Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Land Rover Range Rover Velar vs Jeep Grand Cherokee comparison
Compare performance (404 HP vs 380 HP), boot space and price (62,000 £ vs 85,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Land Rover Range Rover Velar or Jeep Grand Cherokee?
Land Rover Range Rover Velar vs Jeep Grand Cherokee: Key differences
Range Rover Velar
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Land Rover Range Rover Velar is markedly cheaper – starting at 62,000 £ , while the Jeep Grand Cherokee costs 85,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 23,657 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Jeep Grand Cherokee uses 2.9 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Land Rover Range Rover Velar with 4.5 L/100km. The difference is about 1.6 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar offers markedly more range – reaching up to 58 km, about 13 km more than the Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Grand Cherokee
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar offers barely more power – delivering 404 HP compared to 380 HP. That’s roughly 24 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Jeep Grand Cherokee takes 6.3 s. That’s about 0.9 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Land Rover Range Rover Velar delivers very slightly more torque with 650 Nm compared to 637 Nm. That’s about 13 Nm more.
Range Rover Velar
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Land Rover Range Rover Velar is visibly lighter – 2,003 kg compared to 2,434 kg. The difference is around 431 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar offers barely more boot space – 552 L compared to 520 L. That’s a difference of about 32 L.
When it comes to payload, the Jeep Grand Cherokee carries barely more – 641 kg compared to 587 kg. That’s a difference of about 54 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Land Rover Range Rover Velar is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £62,000
Land Rover Range Rover Velar
Land Rover Range Rover Velar
Jeep Grand Cherokee
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Land Rover Range Rover Velar
The Range Rover Velar marries sleek, pared-back styling with genuine off-road poise, so it looks at home in the city yet won’t flinch at rougher roads. Inside, a luxurious, tech-forward cabin pampers occupants while keeping the driving experience confidently in command — and yes, it somehow makes an SUV feel undeniably chic.
details
Jeep Grand Cherokee
The Jeep Grand Cherokee wears its trail-ready roots proudly while wrapping them in a surprisingly civilized and upscale package, so it can tackle rough tracks and the school run with the same swagger. Inside, plush materials and intuitive tech make it a comfortable place to spend time, giving buyers a practical yet characterful SUV that doesn’t take itself too seriously.
details
Land Rover Range Rover Velar
Jeep Grand Cherokee
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
62,000 - 87,400 £
|
Price
85,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 10 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
2.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
58 km
|
Electric Range
45 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
103 - 228 g/km
|
co2
65 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,003 - 2,280 kg
|
Curb weight
2,434 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
503 - 552 L
|
Trunk capacity
520 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,933 mm
|
Width
1,968 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
460 - 587 kg
|
Payload
641 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
204 - 404 HP
|
Power HP
380 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
430 - 650 Nm
|
Torque
637 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
150 - 297 kW
|
Power kW
280 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,997 - 2,997 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,995 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, C, F
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
|
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
Brand
Jeep
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.