Compare performance (131 HP vs 136 HP), boot space and price (21700 £ vs 21200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes Citan Transporter or Toyota Proace City Compact Van?
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Toyota Proace City Compact Van has a minimal advantage in terms of price – it starts at 21200 £ , while the Mercedes Citan Transporter costs 21700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 561 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mercedes Citan Transporter manages with 5.10 L and is therefore slight more efficient than the Toyota Proace City Compact Van with 5.20 L. The difference is about 0.10 L per 100 km.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Toyota Proace City Compact Van: with 18.50 kWh per 100 km, it’s barely noticeable more efficient than the Mercedes Citan Transporter with 18.70 kWh. That’s a difference of about 0.20 kWh.
As for electric range, the Toyota Proace City Compact Van performs to a small extent better – achieving up to 337 km, about 47 km more than the Mercedes Citan Transporter.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Toyota Proace City Compact Van has a minimal edge – offering 136 HP compared to 131 HP. That’s roughly 5 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Toyota Proace City Compact Van is minimal quicker – completing the sprint in 11.10 s, while the Mercedes Citan Transporter takes 11.70 s. That’s about 0.60 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Toyota Proace City Compact Van performs barely noticeable better – reaching 186 km/h, while the Mercedes Citan Transporter tops out at 183 km/h. The difference is around 3 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Toyota Proace City Compact Van pulls hardly perceptible stronger with 300 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 30 Nm difference.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Toyota Proace City Compact Van is minimal lighter – 1358 kg compared to 1381 kg. The difference is around 23 kg.
In maximum load capacity, the Toyota Proace City Compact Van performs slightly better – up to 4300 L, which is about 680 L more than the Mercedes Citan Transporter.
When it comes to payload, Toyota Proace City Compact Van to a small extent takes the win – 921 kg compared to 787 kg. That’s a difference of about 134 kg.
The Toyota Proace City Compact Van sits well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mercedes Citan is a practical, city-friendly van that blends Mercedes' premium touches with sensible commercial utility — it's nimble in tight streets, easy to load, and feels more polished than its price suggests. For small-business owners who want something professional-looking without fuss, the Citan is a dependable workhorse that won’t embarrass you at client meetings and is surprisingly pleasant to drive.
details
The Toyota Proace City Compact Van is a city-savvy workhorse that packs surprising practicality and smart packaging into a friendly, easy-to-drive package. It’s the kind of van that gets the job done without fuss — reliable, economical and just sensible enough to make fleet managers smile.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
21700 - 33300 £
|
Price
21200 - 37300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 6.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
5.2 - 6.6 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
18.7 - 21.1 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
18.50 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
262 - 290 km
|
Electric Range
337 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
45 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 156 g/km
|
co2
0 - 150 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
54 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 61 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
|
Doors
4 - 5
|
Doors
4 - 5
|
|
Curb weight
1381 - 1939 kg
|
Curb weight
1358 - 1837 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
4498 - 4922 mm
|
Length
4401 - 4751 mm
|
|
Width
1859 mm
|
Width
1848 mm
|
|
Height
1819 - 1830 mm
|
Height
1860 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
2900 - 3620 L
|
Max trunk capacity
3300 - 4300 L
|
|
Payload
449 - 787 kg
|
Payload
560 - 921 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Petrol, Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric, Diesel, Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
95 - 131 HP
|
Power HP
102 - 136 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.7 - 13.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.1 - 13.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
132 - 183 km/h
|
Max Speed
135 - 186 km/h
|
|
Torque
240 - 270 Nm
|
Torque
205 - 300 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
70 - 96 kW
|
Power kW
75 - 100 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1332 - 1461 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1199 - 1499 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2021 - 2024
|
Model Year
2024 - 2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, E
|
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Brand
Toyota
|
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.