Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has a distinct advantage in terms of price – it starts at 61900 £, while the Jeep Grand Cherokee costs 85600 £. That’s a price difference of around 23743 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Jeep Grand Cherokee manages with 2.90 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Land Rover Range Rover Velar with 4.80 L. The difference is about 1.90 L per 100 km.
As for range, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar performs distinct better – achieving up to 63 km, about 18 km more than the Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar has a minimal edge – offering 404 HP compared to 380 HP. That’s roughly 24 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.40 s, while the Jeep Grand Cherokee takes 6.30 s. That’s about 0.90 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar performs to a small extent better – reaching 250 km/h, while the Jeep Grand Cherokee tops out at 210 km/h. The difference is around 40 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Land Rover Range Rover Velar pulls minimal stronger with 650 Nm compared to 637 Nm. That’s about 13 Nm difference.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Land Rover Range Rover Velar is evident lighter – 2003 kg compared to 2434 kg. The difference is around 431 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar offers hardly perceptible more room – 552 L compared to 520 L. That’s a difference of about 32 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Jeep Grand Cherokee performs distinct better – up to 2004 L, which is about 646 L more than the Land Rover Range Rover Velar.
When it comes to payload, Jeep Grand Cherokee slight takes the win – 641 kg compared to 587 kg. That’s a difference of about 54 kg.
Overall, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar shows itself to be leads convincingly overall and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
The Jeep Grand Cherokee wears its trail-ready roots proudly while wrapping them in a surprisingly civilized and upscale package, so it can tackle rough tracks and the school run with the same swagger. Inside, plush materials and intuitive tech make it a comfortable place to spend time, giving buyers a practical yet characterful SUV that doesn’t take itself too seriously.
detailsThe Range Rover Velar marries sleek, pared-back styling with genuine off-road poise, so it looks at home in the city yet won’t flinch at rougher roads. Inside, a luxurious, tech-forward cabin pampers occupants while keeping the driving experience confidently in command — and yes, it somehow makes an SUV feel undeniably chic.
details|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
85600 £
|
Price
61900 - 87400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.90 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.8 - 10.2 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
45 km
|
Electric Range
63 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
15.40 kWh
|
|
co2
65 g/km
|
co2
110 - 232 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
72 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
62 - 83 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2434 kg
|
Curb weight
2003 - 2280 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
520 L
|
Trunk capacity
503 - 552 L
|
|
Length
4914 mm
|
Length
4797 mm
|
|
Width
1968 mm
|
Width
1933 mm
|
|
Height
1858 mm
|
Height
1657 - 1665 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
2004 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1335 - 1358 L
|
|
Payload
641 kg
|
Payload
460 - 587 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
380 HP
|
Power HP
204 - 404 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.30 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
210 km/h
|
Max Speed
209 - 250 km/h
|
|
Torque
637 Nm
|
Torque
430 - 650 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
|
Power kW
280 kW
|
Power kW
150 - 297 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1995 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1997 - 2997 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, C
|
|
Brand
Jeep
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.