VS

Mazda CX-5 vs Skoda Scala comparison

Compare performance (141 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (30,000 £ vs 21,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-5 or Skoda Scala?

Mazda CX-5 vs Skoda Scala: Key differences

Mazda CX-5

4.7 (11 Reviews)
rate
details

Skoda Scala

4.7 (10 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • only slightly more power
  • visibly more efficient
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • visibly lighter
  • marginally more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-5

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Skoda Scala is clearly cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the Mazda CX-5 costs 30,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,563 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Scala uses 5 L/100km and is visibly more efficient than the Mazda CX-5 with 7 L/100km. The difference is about 2 L/100km.

Scala

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Scala offers only slightly more power – delivering 150 HP compared to 141 HP. That’s roughly 9 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Scala is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.2 s, while the Mazda CX-5 takes 10.5 s. That’s about 2.3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Scala delivers very slightly more torque with 250 Nm compared to 238 Nm. That’s about 12 Nm more.

CX-5

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Scala is visibly lighter – 1,199 kg compared to 1,629 kg. The difference is around 430 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Scala offers marginally more boot space – 467 L compared to 466 L. That’s a difference of about 1 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-5 carries clearly more – 601 kg compared to 431 kg. That’s a difference of about 170 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Scala stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £21,400
Scala

Skoda Scala

  • Engine Type Petrol
  • Transmission Manual, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 95 - 150 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5 - 5.6 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Kamiq
Skoda Scala
VS
The Skoda Kamiq is a city‑friendly crossover that trades a bit of sportiness for higher seating, clever storage tricks and SUV looks — great if you want practical versatility and a confident view of the road. The Skoda Scala, meanwhile, is the sharper, more car‑like hatchback with better driving …
Skoda Fabia
Skoda Scala
VS
Think of the Skoda Fabia as the scrappy city wizard: compact, cheap to run and brilliantly easy to park, while the Skoda Scala feels like an adult hatchback with more space, sharper tech and a calmer, more composed ride. If you want thrift and cheeky agility, go Fabia; if you need room, refinement …
Mazda CX-5
Skoda Scala

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-5

The Mazda CX-5 blends sporty handling with a refined, premium interior, making everyday driving feel engaging and comfortable. It pairs stylish design and thoughtful cabin materials with user-friendly tech to deliver a well-rounded compact SUV that suits drivers who want more driver involvement without sacrificing practicality.

details
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_21 (1)
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_28
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_int_1

Reviews Mazda CX-5

4.7 (11 Reviews)
rate
Ghighi
26 Jul 2026, 15:53:31

Mazda is much better designed. Audis are pretty ugly overall, especially the "Q" series.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Marc Adriaans
4 Jun 2026, 13:04:31

I've been driving Mazdas for about ten years now without problems and with a lot of enjoyment. The last 3.5 years in a CX‑5. A really nice, smooth car that can tow quite a bit too, although I wouldn't recommend doing that with the FWD because it lacks grip on the front axle — so if you fit a towbar always choose the AWD. The only downside I can think of, after long consideration, is... nothing 🤔

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Bengt
25 Jan 2026, 14:05:09

I've owned several Volvos, but I drive a Mazda now and would never switch back.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Skoda Scala

The Skoda Scala is a tidy, no-nonsense hatch that wraps clever packaging and composed manners into a compact, grown-up package. It’s the sensible choice for buyers who want everyday practicality with a dash of style and personality—no drama, just reliable charm.

details
Der neue SKODA SCALA_114931
Der neue SKODA SCALA_114932
Der neue SKODA SCALA_114933
Der neue SKODA SCALA Interieur_114994

Reviews Skoda Scala

4.7 (10 Reviews)
rate
Herr der Ringe
22 Jun 2026, 13:30:53

Sporty with plenty of space, slightly larger than the Golf 7

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Jose Ant.
1 Feb 2026, 04:13:05

The Scala is roomier inside than it looks, and very agile on both the highway and in town — ideal for practical, family use. It also uses less fuel.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Scala
VW Taigo
VS
The Skoda Scala and the VW Taigo are two popular compact choices: the Scala a roomy, value-focused hatchback and the Taigo a style-led small crossover with a higher driving position. This comparison concentrates on space, comfort, driving character, economy and features to help you pick whether you …
Mazda CX-5
Volvo XC40
VS
The Mazda CX-5 and Volvo XC40 are two leading compact SUVs that blend style, comfort and day-to-day practicality for buyers who want a premium feel without stepping up to a large luxury brand. The CX-5 leans toward engaging driving dynamics and an upscale, tactile cabin, while the XC40 prioritizes …
Honda ZR-V
Mazda CX-5
VS
Honda ZR-V and Mazda CX-5 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Mazda CX-5
Skoda Karoq
VS
The Mazda CX-5 courts you with a near-luxury cabin and engaging handling that turns everyday drives into something livelier, while the Skoda Karoq sticks to a sensible script — clever storage, roomy rear seats and sharp value for families. Choose the CX-5 if you want style, poise and a more premium …
Skoda Scala
VW Golf
VS
In one corner the Skoda Scala — clever, spacious and gloriously sensible; in the other the VW Golf — the benchmark hatchback that smooths out imperfections and keeps resale values healthy. Which one deserves your driveway: the Scala’s no-nonsense practicality and lower price, or the Golf’s polish, …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 helps you decide between a practical, well-rounded compact SUV and a more spacious, premium model that offers stronger engines and available plug-in hybrid technology. The CX-5 is ideal for buyers prioritizing value, comfort and lower running costs, while …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The trusted Mazda CX-5 takes on the new, electrified Mazda CX-6e in a straight-up duel of everyday usability, driving feel and running costs. We drive them back-to-back to see which one gives you the sharper handling, smarter packaging and better value for your money — and which is just prettier on …
SEAT Arona
Skoda Scala
VS
In the increasingly competitive compact crossover segment, the SEAT Arona stands out with its sporty design and engaging driving dynamics, appealing to younger buyers seeking fun and functionality. Conversely, the Skoda Scala offers a more traditional hatchback experience, prioritizing practicality …
Mazda CX-5
Skoda Scala

Costs and Consumption
Price
30,000 - 39,500 £
Price
21,400 - 31,500 £
Consumption L/100km
7 - 7.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
157 - 169 g/km
co2
114 - 126 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,629 - 1,671 kg
Curb weight
1,199 - 1,271 kg
Trunk capacity
466 L
Trunk capacity
467 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,860 mm
Width
1,793 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
566 - 601 kg
Payload
403 - 431 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manual, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
141 HP
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.5 - 10.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.2 - 10.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
238 Nm
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
104 kW
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Skoda
Is the Mazda CX-5 offered with different drivetrains?

The Mazda CX-5 is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.