Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Mercedes EQS SUV vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (658 HP vs 635 HP), boot space and price (95000 £ vs 78600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes EQS SUV or Land Rover Range Rover Sport?
EQS SUV
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has a noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 78600 £ , while the Mercedes EQS SUV costs 95000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 16372 £.
As for electric range, the Mercedes EQS SUV performs significantly better – achieving up to 695 km, about 577 km more than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport.
Range Rover Sport
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes EQS SUV has a hardly perceptible edge – offering 658 HP compared to 635 HP. That’s roughly 23 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.80 s, while the Mercedes EQS SUV takes 4.40 s. That’s about 0.60 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport performs distinct better – reaching 290 km/h, while the Mercedes EQS SUV tops out at 210 km/h. The difference is around 80 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Mercedes EQS SUV pulls somewhat stronger with 950 Nm compared to 800 Nm. That’s about 150 Nm difference.
EQS SUV
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Land Rover Range Rover Sport is somewhat lighter – 2390 kg compared to 2695 kg. The difference is around 305 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport offers barely noticeable more room – 647 L compared to 645 L. That’s a difference of about 2 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Mercedes EQS SUV performs noticeable better – up to 2100 L, which is about 609 L more than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport.
When it comes to payload, Land Rover Range Rover Sport distinct takes the win – 830 kg compared to 570 kg. That’s a difference of about 260 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Mercedes EQS SUV is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Mercedes EQS SUV
Land Rover Range Rover Sport
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £95,000
Mercedes EQS SUV
Mercedes EQS SUV
The Mercedes EQS SUV blends limousine-level quiet and luxury with the commanding presence of an SUV, wrapping passengers in sumptuous materials and a futuristic, screen-dominated cabin. It drives with serene confidence and delivers the kind of effortless refinement that makes city commutes and long trips feel like first-class experiences — just be prepared for attention wherever you park it.
details
Land Rover Range Rover Sport
The Range Rover Sport pairs unapologetic presence with genuine capability, looking like it belongs on a red carpet while quietly promising to tackle rough tracks when called upon. Inside, the cabin pampers with plush materials and thoughtful tech, making it an irresistible choice for buyers who want luxury, confidence and a touch of adventure.
details
Mercedes EQS SUV
Land Rover Range Rover Sport
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
95000 - 212100 £
|
Price
78600 - 175700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
2.7 - 11.7 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.6 - 21.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
615 - 695 km
|
Electric Range
116 - 118 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
108.4 - 118 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
61 - 266 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
90 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
4 - 5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2695 - 3075 kg
|
Curb weight
2390 - 2810 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
440 - 645 L
|
Trunk capacity
647 L
|
|
Length
5125 mm
|
Length
4970 mm
|
|
Width
1959 - 2034 mm
|
Width
2043 mm
|
|
Height
1718 - 1721 mm
|
Height
1814 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
2100 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1491 L
|
|
Payload
425 - 570 kg
|
Payload
640 - 830 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
360 - 658 HP
|
Power HP
249 - 635 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.4 - 6.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 7.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
210 km/h
|
Max Speed
290 km/h
|
|
Torque
568 - 950 Nm
|
Torque
570 - 800 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
6 - 8
|
|
Power kW
265 - 484 kW
|
Power kW
183 - 467 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
2997 - 4395 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, G
|
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
Is the Mercedes EQS SUV offered with different drivetrains?
The Mercedes EQS SUV is available as All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.