VS

Jeep Grand Cherokee vs Land Rover Range Rover comparison

Compare performance (380 HP vs 550 HP), boot space and price (85,600 £ vs 125,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Jeep Grand Cherokee or Land Rover Range Rover?

Jeep Grand Cherokee vs Land Rover Range Rover: Key differences

Jeep Grand Cherokee

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • barely lighter
details

Land Rover Range Rover

3.3 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly more power
  • only slightly more efficient
  • clearly more electric range
  • markedly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • visibly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Grand Cherokee

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Jeep Grand Cherokee is significantly cheaper – starting at 85,600 £ , while the Land Rover Range Rover costs 125,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 39,600 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Land Rover Range Rover uses 2.8 L/100km and is only slightly more efficient than the Jeep Grand Cherokee with 2.9 L/100km. The difference is about 0.1 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Land Rover Range Rover offers clearly more range – reaching up to 116 km, about 71 km more than the Jeep Grand Cherokee.

Range Rover

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover offers markedly more power – delivering 550 HP compared to 380 HP. That’s roughly 170 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Land Rover Range Rover is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.6 s, while the Jeep Grand Cherokee takes 6.3 s. That’s about 1.7 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Land Rover Range Rover delivers noticeably more torque with 800 Nm compared to 637 Nm. That’s about 163 Nm more.

Grand Cherokee

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Land Rover Range Rover offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Jeep Grand Cherokee is barely lighter – 2,434 kg compared to 2,504 kg. The difference is around 70 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Land Rover Range Rover offers visibly more boot space – 818 L compared to 520 L. That’s a difference of about 298 L.

When it comes to payload, the Land Rover Range Rover carries clearly more – 846 kg compared to 641 kg. That’s a difference of about 205 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Land Rover Range Rover is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £125,200
Range Rover

Land Rover Range Rover

  • Engine Type Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 300 - 550 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 2.8 - 11.8 L/100km
  • Electric Range 115 - 116 km
Jeep Grand Cherokee
Land Rover Range Rover

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Jeep Grand Cherokee

The Jeep Grand Cherokee wears its trail-ready roots proudly while wrapping them in a surprisingly civilized and upscale package, so it can tackle rough tracks and the school run with the same swagger. Inside, plush materials and intuitive tech make it a comfortable place to spend time, giving buyers a practical yet characterful SUV that doesn’t take itself too seriously.

details

Land Rover Range Rover

The Range Rover wraps unabashed luxury and genuine off-road capability into a silhouette that still manages to look effortlessly elegant whether parked outside a city hotel or splashing through a muddy trail. Inside, it’s a cocoon of soft leathers, refined materials and serene ride quality that makes long journeys feel like private-jet comfort — ideal for buyers who want a plush cruiser that can also go where lesser SUVs won’t.

details
Jeep Grand Cherokee
Land Rover Range Rover

Costs and Consumption

Price
85,600 £
Price
125,200 - 275,200 £
Consumption L/100km
2.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 11.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
45 km
Electric Range
115 - 116 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
65 g/km
co2
62 - 267 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Off-Roader
Seats
5
Seats
5 - 7
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,434 kg
Curb weight
2,504 - 2,810 kg
Trunk capacity
520 L
Trunk capacity
212 - 818 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,968 mm
Width
2,047 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
641 kg
Payload
645 - 846 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
380 HP
Power HP
300 - 550 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 6.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
637 Nm
Torque
550 - 800 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
6 - 8
Power kW
280 kW
Power kW
221 - 405 kW
Engine capacity
1,995 cm3
Engine capacity
2,997 - 4,395 cm3

General

Model Year
2024
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
Brand
Jeep
Brand
Land Rover
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.