Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Mercedes Citan Transporter vs Skoda Superb Combi comparison
Compare performance (131 HP vs 265 HP), boot space and price (21,700 £ vs 36,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes Citan Transporter or Skoda Superb Combi?
Mercedes Citan Transporter vs Skoda Superb Combi: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Citan Transporter
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Mercedes Citan Transporter is substantially cheaper – starting at 21,700 £ , while the Skoda Superb Combi costs 36,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 14,344 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Superb Combi uses 1.2 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Mercedes Citan Transporter with 5.1 L/100km. The difference is about 3.9 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Mercedes Citan Transporter offers significantly more range – reaching up to 290 km, about 153 km more than the Skoda Superb Combi.
Superb Combi
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Superb Combi offers clearly more power – delivering 265 HP compared to 131 HP. That’s roughly 134 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Superb Combi is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 5.7 s, while the Mercedes Citan Transporter takes 11.7 s. That’s about 6 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Superb Combi delivers clearly more torque with 400 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 130 Nm more.
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mercedes Citan Transporter is slightly lighter – 1,381 kg compared to 1,575 kg. The difference is around 194 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Mercedes Citan Transporter carries clearly more – 787 kg compared to 584 kg. That’s a difference of about 203 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Skoda Superb Combi is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £36,100
Skoda Superb Combi
Mercedes Citan Transporter
Skoda Superb Combi
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Mercedes Citan Transporter
The Mercedes Citan is a practical, city-friendly van that blends Mercedes' premium touches with sensible commercial utility — it's nimble in tight streets, easy to load, and feels more polished than its price suggests. For small-business owners who want something professional-looking without fuss, the Citan is a dependable workhorse that won’t embarrass you at client meetings and is surprisingly pleasant to drive.
details
Skoda Superb Combi
The Skoda Superb Combi is the practical hero of the estate world, offering cavernous space and a calm, refined ride that makes family life feel effortless. Its clever features, understated design and no-nonsense value make it a smart pick for buyers who want Germanic engineering without the badge premium — and it even manages to stay surprisingly stylish while doing all the heavy lifting.
details
Mercedes Citan Transporter
Skoda Superb Combi
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
21,700 - 33,300 £
|
Price
36,100 - 52,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 6.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
1.2 - 7.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
18.7 - 21.1 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
262 - 290 km
|
Electric Range
128 - 137 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
45 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 156 g/km
|
co2
28 - 178 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
54 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
Estate
|
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
4 - 5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,381 - 1,939 kg
|
Curb weight
1,575 - 1,853 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
510 - 690 L
|
|
Length
4,498 - 4,922 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,859 mm
|
Width
1,849 mm
|
|
Height
1,819 - 1,830 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
2,900 - 3,620 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
449 - 787 kg
|
Payload
497 - 584 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Petrol, Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plug-in Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manual, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
95 - 131 HP
|
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.7 - 13.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.7 - 9.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
132 - 183 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
240 - 270 Nm
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
70 - 96 kW
|
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,461 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,021 - 2,024
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, D, G, B
|
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Brand
Skoda
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.