Compare performance (186 HP vs 140 HP), boot space and price (25,000 £ vs 31,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda 3 Sedan or Suzuki Swace?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the competitive landscape of compact cars, two models stand out: the Mazda 3 Sedan and the Suzuki Swace. These vehicles cater to drivers who value a blend of efficiency, practicality, and a touch of sportiness. Let’s dive into the details to see what each car brings to the table.
The 2024 Mazda 3 Sedan is powered by a petrol MHEV engine, offering a versatile choice between a manual or automatic gearbox. With two power variants producing 186 HP and 140 HP, the Mazda 3 delivers spirited acceleration, clocking 0-100 km/h in just 8.1 seconds at its quickest. This sedan reaches a top speed of 216 km/h and is equipped with front-wheel drive, which ensures agile handling around city corners and on winding roads.
On the other hand, the Suzuki Swace opts for a full hybrid system combined with a CVT automatic transmission. This setup generates 140 HP, which is lower compared to the Mazda, achieving a 0-100 km/h time in 9.4 seconds and a top speed of 180 km/h. The Swace’s hybrid efficiency shines with a consumption rate of 4.5 L/100 km, making it a pragmatic choice for eco-conscious drivers.
When considering practicality, the Suzuki Swace takes a front seat. It boasts a larger trunk capacity of 596 liters, making it ideal for families and those needing extra cargo space. In contrast, the Mazda 3 Sedan offers a 450-liter trunk, which, while smaller, is more than sufficient for daily needs and road trips.
Both vehicles accommodate five passengers comfortably, ensuring they provide enough space for everyone to travel in comfort. However, the Mazda, with its sedan form, provides a more streamline silhouette, measuring 4660 mm in length, whereas the Swace offers a slightly longer body at 4655 mm tailored for versatility.
Efficiency is a hallmark of modern car design, and both vehicles reflect this. The Mazda 3 Sedan emits between 123 to 135 g/km of CO2, slotting into a D efficiency class. The Suzuki Swace, with its hybrid technology, edges ahead with CO2 emissions of only 102 g/km, placing it in a superior C efficiency class. This makes the Swace an appealing choice for those focused on reducing their carbon footprint.
Despite their economical designs, both models offer an engaging driving experience. The Mazda 3 Sedan is celebrated for its precise handling and dynamic performance, enhanced by its lighter curb weight starting at 1420 kg. Meanwhile, the Suzuki Swace provides a comfortable and serene drive, leveraging the hybrid system for a smooth transition between electric and fuel power.
Both the Mazda 3 Sedan and the Suzuki Swace present compelling cases in the compact car segment. The Mazda 3 appeals to those who prioritize performance and a linear driving experience, whereas the Suzuki Swace stands out with its hybrid efficiency and spacious practicality. Your choice between these two might ultimately hinge on your personal priorities—whether it’s the drive or the destination.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Mazda 3 Sedan is clearly cheaper – starting at 25,000 £ , while the Suzuki Swace costs 31,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,900 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Suzuki Swace uses 4.5 L/100km and is markedly more efficient than the Mazda 3 Sedan with 5.5 L/100km. The difference is about 1 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda 3 Sedan offers markedly more power – delivering 186 HP compared to 140 HP. That’s roughly 46 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda 3 Sedan is moderately quicker – completing the sprint in 8.1 s, while the Suzuki Swace takes 9.4 s. That’s about 1.3 s quicker.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mazda 3 Sedan is very slightly lighter – 1,420 kg compared to 1,475 kg. The difference is around 55 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Suzuki Swace offers markedly more boot space – 596 L compared to 450 L. That’s a difference of about 146 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mazda 3 Sedan carries markedly more – 481 kg compared to 360 kg. That’s a difference of about 121 kg.
The Mazda 3 Sedan holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mazda 3 Sedan dresses like a compact premium car, with sculpted lines and an interior that punches well above its class. It rewards drivers with eager handling and a composed, comfortable ride that turns routine runs into something a bit more enjoyable — proof that style and substance can share the same key.
details
The Suzuki Swace is a pragmatic estate that swaps showy design for roomy practicality and a quiet, comfortable ride that suits everyday family life. It won't thrill the enthusiast, but its sensible charm, dependable build and clever packaging make it a smart pick for buyers who want fuss-free usability rather than headline-grabbing performance.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
25,000 - 34,200 £
|
Price
31,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 6.1 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.5 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
123 - 135 g/km
|
co2
102 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
43 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Sedan
|
Body Type
Estate
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,420 - 1,492 kg
|
Curb weight
1,475 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
450 L
|
Trunk capacity
596 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,655 mm
|
|
Width
1,795 mm
|
Width
1,790 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,460 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,606 L
|
|
Payload
467 - 481 kg
|
Payload
360 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
|
Power HP
140 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.4 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
|
Torque
-
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
|
Power kW
103 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,798 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Suzuki
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España