compared to 473 kg. That’s a difference of about 111 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Superb Combi is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £36,100
Superb Combi

Skoda Superb Combi

  • Engine Type Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 150 - 265 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 1.2 - 7.8 L/100km
  • Electric Range 128 - 137 km
Jeep Compass
Skoda Superb Combi

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Jeep Compass

The Jeep Compass packs classic Jeep styling with a surprisingly composed demeanor, equally at home turning heads in the city or tackling a weekend dirt track. Inside it's a pragmatic, user-friendly compact SUV that prioritizes comfort and versatility — a smart pick if you want a dose of adventure without giving up everyday sense.

details

Skoda Superb Combi

The Skoda Superb Combi is the practical hero of the estate world, offering cavernous space and a calm, refined ride that makes family life feel effortless. Its clever features, understated design and no-nonsense value make it a smart pick for buyers who want Germanic engineering without the badge premium — and it even manages to stay surprisingly stylish while doing all the heavy lifting.

details
Jeep Compass
Skoda Superb Combi

Costs and Consumption

Price
34,200 - 43,200 £
Price
36,100 - 52,300 £
Consumption L/100km
3 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
1.2 - 7.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
17.5 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
95 - 500 km
Electric Range
128 - 137 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 127 g/km
co2
28 - 178 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Estate
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,667 - 2,198 kg
Curb weight
1,575 - 1,853 kg
Trunk capacity
550 L
Trunk capacity
510 - 690 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,928 mm
Width
1,849 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
472 - 473 kg
Payload
497 - 584 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
145 - 225 HP
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 10 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.7 - 9.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
230 - 345 Nm
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
107 - 165 kW
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,596 cm3
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3

General

Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, D, G, B
Brand
Jeep
Brand
Skoda
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.