VS

Mazda CX-60 vs Mercedes GLC EQ comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 489 HP), boot space and price (43,700 £ vs 61,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-60 or Mercedes GLC EQ?

Mazda CX-60 vs Mercedes GLC EQ: Key differences

Mazda CX-60

4.5 (9 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • clearly lighter
details

Mercedes GLC EQ

4.7 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably more power
  • considerably more electric range
  • visibly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-60

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mazda CX-60 is clearly cheaper – starting at 43,700 £ , while the Mercedes GLC EQ costs 61,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 17,427 £.

As for electric range, the Mercedes GLC EQ offers considerably more range – reaching up to 714 km, about 651 km more than the Mazda CX-60.

GLC EQ

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes GLC EQ offers noticeably more power – delivering 489 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 162 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes GLC EQ is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.3 s, while the Mazda CX-60 takes 5.8 s. That’s about 1.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes GLC EQ delivers markedly more torque with 800 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 250 Nm more.

CX-60

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-60 is clearly lighter – 1,890 kg compared to 2,535 kg. The difference is around 645 kg.

Boot capacity is identical – both offer 570 L of storage.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-60 carries moderately more – 612 kg compared to 505 kg. That’s a difference of about 107 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mercedes GLC EQ holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £61,100
GLC EQ

Mercedes GLC EQ

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 489 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.9 - 16.6 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 645 - 714 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 helps you decide between a practical, well-rounded compact SUV and a more spacious, premium model that offers stronger engines and available plug-in hybrid technology. The CX-5 is ideal for buyers prioritizing value, comfort and lower running costs, while …
Volvo EX60
Mercedes GLC EQ
VS
Comparing the Volvo EX60 and the Mercedes GLC EQ pairs Volvo’s minimalist, safety-first electric SUV with Mercedes’ luxury-focused, tech-rich take on the midsize EV crossover. I'll highlight the key differences in driving dynamics, range, interior quality and running costs so you can choose the one …
Mazda CX-60
Mercedes GLC EQ

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-60

The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.

details
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_006_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_008_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_europe_still_010_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_germany_rw_int_002_highres

Reviews Mazda CX-60

4.5 (9 Reviews)
rate
andy
31 May 2026, 10:11:44

Not a really functioning vehicle. High fuel consumption and constant electronic problems, the brakes are a joke.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Leo
7 Mar 2026, 11:15:10

👍

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
THEO
7 Mar 2026, 07:02:13

2026 model is the new standard, great car.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
andy
15 Feb 2026, 18:05:07

A car with lots of problems — more trips to the garage than anything else.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Mercedes GLC EQ

The Mercedes GLC EQ brings an electrified touch to Mercedes’ compact luxury SUV line, combining a quiet, refined ride with the comfort and polish you expect from the brand. It’s a smart choice for buyers who want premium materials and everyday practicality while reducing fuel use, though it leans more toward comfort than sporty handling.

details
mercedes-glc-eq-2025
mercedes-glc-eq-2025 (3)
mercedes-glc-eq-2025 (4)
mercedes-glc-eq-2025 (1)
mercedes-glc-eq-2025 (2)
mercedes-glc-eq-2025 (5)
mercedes-glc-eq-2025 (6)
mercedes-glc-eq-2025 (7)
mercedes-glc-eq-2025 (8)

Reviews Mercedes GLC EQ

4.7 (3 Reviews)
rate
Hannu
22 May 2026, 10:40:59

It looks like a Mercedes‑Benz and not a bar of soap. Rear space has improved. Air suspension. Luxurious materials. Great dashboard and display.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
IVAN
13 May 2026, 22:11:19

Aesthetic presence, good electric range and usable cargo hold...

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
IVAN
13 May 2026, 22:02:43

Great range, good looking, and virtually zero maintenance compare to the Range Rover which is the highest mainstream maintenance vehicle presently on the road..

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Hyundai Tucson
Mazda CX-60
VS
Hyundai Tucson and Mazda CX‑60 both aim at buyers wanting a versatile SUV, but they take different paths: the Tucson prioritises practicality, efficiency and value, while the CX‑60 leans toward a more premium, refined driving experience with stronger performance. Choose the Tucson for space, tech …
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-6e puts two of Mazda’s mid-size crossover offerings head-to-head to see which suits your needs best. I’ll focus on styling, interior quality, powertrain choices, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the smarter choice for daily use and long-term …
Mercedes C-Class EQ
Mercedes GLC EQ
VS
Comparing the Mercedes C‑Class EQ and the Mercedes GLC EQ pits a sleek, electrically powered executive saloon against a compact electric SUV — two different takes on premium Mercedes electrification. This brief comparison will focus on their size, practicality, driving feel and tech so you can …
BMW X3
Mazda CX-60
VS
The BMW X3 and Mazda CX-60 occupy the premium mid-size SUV segment but take different routes—the X3 prioritizes dynamic performance and upscale refinement, while the CX-60 leans toward refined comfort, efficiency and strong value. This comparison will help you decide which suits your priorities: …
Ford Kuga
Mazda CX-60
VS
The Ford Kuga and Mazda CX-60 take different approaches to the family SUV: the Kuga focuses on practicality, value and efficient powertrains, while the CX-60 aims for a more premium feel with stronger driving dynamics and a refined cabin. Choose the Kuga for everyday versatility and lower running …
Audi Q6 e-tron
Mercedes GLC EQ
VS
Comparing the Audi Q6 e-tron and the Mercedes GLC EQ pits two premium electric SUVs that blend luxury, technology and everyday practicality. If you're choosing between the Q6 e-tron and the GLC EQ, this comparison will walk through driving dynamics, range, interior comfort and value to help you …
XPeng G9
Mercedes GLC EQ
VS
XPeng G9 and Mercedes GLC EQ go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the XPeng G9 or the Mercedes …
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-80
VS
The Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 are closely related SUVs that target different buyers: the CX-60 is a premium two-row midsize focused on driving dynamics and efficiency, while the CX-80 stretches that formula into a larger three-row package for families who need extra space. Choosing between them …
Mazda CX-60
Mercedes GLC EQ

Costs and Consumption
Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
Price
61,100 - 70,600 £
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 16.6 kWh/100km
Electric Range
63 km
Electric Range
645 - 714 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
85 - 137 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
Curb weight
2,535 kg
Trunk capacity
570 L
Trunk capacity
570 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,913 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
581 - 612 kg
Payload
505 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
Power HP
489 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
Torque
800 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
Power kW
360 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
What drivetrain options does the Mazda CX-60 have?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.