Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-60 or Renault Rafale?
In the competitive SUV segment, the Mazda CX-60 and the Renault Rafale are making significant headlines as 2024 models. Both vehicles promise a blend of performance, comfort, and advanced technology that caters to the modern driver. Let's delve into a detailed comparison of these two exceptional vehicles, highlighting their technical aspects and innovative features.
The Mazda CX-60 offers a range of powertrain options including a 2.5-liter plug-in hybrid and a 3.3-liter diesel MHEV. With power outputs ranging from 200 to 327 HP and torque figures peaking at 550 Nm, the CX-60 caters to various performance needs. Acceleration from 0-100 km/h is impressively quick, clocking in at just 5.8 seconds in its most powerful iteration. The diesel variant is efficient as well, returning combined fuel consumption figures as low as 5 L/100 km.
On the flip side, the Renault Rafale also stands strong with its engine offerings. Available with a 1.2-liter full hybrid and a plug-in hybrid variant, the Rafale delivers up to 300 HP. It features an exceptional electric range, boasting up to 97 km on electric power alone, making it a highly efficient option for urban driving. Its acceleration, particularly in the hybrid version, is competitive at 6.4 seconds for the 0-100 km/h sprint, which is impressive for a family SUV.
In terms of fuel economy, the CX-60 showcases its efficiency with hybrid variants consuming as little as 1.4 L/100 km in electric mode. The Mazda’s CO2 emissions range from 31 to 139 g/km, positioning it in various efficiency classes from B to E.
Contrastingly, the Rafale touts even lower figures with emissions starting from just 14 g/km, particularly appealing for eco-conscious consumers. The full-hybrid version reports a consumption of 0.6 L/100 km, an outstanding achievement for a traditional SUV.
When comparing dimensions, the Mazda CX-60 measures 4745 mm in length, making it one of the more spacious SUVs in its class with a trunk capacity of 570 L. It offers a comfortable seating arrangement for five, accompanied by an upscale interior design synonymous with Mazda's commitment to quality.
Meanwhile, the Renault Rafale, slightly more compact at 4710 mm in length, still manages to offer generous interior space with trunk capacities reaching 627 L, ideal for families or road trips. Both models come equipped with five doors maximizing accessibility for passengers and cargo alike.
Innovation is at the forefront of both vehicles, but they take different approaches. The Mazda CX-60 integrates advanced driver assistance systems and a user-friendly infotainment interface that emphasizes connectivity and safety. With features like adaptive cruise control, lane-keeping assist, and a premium audio system, it aims to fulfill the highest standards of driver safety and comfort.
The Renault Rafale, on the other hand, boasts cutting-edge hybrid technology and smart tech features such as a fully digital cockpit, enhanced connectivity options, and an intuitive navigation system. It focuses heavily on user experience and convenience with its technology-driven approach, catering to tech-savvy families.
The driving dynamics of the Mazda CX-60 are tuned for driver engagement, offering both all-wheel and rear-wheel drive configurations. This versatility ensures maneuverability whether in city traffic or on off-road excursions. With a curb weight ranging from 1890 to 2055 kg, it provides stability and a confident feel on the road.
In contrast, the Renault Rafale's lightweight build, starting at 1728 kg, plays into its agility, allowing for nimble handling. Despite being predominantly front-wheel drive, it provides a comfortable ride with commendable handling characteristics, appealing to urban drivers who prioritize ease of maneuverability.
Ultimately, the choice between the Mazda CX-60 and the Renault Rafale boils down to individual preferences and needs. The CX-60 champions performance and interior quality, whereas the Rafale excels in innovative tech and hybrid efficiency. Both models cater to the family SUV segment effectively, each bringing a unique set of advantages to the table. As the automotive landscape continues to evolve, these contenders are undoubtedly worth considering for any prospective SUV buyer.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Renault Rafale has a a bit advantage in terms of price – it starts at 37500 £, while the Mazda CX-60 costs 41900 £. That’s a price difference of around 4363 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Renault Rafale manages with 0.60 L and is therefore clearly more efficient than the Mazda CX-60 with 1.40 L. The difference is about 0.80 L per 100 km.
As for range, the Renault Rafale performs clearly perceptible better – achieving up to 97 km, about 33 km more than the Mazda CX-60.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 has a barely noticeable edge – offering 327 HP compared to 300 HP. That’s roughly 27 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-60 is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.80 s, while the Renault Rafale takes 6.40 s. That’s about 0.60 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-60 performs slightly better – reaching 219 km/h, while the Renault Rafale tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 39 km/h.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Renault Rafale is barely noticeable lighter – 1734 kg compared to 1890 kg. The difference is around 156 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Renault Rafale offers barely noticeable more room – 627 L compared to 570 L. That’s a difference of about 57 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Renault Rafale performs barely noticeable better – up to 1910 L, which is about 184 L more than the Mazda CX-60.
When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-60 noticeable takes the win – 612 kg compared to 444 kg. That’s a difference of about 168 kg.
The Renault Rafale proves to be wins the duel decisively and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Renault Rafale is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
@ Renault Group Media
The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.
details
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
The Renault Rafale dresses bold coupé-inspired lines around a practical crossover body, turning heads without trying too hard. Inside it serves up a comfortable, well-equipped cabin and engaging driving manners, making it a clever choice for buyers who want a bit of panache with their daily commute.
details
@ Renault Group Media
@ Renault Group Media
@ Renault Group Media
|
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
|
@ Renault Group Media
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
41900 - 56800 £
|
Price
37500 - 49500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.4 - 5.4 L
|
Consumption L/100km
0.6 - 5 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
64 km
|
Electric Range
97 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
31 - 139 g/km
|
co2
14 - 109 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 58 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1890 - 2055 kg
|
Curb weight
1734 - 2025 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
570 L
|
Trunk capacity
539 - 627 L
|
|
Length
4745 mm
|
Length
4710 mm
|
|
Width
1890 mm
|
Width
1886 mm
|
|
Height
1680 - 1688 mm
|
Height
1613 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1726 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1826 - 1910 L
|
|
Payload
581 - 612 kg
|
Payload
415 - 444 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
|
Power HP
200 - 300 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 8.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
200 - 219 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
|
Torque
-
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
|
Power kW
147 - 221 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1199 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, C
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Renault
|
The Mazda CX-60 is offered with All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España