VS

Mercedes EQS SUV vs Renault Kangoo Compact Van comparison

Compare performance (658 HP vs 122 HP), boot space and price (95,000 £ vs 25,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes EQS SUV or Renault Kangoo Compact Van?

Mercedes EQS SUV vs Renault Kangoo Compact Van: Key differences

Mercedes EQS SUV

  • substantially more power
  • marginally more efficient
  • considerably more electric range
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Renault Kangoo Compact Van

  • clearly cheaper
  • clearly lighter
details

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

EQS SUV

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Renault Kangoo Compact Van is clearly cheaper – starting at 25,200 £ , while the Mercedes EQS SUV costs 95,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 69,799 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Mercedes EQS SUV is marginally more efficient: consuming 19.6 kWh/100km compared to 20.5 kWh/100km for the Renault Kangoo Compact Van. That’s a difference of about 0.9 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Mercedes EQS SUV offers considerably more range – reaching up to 695 km, about 411 km more than the Renault Kangoo Compact Van.

Kangoo Compact Van

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes EQS SUV offers substantially more power – delivering 658 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 536 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes EQS SUV is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.4 s, while the Renault Kangoo Compact Van takes 12.3 s. That’s about 7.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes EQS SUV delivers significantly more torque with 950 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 680 Nm more.

EQS SUV

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Renault Kangoo Compact Van is clearly lighter – 1,639 kg compared to 2,695 kg. The difference is around 1,056 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Renault Kangoo Compact Van carries clearly more – 901 kg compared to 570 kg. That’s a difference of about 331 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mercedes EQS SUV holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £95,000
EQS SUV

Mercedes EQS SUV

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 360 - 658 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 19.6 - 21.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 615 - 695 km
Mercedes EQS SUV
Renault Kangoo Compact Van

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Mercedes EQS SUV

The Mercedes EQS SUV blends limousine-level quiet and luxury with the commanding presence of an SUV, wrapping passengers in sumptuous materials and a futuristic, screen-dominated cabin. It drives with serene confidence and delivers the kind of effortless refinement that makes city commutes and long trips feel like first-class experiences — just be prepared for attention wherever you park it.

details

Renault Kangoo Compact Van

The Renault Kangoo is a practical, no-nonsense compact van that turns urban deliveries and weekend DIY runs into a surprisingly easy chore. Roomy for its size, comfortable to drive and brimming with smart storage solutions, it’s a sensible pick for anyone who needs honest utility without drama.

details
Mercedes EQS SUV
Renault Kangoo Compact Van

Costs and Consumption

Price
95,000 - 212,100 £
Price
25,200 - 37,000 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
19.6 - 21.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
20.5 - 20.6 kWh/100km
Electric Range
615 - 695 km
Electric Range
279 - 284 km
Battery Capacity
108.4 - 118 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 - 151 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Cargo Van
Seats
4 - 5
Seats
2 - 5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,695 - 3,075 kg
Curb weight
1,639 - 1,910 kg
Trunk capacity
440 - 645 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
5,125 mm
Length
-
Width
1,959 - 2,034 mm
Width
1,860 mm
Height
1,718 - 1,721 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
2,100 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
425 - 570 kg
Payload
670 - 901 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manual, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
360 - 658 HP
Power HP
95 - 122 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.4 - 6.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.3 - 14.4 s
Max Speed
210 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
568 - 950 Nm
Torque
245 - 270 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
265 - 484 kW
Power kW
70 - 90 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,461 cm3

General

Model Year
2024
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, A
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
Brand
Renault
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.