Compare performance (658 HP vs 680 HP), boot space and price (95000 £ vs 73700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes EQS SUV or Volvo EX90?
The electric vehicle market is rapidly expanding, with automakers pushing the boundaries of innovation. Two such titans, the Mercedes EQS SUV and the Volvo EX90, represent the pinnacle of luxury electric SUVs. How do they stack up against each other? Let's delve into the technical aspects and innovations that set these vehicles apart.
The Mercedes EQS SUV offers a versatile range of powertrains, catering to varied driving preferences. It comes with power outputs ranging from 360 HP to a staggering 658 HP, powered by electric motors that can propel this luxury SUV from 0 to 100 km/h in as little as 4.4 seconds. The maximum speed for this vehicle is capped at 210 km/h. The torque variants stand out, delivering between 568 Nm and 950 Nm, ensuring a smooth and potent performance.
On the other side, the Volvo EX90 provides a more streamlined range of options, offering power ratings of 279 HP, 408 HP, and 517 HP. Acceleration is impressive too, with the EX90 reaching 100 km/h from a standstill in just 4.9 seconds. Its maximum velocity is slightly lower, limited to 180 km/h, with torque offerings of 490 Nm to a robust 910 Nm.
The EQS SUV boasts an exceptional electric range, whispering up to 709 km on a single charge, while being remarkably efficient with consumption figures ranging between 19.1 kWh/100km and 22.5 kWh/100km. Its high capacity batteries are rated at 118 kWh and 108.4 kWh.
The Volvo EX90 also impresses with its range, capable of traveling up to 614 km. With an energy consumption between 19.9 kWh/100km and 20.8 kWh/100km, it strikes a commendable balance between efficiency and power, supported by battery capacities of 101 kWh and 107 kWh.
Both models epitomize luxury and comfort, yet they differ slightly in interior offerings. The EQS SUV can comfortably accommodate up to five passengers with a relatively high trunk capacity of 645 liters. Its spacious interior is complemented by dimensions of 5125 mm in length, 2034 mm in width, and 1721 mm in height.
Meanwhile, the Volvo EX90 offers a versatile seating arrangement for up to six passengers, though its trunk capacity is a more modest 310 liters. It measures 5037 mm long, 1964 mm wide, and 1744 mm high, providing a slightly more compact option without sacrificing comfort.
These electric giants are more than just modes of transport; they are statements of sustainability, innovation, and luxury. The Mercedes EQS SUV stands out with its range, power variety, and expansive trunk space, while the Volvo EX90 offers substantial power and a unique six-seater configuration. Ultimately, both vehicles represent the future of automotive innovation, leaving potential buyers spoiled for choice depending on their priorities.
As we move towards an electrified future, both the Mercedes EQS SUV and Volvo EX90 showcase what luxury and environmental responsibility can look like in harmony.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Volvo EX90 has a clearly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 73700 £ , while the Mercedes EQS SUV costs 95000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 21267 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Volvo EX90: with 17.80 kWh per 100 km, it’s somewhat more efficient than the Mercedes EQS SUV with 19.60 kWh. That’s a difference of about 1.80 kWh.
As for electric range, the Mercedes EQS SUV performs slightly better – achieving up to 695 km, about 75 km more than the Volvo EX90.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EX90 has a barely noticeable edge – offering 680 HP compared to 658 HP. That’s roughly 22 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EX90 is barely noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 4.20 s, while the Mercedes EQS SUV takes 4.40 s. That’s about 0.20 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Mercedes EQS SUV performs slightly better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Volvo EX90 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 30 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Mercedes EQS SUV pulls hardly perceptible stronger with 950 Nm compared to 870 Nm. That’s about 80 Nm difference.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Volvo EX90 offers noticeable more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.
In curb weight, Volvo EX90 is hardly perceptible lighter – 2556 kg compared to 2695 kg. The difference is around 139 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Mercedes EQS SUV offers clearly more room – 645 L compared to 324 L. That’s a difference of about 321 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Volvo EX90 performs minimal better – up to 2135 L, which is about 35 L more than the Mercedes EQS SUV.
When it comes to payload, Volvo EX90 hardly perceptible takes the win – 585 kg compared to 570 kg. That’s a difference of about 15 kg.
The Mercedes EQS SUV has only a minor advantage in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mercedes EQS SUV blends limousine-level quiet and luxury with the commanding presence of an SUV, wrapping passengers in sumptuous materials and a futuristic, screen-dominated cabin. It drives with serene confidence and delivers the kind of effortless refinement that makes city commutes and long trips feel like first-class experiences — just be prepared for attention wherever you park it.
details
The Volvo EX90 feels like a Scandinavian fortress on wheels, combining serene luxury with smart safety features that make everyday driving remarkably calm and confident. It dresses cutting-edge electric technology in understated elegance, so buyers who want peace of mind without shouting about it will find it hard to resist.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
95000 - 212100 £
|
Price
73700 - 94100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.6 - 21.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.8 - 19.3 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
615 - 695 km
|
Electric Range
570 - 620 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
108.4 - 118 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
88 - 102 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
4 - 5
|
Seats
6 - 7
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2695 - 3075 kg
|
Curb weight
2556 - 2764 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
440 - 645 L
|
Trunk capacity
324 L
|
|
Length
5125 mm
|
Length
5037 mm
|
|
Width
1959 - 2034 mm
|
Width
1964 mm
|
|
Height
1718 - 1721 mm
|
Height
1744 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
2100 L
|
Max trunk capacity
2082 - 2135 L
|
|
Payload
425 - 570 kg
|
Payload
375 - 585 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
360 - 658 HP
|
Power HP
333 - 680 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.4 - 6.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.2 - 6.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
210 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
568 - 950 Nm
|
Torque
480 - 870 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
265 - 484 kW
|
Power kW
245 - 500 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Brand
Volvo
|
The Mercedes EQS SUV is available as All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España