VS

Mazda 3 Sedan vs Skoda Scala – Which model is better for everyday use?

Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Mazda 3 Sedan or Skoda Scala fits your lifestyle better.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Skoda Scala has a slightly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 20900 £, while the Mazda 3 Sedan costs 25000 £. That’s a price difference of around 4072 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Scala manages with 5 L and is therefore barely noticeable more efficient than the Mazda 3 Sedan with 5.50 L. The difference is about 0.50 L per 100 km.

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda 3 Sedan has a slightly edge – offering 186 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 36 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda 3 Sedan is minimal quicker – completing the sprint in 8.10 s, while the Skoda Scala takes 8.20 s. That’s about 0.10 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Skoda Scala performs barely noticeable better – reaching 221 km/h, while the Mazda 3 Sedan tops out at 216 km/h. The difference is around 5 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Scala pulls slight stronger with 250 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 10 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Skoda Scala is somewhat lighter – 1199 kg compared to 1420 kg. The difference is around 221 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Skoda Scala offers slight more room – 467 L compared to 450 L. That’s a difference of about 17 L.

When it comes to payload, Mazda 3 Sedan a bit takes the win – 481 kg compared to 431 kg. That’s a difference of about 50 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Mazda 3 Sedan proves to be has the upper hand and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mazda 3 Sedan is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £25,000

Mazda 3 Sedan

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 140 - 186 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.5 - 6.1 L
details

Mazda 3 Sedan

The Mazda 3 Sedan stands out with its elegant and sleek design, capturing attention on the road with its refined aesthetics. Inside, it offers a well-crafted and comfortable cabin, providing a pleasurable driving experience marked by quality materials and advanced features. The car's performance is reliable and smooth, making it a versatile choice for both city driving and long-distance journeys.

details

Skoda Scala

5 (2)
rate

The Skoda Scala is a compact hatchback that seamlessly blends practicality with a touch of elegance. Its spacious interior and advanced infotainment system make it a comfortable and connected driving experience for both drivers and passengers. With its modern design and efficient performance, the Scala stands out as a versatile option in its segment, offering a compelling choice for those seeking value and style.

details
Der neue SKODA SCALA_114931 @ Skoda Presse Deutschland
Der neue SKODA SCALA_114932 @ Skoda Presse Deutschland
Der neue SKODA SCALA_114933 @ Skoda Presse Deutschland
Der neue SKODA SCALA Interieur_114994 @ Skoda Presse Deutschland

Similar Comparisons

Skoda Kamiq
Skoda Scala
VS
In the battle of the Skoda Kamiq versus the Skoda Scala, buyers find themselves torn between functionality and style. The Kamiq, with its elevated stance and compact SUV appeal, offers a commanding driving position, making it an ideal choice for urban adventurers. Meanwhile, the Scala impresses with its sleek hatchback design and spacious interior, catering to those who prioritize a dynamic driving experience and practicality in one refined package.
Skoda Fabia
Skoda Scala
VS
In the dynamic showdown between the Skoda Fabia and Skoda Scala, buyers are treated to two distinct flavors of practicality and style. The Fabia excels as a compact hatchback with a nimble design and generous cargo space, making it ideal for city driving. Meanwhile, the Scala stands out with its more spacious interior and striking aesthetics, appealing to those who prioritize both roominess and modern flair in their daily commute.
Mazda 3 Sedan
Skoda Scala
Scala

Costs and Consumption
Price
25000 - 34200 £
Price
20900 - 30700 £
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 6.1 L
Consumption L/100km
5 - 5.6 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
123 - 135 g/km
co2
114 - 126 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
51 L
Fuel tank capacity
50 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Sedan
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
4
Doors
5
Curb weight
1420 - 1492 kg
Curb weight
1199 - 1271 kg
Trunk capacity
450 L
Trunk capacity
467 L
Length
4660 mm
Length
4362 mm
Width
1795 mm
Width
1793 mm
Height
1440 mm
Height
1514 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1410 L
Payload
467 - 481 kg
Payload
403 - 431 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.2 - 10.8 s
Max Speed
203 - 216 km/h
Max Speed
192 - 221 km/h
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1498 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Skoda

Similar Comparisons

Skoda Scala
Toyota Corolla
VS
Skoda Karoq
Skoda Scala
VS
The Skoda Karoq and Skoda Scala cater to distinct segments of the automotive market, with the Karoq offering a versatile SUV experience and the Scala providing a sporty compact hatchback alternative. While the Karoq boasts more cargo space and a higher driving position, the Scala impresses with its agile handling and fuel efficiency. Ultimately, the choice between these two Skoda models will depend on individual priorities—whether you're seeking practicality or a dynamic driving experience.
Skoda Octavia Combi
Skoda Scala
VS
Audi A3 Sportback
Skoda Scala
VS
The Audi A3 Sportback and the Skoda Scala are both excellent options for those seeking a compact yet versatile ride, each showcasing their respective brand’s strengths. The A3 Sportback offers a more premium experience with refined interiors and advanced technology, but comes with a higher price tag that reflects its luxurious appeal. On the other hand, the Scala strikes a remarkable balance between affordability and practicality, making it an appealing choice for budget-conscious drivers who still value modern features and a spacious interior.
Honda Jazz
Skoda Scala
VS
Hyundai i30
Skoda Scala
VS
Kia Ceed
Skoda Scala
VS
SEAT Arona
Skoda Scala
VS
In the increasingly competitive compact crossover segment, the SEAT Arona stands out with its sporty design and engaging driving dynamics, appealing to younger buyers seeking fun and functionality. Conversely, the Skoda Scala offers a more traditional hatchback experience, prioritizing practicality and spaciousness, making it an excellent choice for families. Both models come equipped with modern technology and safety features, but the decision ultimately hinges on whether one values style or utility more in their everyday drives.
What drivetrain options does the Mazda 3 Sedan have?

The Mazda 3 Sedan is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.