Compare performance (658 HP vs 258 HP), boot space and price (95,000 £ vs 38,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes EQS SUV or Mazda 6 Saloon?
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Mazda 6 Saloon is substantially cheaper – starting at 38,500 £ , while the Mercedes EQS SUV costs 95,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 56,487 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Mazda 6 Saloon is a bit more efficient: consuming 16.5 kWh/100km compared to 19.6 kWh/100km for the Mercedes EQS SUV. That’s a difference of about 3.1 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Mercedes EQS SUV offers visibly more range – reaching up to 695 km, about 143 km more than the Mazda 6 Saloon.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes EQS SUV offers significantly more power – delivering 658 HP compared to 258 HP. That’s roughly 400 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes EQS SUV is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.4 s, while the Mazda 6 Saloon takes 7.6 s. That’s about 3.2 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Mercedes EQS SUV is a bit faster – reaching 210 km/h, while the Mazda 6 Saloon tops out at 175 km/h. The difference is around 35 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes EQS SUV delivers clearly more torque with 950 Nm compared to 320 Nm. That’s about 630 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mazda 6 Saloon is visibly lighter – 2,027 kg compared to 2,695 kg. The difference is around 668 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Mercedes EQS SUV offers clearly more boot space – 645 L compared to 336 L. That’s a difference of about 309 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Mercedes EQS SUV offers considerably more capacity – up to 2,100 L, about 1,026 L more than the Mazda 6 Saloon.
When it comes to payload, the Mercedes EQS SUV carries clearly more – 570 kg compared to 360 kg. That’s a difference of about 210 kg.
The Mercedes EQS SUV is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mercedes EQS SUV blends limousine-level quiet and luxury with the commanding presence of an SUV, wrapping passengers in sumptuous materials and a futuristic, screen-dominated cabin. It drives with serene confidence and delivers the kind of effortless refinement that makes city commutes and long trips feel like first-class experiences — just be prepared for attention wherever you park it.
detailsThe Mazda6 saloon feels like the sensible yet stylish choice for buyers who want a car that drives with poise and looks sharper than its badge suggests. It mixes engaging handling, a refined cabin and everyday practicality without shouting for attention — perfect for those who prefer understated class with a wink.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
95,000 - 212,100 £
|
Price
38,500 - 41,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.6 - 21.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.5 - 16.6 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
615 - 695 km
|
Electric Range
479 - 552 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
108.4 - 118 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Sedan
|
|
Seats
4 - 5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2,695 - 3,075 kg
|
Curb weight
2,027 - 2,028 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
440 - 645 L
|
Trunk capacity
336 L
|
|
Length
5,125 mm
|
Length
4,921 mm
|
|
Width
1,959 - 2,034 mm
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
|
Height
1,718 - 1,721 mm
|
Height
1,491 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
2,100 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1,074 L
|
|
Payload
425 - 570 kg
|
Payload
359 - 360 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
360 - 658 HP
|
Power HP
245 - 258 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.4 - 6.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 7.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
210 km/h
|
Max Speed
175 km/h
|
|
Torque
568 - 950 Nm
|
Torque
320 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
265 - 484 kW
|
Power kW
180 - 190 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Brand
Mazda
|