Compare performance (258 HP vs 292 HP), boot space and price (38,500 £ vs 45,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda 6 Saloon or Mercedes EQB?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Mazda 6 Saloon is somewhat cheaper – starting at 38,500 £ , while the Mercedes EQB costs 45,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7,384 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Mercedes EQB is very slightly more efficient: consuming 15.2 kWh/100km compared to 16.5 kWh/100km for the Mazda 6 Saloon. That’s a difference of about 1.3 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Mazda 6 Saloon offers only slightly more range – reaching up to 552 km, about 17 km more than the Mercedes EQB.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes EQB offers somewhat more power – delivering 292 HP compared to 258 HP. That’s roughly 34 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes EQB is noticeably quicker – completing the sprint in 6.2 s, while the Mazda 6 Saloon takes 7.6 s. That’s about 1.4 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Mazda 6 Saloon is very slightly faster – reaching 175 km/h, while the Mercedes EQB tops out at 160 km/h. The difference is around 15 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes EQB delivers markedly more torque with 520 Nm compared to 320 Nm. That’s about 200 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mazda 6 Saloon is marginally lighter – 2,027 kg compared to 2,105 kg. The difference is around 78 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Mercedes EQB offers noticeably more boot space – 495 L compared to 336 L. That’s a difference of about 159 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Mercedes EQB offers clearly more capacity – up to 1,710 L, about 636 L more than the Mazda 6 Saloon.
When it comes to payload, the Mercedes EQB carries somewhat more – 435 kg compared to 360 kg. That’s a difference of about 75 kg.
The Mercedes EQB holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mazda6 saloon feels like the sensible yet stylish choice for buyers who want a car that drives with poise and looks sharper than its badge suggests. It mixes engaging handling, a refined cabin and everyday practicality without shouting for attention — perfect for those who prefer understated class with a wink.
details
The Mercedes EQB is an electric compact SUV that dresses Mercedes' premium feel in practical clothing, with flexible seating and a serene, composed ride that turns everyday errands into a small luxury. It won't thrill the enthusiast, but for buyers who want a smart, spacious and well-made EV with tasteful tech and real-world usability, the EQB is a sensible, slightly buttoned-up choice that impresses without shouting.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
38,500 - 41,600 £
|
Price
45,900 - 58,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.5 - 16.6 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.2 - 17.2 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
479 - 552 km
|
Electric Range
468 - 535 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
70.5 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Sedan
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2,027 - 2,028 kg
|
Curb weight
2,105 - 2,170 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
336 L
|
Trunk capacity
495 L
|
|
Length
4,921 mm
|
Length
4,684 mm
|
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
Width
1,834 mm
|
|
Height
1,491 mm
|
Height
1,654 - 1,689 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,074 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1,710 L
|
|
Payload
359 - 360 kg
|
Payload
435 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
245 - 258 HP
|
Power HP
190 - 292 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 7.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.2 - 8.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
175 km/h
|
Max Speed
160 km/h
|
|
Torque
320 Nm
|
Torque
385 - 520 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
180 - 190 kW
|
Power kW
140 - 215 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|