Is the Skoda Scala offered with different drivetrains?

The Skoda Scala is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

How powerful is the Skoda Scala's engine?

Up to 150 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

How much fuel does the Skoda Scala use?

Based on WLTP testing, consumption is around 5 L.

How big is the Skoda Scala overall?

The Skoda Scala measures 4362 mm long, 1793 mm wide and 1514 mm high.

Is the VW T-Roc offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

How powerful is the VW T-Roc's engine?

The VW T-Roc reaches a peak output of 150 HP, depending on the model.

What is the fuel consumption of the VW T-Roc according to the manufacturer?

Fuel consumption according to the manufacturer is 5.50 L.

What is the VW T-Roc’s trunk volume?

Depending on configuration, up to 284 L fit inside.

Skoda Scala vs VW T-Roc comparison - differences, prices & technical data

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Scala

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Skoda Scala has a distinct advantage in terms of price – it starts at 20900 £ , while the VW T-Roc costs 26400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5533 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Scala manages with 5 L and is therefore hardly perceptible more efficient than the VW T-Roc with 5.50 L. The difference is about 0.50 L per 100 km.

T-Roc

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

Both models deliver identical power – 150 HP each.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Scala is hardly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 8.20 s, while the VW T-Roc takes 8.90 s. That’s about 0.70 s faster.

Both models offer the same torque – 250 Nm.

Scala

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Skoda Scala is evident lighter – 1199 kg compared to 1465 kg. The difference is around 266 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Skoda Scala offers clearly perceptible more room – 467 L compared to 284 L. That’s a difference of about 183 L.

When it comes to payload, VW T-Roc somewhat takes the win – 515 kg compared to 431 kg. That’s a difference of about 84 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Scala is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Frequently compared as well

Lexus LBX

VW T-Roc

VS

The Lexus LBX feels like a posh city cocoon — whisper-quiet, well-stitched and leaning into hybrid efficiency and premium touches — while the VW T‑Roc is a cheeky, practical all-rounder that drives with more snap, offers more space and gives better value for the money. Choose the LBX if you want …

Nissan Qashqai

VW T-Roc

VS

The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, family-friendly compact SUV — roomy, quietly comfortable and packed with practical tech for long motorway miles. The VW T-Roc swaps a little rear-seat space for cheeky styling and sharper handling, so if you want personality and a bit more driver engagement it’s …

Reviews Skoda Scala

4.9 (6 Reviews)

Jose Ant.
1 Feb 2026, 04:13:05

The Scala is roomier inside than it looks, and very agile on both the highway and in town — ideal for practical, family use. It also uses less fuel.

Show detailed rating

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car

Efficiency / Consumption & Range

Comfort & Interior

Driving Fun / Performance

Technology & Infotainment

Safety

Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use

Value for Money

Reviews VW T-Roc

4.7 (4 Reviews)

Ester
17 Sept 2025, 14:29:41

I've been driving the VW T‑Roc for a few months now and I'm totally satisfied. 🚗 The higher seating position gives me a great feeling of security and the visibility in city traffic is excellent. I especially like the modern infotainment system — everything works intuitively and quickly. On the motorway it feels very calm and stable, even at higher speeds. Overall a great car that's a lot of fun and still economical.

Costs and Consumption
Price 20900 - 30700 £	Price 26400 - 38600 £
Consumption L/100km 5 - 5.6 L	Consumption L/100km 5.5 - 6.3 L
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range -	Electric Range -
Battery Capacity -	Battery Capacity -
co2 114 - 126 g/km	co2 126 - 143 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 50 L	Fuel tank capacity -

Dimensions and Body
Body Type Hatchback	Body Type SUV
Seats 5	Seats 4 - 5
Doors 5	Doors -
Curb weight 1199 - 1271 kg	Curb weight 1465 - 1539 kg
Trunk capacity 467 L	Trunk capacity 284 L
Length 4362 mm	Length -
Width 1793 mm	Width 1811 - 1828 mm
Height 1514 mm	Height -
Max trunk capacity 1410 L	Max trunk capacity -
Payload 403 - 431 kg	Payload 368 - 515 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Petrol	Engine Type Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Transmission Manuel, Automatic	Transmission Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic	Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP 95 - 150 HP	Power HP 115 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 8.2 - 10.8 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 8.9 - 12.3 s
Max Speed 192 - 221 km/h	Max Speed -
Torque 175 - 250 Nm	Torque 200 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders 3 - 4	Number of Cylinders 3 - 4
Power kW 70 - 110 kW	Power kW 85 - 110 kW
Engine capacity 999 - 1498 cm3	Engine capacity 999 - 1498 cm3