In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-5 stands out with its sleek design and sporty handling, making it a favorite among driving enthusiasts. In contrast, the Opel Grandland offers a more practical approach, with a spacious interior and advanced tech features aimed at family comfort. Ultimately, the choice between these two vehicles will depend on whether drivers prioritize an engaging driving experience or a versatile and family-friendly setup.
As the SUV market continues to boom, two vehicles that stand out due to their distinct engineering and features are the Mazda CX-5 and the Opel Grandland. This comparison will delve into the technical aspects and innovative features of both models, providing insights into performance, efficiency, and overall appeal for prospective buyers.
The Mazda CX-5 offers a variety of engine choices, including petrol and diesel options. The petrol Mild Hybrid Electric Vehicle (MHEV) variants range from 165 to 194 horsepower, boasting a commendable fuel consumption rate of 5.6 to 7.6 liters per 100 km, depending on the variant. On the other hand, the Opel Grandland lays emphasis on versatility with petrol, plug-in hybrid, and electric options. The petrol variants deliver between 136 and 213 horsepower, with an impressive consumption level as low as 0.8 liters per 100 km in hybrid mode.
Acceleration is a key performance metric for many SUV enthusiasts. The Mazda CX-5 demonstrates solid performance, achieving 0-100 km/h in as little as 9.2 seconds. In contrast, the Opel Grandland shines with its hybrid models, recording acceleration figures as impressive as 7.8 seconds. While both vehicles offer spirited driving experiences, the Grandland’s hybrid technology provides a notable edge in responsiveness and speed.
When it comes to handling and driving dynamics, the Mazda CX-5 establishes itself as a well-tuned SUV. Available with both front-wheel and all-wheel drive options, the CX-5 is designed to offer stability and control, particularly in adverse weather conditions. The Opel Grandland, however, is firmly front-wheel drive with advanced technologies that enhance its agility.
In terms of size, the Mazda CX-5 measures 4575 mm in length, 1845 mm in width, and stands 1680 mm tall. It offers a trunk capacity of 522 liters, which can comfortably accommodate most daily needs. The Opel Grandland is slightly larger, at 4650 mm in length, 1934 mm in width, and 1665 mm in height, with a spacious trunk capacity of 550 liters. Both SUVs are designed to comfortably seat five passengers, making them ideal for families and adventures alike.
Both the Mazda CX-5 and Opel Grandland are equipped with numerous technological innovations that enhance driver experience. The CX-5 features an intuitive infotainment system and advanced safety features, including adaptive cruise control and lane-keeping assist. Conversely, the Grandland boasts cutting-edge hybrid technology, allowing drivers to select electric-only driving modes for efficient, eco-friendly travel, especially in urban settings.
Fuel efficiency is a significant consideration for many buyers today. The Mazda CX-5’s fuel consumption ranges between 5.6 and 7.6 liters per 100 km, producing CO2 emissions of 146 to 173 g/km. On the other hand, the Grandland stands out with its environmentally friendly options. For instance, the fully electric variant produces zero emissions, making it a great choice for eco-conscious consumers, whereas its hybrid models range from 19 to 124 g/km of CO2 emissions.
Ultimately, the choice between the Mazda CX-5 and the Opel Grandland depends on individual preferences and needs. For those seeking a sportier drive with excellent handling, the CX-5 could be more appealing. However, if you lean towards advanced hybrid technology and improved fuel efficiency, the Grandland is an outstanding option. Both models represent fantastic entries in the SUV segment, each with its unique strengths and innovations.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 27600 - 44300
£
|
Price
about 31200 - 44500
£
|
Consumption L/100km
5.6 - 7.6
L
|
Consumption L/100km
0.8 - 6.4
L
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.9 - 17.7
kWh
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
87 - 585
km
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
co2
146 - 173
g/km
|
co2
124, 19, 0
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
56 - 58
L
|
Fuel tank capacity
55
L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
Curb weight
1567 - 1800
kg
|
Curb weight
1600 - 2132
kg
|
Trunk capacity
510 - 522
L
|
Trunk capacity
550
L
|
Length
4575
mm
|
Length
4650
mm
|
Width
1845
mm
|
Width
1934
mm
|
Height
1680
mm
|
Height
1665
mm
|
Payload
434 - 508
kg
|
Payload
564 - 580
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Electric
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
150 - 194
HP
|
Power HP
136 - 213
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.2 - 11.1
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.8 - 10.2
s
|
Max Speed
188 - 208
km/h
|
Max Speed
170 - 220
km/h
|
Torque
213 - 445
Nm
|
Torque
230 - 350
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Power kW
110 - 143
kW
|
Power kW
100 - 157
kW
|
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488
cm3
|
Engine capacity
1199 - 1598
cm3
|
Top speed
188 - 208
km/h
|
Top speed
170 - 220
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2021 - 2022
|
Model Year
2024
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, B, A
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Opel
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.