Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Mercedes EQE SUV vs Volvo EX90 - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (625 HP vs 680 HP), boot space and price (71600 £ vs 73700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes EQE SUV or Volvo EX90?
EQE SUV
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Mercedes EQE SUV has a slight advantage in terms of price – it starts at 71600 £ , while the Volvo EX90 costs 73700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2152 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Volvo EX90: with 17.80 kWh per 100 km, it’s hardly perceptible more efficient than the Mercedes EQE SUV with 18.30 kWh. That’s a difference of about 0.50 kWh.
As for electric range, the Volvo EX90 performs minimal better – achieving up to 620 km, about 9 km more than the Mercedes EQE SUV.
EX90
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EX90 has a slight edge – offering 680 HP compared to 625 HP. That’s roughly 55 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes EQE SUV is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.70 s, while the Volvo EX90 takes 4.20 s. That’s about 0.50 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Mercedes EQE SUV performs clearly perceptible better – reaching 240 km/h, while the Volvo EX90 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 60 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Mercedes EQE SUV pulls barely noticeable stronger with 950 Nm compared to 870 Nm. That’s about 80 Nm difference.
EQE SUV
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: Volvo EX90 offers distinct more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.
In curb weight, Mercedes EQE SUV is barely noticeable lighter – 2440 kg compared to 2556 kg. The difference is around 116 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Mercedes EQE SUV offers noticeable more room – 520 L compared to 324 L. That’s a difference of about 196 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Volvo EX90 performs evident better – up to 2135 L, which is about 460 L more than the Mercedes EQE SUV.
When it comes to payload, Volvo EX90 barely noticeable takes the win – 585 kg compared to 580 kg. That’s a difference of about 5 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Mercedes EQE SUV is narrowly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Mercedes EQE SUV
Volvo EX90
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £71,600
Mercedes EQE SUV
Mercedes EQE SUV
5 (1 Reviews)
The Mercedes EQE SUV wraps silent electric power in a sumptuous, tech-filled shell, offering a cocoon-like cabin that makes long journeys feel indulgent. It’s not a driver's toy but a sophisticated cruiser for buyers who want luxury, space and futuristic gadgetry without shouting for attention.
details
Volvo EX90
The Volvo EX90 feels like a Scandinavian fortress on wheels, combining serene luxury with smart safety features that make everyday driving remarkably calm and confident. It dresses cutting-edge electric technology in understated elegance, so buyers who want peace of mind without shouting about it will find it hard to resist.
details
Mercedes EQE SUV
Volvo EX90
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
71600 - 125100 £
|
Price
73700 - 94100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
18.3 - 23.1 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.8 - 19.3 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
453 - 611 km
|
Electric Range
570 - 620 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
90.5 - 96 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
88 - 102 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
6 - 7
|
|
Doors
4
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2440 - 2615 kg
|
Curb weight
2556 - 2764 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
520 L
|
Trunk capacity
324 L
|
|
Length
4863 - 4879 mm
|
Length
5037 mm
|
|
Width
1940 mm
|
Width
1964 mm
|
|
Height
1672 - 1685 mm
|
Height
1744 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1675 L
|
Max trunk capacity
2082 - 2135 L
|
|
Payload
505 - 580 kg
|
Payload
375 - 585 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
265 - 625 HP
|
Power HP
333 - 680 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.7 - 7.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.2 - 6.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
210 - 240 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
550 - 950 Nm
|
Torque
480 - 870 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
195 - 460 kW
|
Power kW
245 - 500 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2023 - 2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Brand
Volvo
|
What drive types are available for the Mercedes EQE SUV?
Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.