Compare performance (204 HP vs 202 HP), boot space and price (24,800 £ vs 41,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – KGM Torres or KGM Rexton?
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
KGM Torres is significantly cheaper – starting at 24,800 £ , while the KGM Rexton costs 41,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 16,286 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the KGM Torres uses 6.1 L/100km and is noticeably more efficient than the KGM Rexton with 8.2 L/100km. The difference is about 2.1 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the KGM Torres offers marginally more power – delivering 204 HP compared to 202 HP. That’s roughly 2 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the KGM Rexton delivers markedly more torque with 441 Nm compared to 280 Nm. That’s about 161 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: KGM Rexton offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, KGM Torres is visibly lighter – 1,498 kg compared to 2,070 kg. The difference is around 572 kg.
Looking at boot space, the KGM Rexton offers somewhat more boot space – 784 L compared to 703 L. That’s a difference of about 81 L.
When it comes to payload, the KGM Rexton carries visibly more – 845 kg compared to 580 kg. That’s a difference of about 265 kg.
The KGM Torres comes out clearly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Torres presents a modern, practical take on the SUV, with tidy styling and a focus on day-to-day usability. Its cabin is comfortable and thoughtfully arranged, prioritizing convenience and a composed driving experience.
details
The Rexton is a roomy, rugged SUV that prioritizes comfort and practical utility, making it a sensible choice for families and buyers who need genuine off-road capability. It offers solid refinement and a generous equipment level for the money, though the brand still trails more mainstream rivals in recognition.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24,800 - 39,500 £
|
Price
41,100 - 50,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
6.1 - 9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
8.2 - 8.4 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
139 - 205 g/km
|
co2
216 - 219 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Off-Roader
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,498 - 1,670 kg
|
Curb weight
2,070 - 2,105 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
703 L
|
Trunk capacity
236 - 784 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
Width
1,960 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
552 - 580 kg
|
Payload
730 - 845 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
163 - 204 HP
|
Power HP
202 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
280 Nm
|
Torque
441 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
120 - 150 kW
|
Power kW
149 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,497 - 1,498 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2,157 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
|
|
Brand
KGM
|
Brand
KGM
|